지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.11
- 수록면
- 1 - 120 (120page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to suggest measures to improve the system for the effective utilization of local government bonds. To this purpose, the status of local finance and issuance system of local bonds were analyzed due to the strengthening of the government"s expansionary fiscal stance and rapid increase in the local government spending demand under the recent economic recession caused by COVID-19 pandemic effects.
The central government sought to strengthen the role of local finance in responding to COVID-19. Furthermore, as a measure for balanced regional development of Korea New Deal, it emphasized revitalization of the local bonds and restructuring of the local finance expenditure in relation to the investment in regional investment of about 75 trillion won, which is 47% of the input capital. In the case of local finance, demand for the local bonds is expected to expand as demand for spending is soaring, while the local government faces difficulties in securing tax revenues due to the continued economic slump caused by the COVID-19.
There are three main reasons why the local governments are reluctant to use local bonds: First, traditional practice of maintaining the fiscal management integrity by the central government. Second, the political burden for the local government heads. Third, negative perceptions such as the deterioration of local finance integrity due to the increase in local debt and expansion of the current budget.
Local bonds need to be actively utilized as a means of procuring public investment funds from local government. The use of local bonds can ensure inter-generational equity of the financial burden by allowing the current and future generation to shoulder both benefits and expenditures for specific projects. In addition, Stable secure of investment resources and planning of financial management through the issuance of local bonds are considered important policy activities of local government. It is possible to promote social welfare through continuous regional development and provision of public services. Local governments also can issue local bonds as a flexible and quick way to financing method for disaster recovery and securing investment funds. However, Financial pressures may bring in compliance with on internal and external economic conditions.
Four measures were proposed to improve the system for revitalizing local bonds. First, it is necessary to expand the scope of life SOC projects that can be utilized through local bonds. In particular, the increase in population density and traffic volume is due to the need to expand infrastructure public facilities. Second, introduction to a system of residents" participation in the regional and living SOC expansion of utilization of local bonds. It is to prioritize through a survey of residents demand and go through procedures for residents consent in issuing local bonds. Third, the expansion of the use of local bonds using regional development funds. Management is required to enhance the profitability of the regional development funds, and the ordinance is required to be revised to expand the scope of loans. Finally, it is necessary to establish an organization specializing in local government financing and lending from a long-term perspective to ensure stable procurement of local public-sector investment funds. This is because local government administrative and financial conditions have led to a surge in demand for local finance.
The central government sought to strengthen the role of local finance in responding to COVID-19. Furthermore, as a measure for balanced regional development of Korea New Deal, it emphasized revitalization of the local bonds and restructuring of the local finance expenditure in relation to the investment in regional investment of about 75 trillion won, which is 47% of the input capital. In the case of local finance, demand for the local bonds is expected to expand as demand for spending is soaring, while the local government faces difficulties in securing tax revenues due to the continued economic slump caused by the COVID-19.
There are three main reasons why the local governments are reluctant to use local bonds: First, traditional practice of maintaining the fiscal management integrity by the central government. Second, the political burden for the local government heads. Third, negative perceptions such as the deterioration of local finance integrity due to the increase in local debt and expansion of the current budget.
Local bonds need to be actively utilized as a means of procuring public investment funds from local government. The use of local bonds can ensure inter-generational equity of the financial burden by allowing the current and future generation to shoulder both benefits and expenditures for specific projects. In addition, Stable secure of investment resources and planning of financial management through the issuance of local bonds are considered important policy activities of local government. It is possible to promote social welfare through continuous regional development and provision of public services. Local governments also can issue local bonds as a flexible and quick way to financing method for disaster recovery and securing investment funds. However, Financial pressures may bring in compliance with on internal and external economic conditions.
Four measures were proposed to improve the system for revitalizing local bonds. First, it is necessary to expand the scope of life SOC projects that can be utilized through local bonds. In particular, the increase in population density and traffic volume is due to the need to expand infrastructure public facilities. Second, introduction to a system of residents" participation in the regional and living SOC expansion of utilization of local bonds. It is to prioritize through a survey of residents demand and go through procedures for residents consent in issuing local bonds. Third, the expansion of the use of local bonds using regional development funds. Management is required to enhance the profitability of the regional development funds, and the ordinance is required to be revised to expand the scope of loans. Finally, it is necessary to establish an organization specializing in local government financing and lending from a long-term perspective to ensure stable procurement of local public-sector investment funds. This is because local government administrative and financial conditions have led to a surge in demand for local finance.
목차
[표지]
[정책건의]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 연구의 방법 및 선행연구 검토
[제2장 지방채에 관한 이론적 고찰]
1. 지방채의 의의 및 역할
2. 지방채의 발행 제도 실태
[제3장 지방재정 현황]
1. 지방재정 현황
2. 지방재정 세입⋅세출 실태
3. 경기도 재정실태
[제4장 지방정부 자금조달 해외사례 분석]
1. 일본의 지방정부 자금조달 기구
2. 북유럽 국가의 지방정부 자금조달 기구
3. 시사점
[제5장 지방채 활용을 위한 개선 방안]
1. 배경 및 필요성
2. 지방채무 현황 및 실태
3. 경기도 지방채무 실태
4. 지방채 활용을 위한 단계적 개선 방안
[제6장 결론]
1. 연구 요약
2. 정책 제언
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지방자치단체장의 정치적 요인이 지방채 발행에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구
한국지방재정논집
2017 .04
-
Societal fragilities and resilience: The emergence of peoplehood in Belarus
Journal of Eurasian Studies
2021 .08
-
지방재정법상 지방채 발행제도의 개선방안 연구
경영법률
2015 .01
-
지방재정 투자사업 심사체계 개선방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2020 .04
-
중앙-지방 상생발전 가능한 거버넌스 대안 : 복지재정과 지방재정 간 관계를 중심으로
한국비교정부학보
2015 .01
-
A Simple Indicator of Local Government's Economic Policy: Example from Japan’s New Local Revitalization Policy
아태비즈니스연구
2016 .12
-
Does Local Autonomy Enhance the Autonomy in Local Public Finance? : Evidence from the Case of Korea
Korea and the World Economy
2015 .04
-
지방정부는 주민의 수요에 반응하는가?: 2020 기초지방자치단체 공공서비스 분야별 예산을 중심으로
지방정부연구
2022 .05
-
중국 지방채권 발행의 추이와 특징
중국지역연구
2020 .01
-
지방자치제도 이후 지역축제의 변화 : 축제 소재의 변화를 중심으로
글로컬 창의 문화연구
2017 .06
-
지방공기업 채권신용등급 결정요인 연구
한국지방재정논집
2021 .08
-
조례와 법률우위의 원칙- 지방의회와 지방자치단체장간의 권한범위에 관한 대법원 판례를 중심으로 -
원광법학
2015 .01
-
기초지자체의 향토자원 사업화 프로세스 정립 및 추진전략
관광산업연구
2015 .01
-
지방공기업 부실에 따른 지방과 국가재정에 대한 영향 분석
제도와 경제
2017 .01
-
일본 자치체 정책법무의 개관과향후 연구과제
지방자치법연구
2018 .01
-
로컬푸드 조례의 개선 방안 연구－법률 및 조례 비교를 중심으로－
식품유통연구
2015 .01
-
지방의원의 전문성과 지방의회의 견제기능 간의 관계에 관한 연구:단체장과 의회 관계의 조절효과를 중심으로
한국지방자치연구
2021 .08
-
일본의 COC+정책에서 지역지향교육이 지역애착과 지역정착에 미치는 효과: 히로사키지역을 중심으로
한일경상논집
2023 .05
-
지방자치단체의 기관구성특례에 관한 소고
법학연구
2023 .04
-
재정분권화에 따른 지방채무의 적정수준 정의 및 관리에 관한 연구
국가정책연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
공간정보기반의 건설구조물 방재관리 신기술 적용 연구
연상호
,
연춘흠
,
김종수
한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집
2017
.05
방재 및 감재주택을 위한 건축 계획 요소의 설정
김형언
KIEAE Journal
2016
.12
건물 계획에서 유지관리까지의 방재안전요소와 대책
김은
건축환경설비
2015
.10
ICT 기술을 적용한 재난 방재시스템 기술동향
김재호
조명·전기설비
2014
.09
건축물 설계시 방재계획 실태 및 인식에 관한 설문조사 연구
김지윤
,
정숙진
,
이성화
외 1명
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2014
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-309-000053423