지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper investigates wh-extraction contrast observed between English canonical double object construction (DOC) ditransitives and Personal Dative (PD) ditransitives. Wh-DO extraction is possible out of canonical DOC ditransitives but not out of PD ditransitives. I show that syntactic locality alone cannot explain the contrast, and propose an event structure approach on the basis of Truswell’s (2007, 2008, 2010, 2011) idea of Single Event Condition. Wh-extraction of DO is legitimate in canonical DOC ditransitives as they satisfy the Single Event Condition, whereas it is illegitimate in PD ditransitives as they have bi-eventive meaning. Wh-dependency formation cannot be described in syntactic terms only; it is also partially subject to semantic well-formedness condition that relates to event structures.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (37)
참고문헌 신청
Sigrid, B. / 2004 / Double Objects Again / Linguistic Inquiry 35:97~124
Nora, B. / 2011 / When the Benefit is on the Fringe. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009 / John Benjamins :19~38
Borgonovo, C. / 2000 / Transparent Adjuncts / Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 45:199~224
Bosse, S. / 2012 / Affected Experiencers / Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30:1185~1230
Bosse, S / 2014 / A Formal Semantic Approach to Personal Datives in Southern and Appalachian English / Southern Journal of Linguistics 38:95~116
Nora, B. / 2011 / When the Benefit is on the Fringe. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009 / John Benjamins :19~38
Borgonovo, C. / 2000 / Transparent Adjuncts / Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 45:199~224
Bosse, S. / 2012 / Affected Experiencers / Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30:1185~1230
Bosse, S / 2014 / A Formal Semantic Approach to Personal Datives in Southern and Appalachian English / Southern Journal of Linguistics 38:95~116
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Corpus-based Comparative Study on the Use of English Ditransitive Construction
영미어문학
2020 .01
-
영어 이중타동사의 보문유형과 분포빈도에 대한 COCA 코퍼스 분석
영어영문학연구
2016 .01
-
Ditransitive Alternations in Lancashire Variety of Northwest British English
영어학연구
2016 .12
-
현대 중국어 이중타동구문의 의미확장에 관한 고찰 -인지언어학 이론을 중심으로-
중국언어연구
2018 .01
-
An experimental study on the production of the double accusative ditransitives in Korean
영어영문학
2021 .11
-
원어민 코퍼스와의 비교를 통한한국 대학생의 여격동사 구문 활용 특성 분석
영어영문학연구
2015 .01
-
Can focus salvage the double accusative ditranstive construction in Korean? An experimental investigation
언어연구
2022 .06
-
Idioms in Korean Ditransitive Constructions
언어학 연구
2015 .10
-
How Metonymy Affects Korean Ditransitive Constructions
언어과학
2020 .01
-
On Ditransitive Idioms : With Respect to Korean, Hebrew, and English
어학연구
2017 .04
-
In Support of the Non-Derivational Analysis of Korean Ditransitive Constructions
언어학
2024 .09
-
Enhancing the Syntactic Typology of Ditransitive Verbs in Russian
슬라브硏究
2018 .01
-
Morphological Passives and Causatives and Ditransitives: With Reference to Animacy of Ey- and Eykey-marked Elements
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2019 .11
-
중국어 ‘수여’류 이중타동구조에 대한 유형론적 고찰 (2)
중국어문논역총간
2023 .01
-
중국어 ‘수여’류 이중타동구조에 대한 유형론적 고찰(1)
중국어문논역총간
2022 .07
-
Ditransitive Asymmetries and Quantifier Scope in Korean
언어
2020 .09
-
A Semantic Account of Matrix Scope of a wh-phrase in a wh-island in Korean and English
영어학
2019 .12
-
Movement Constraints and Translating Korean wh-Questions into English
통번역교육연구
2016 .01
-
Even Wh-doublets Don't Move in a Language Without Wh-movement
생성문법연구
2016 .01
-
Subjacency Revisited: Is it Real or a Reflex of Performance Biases?
언어
2015 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0