메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김태주 (전북대학교)
저널정보
전북대학교 인문학연구소 건지인문학 건지인문학 제23호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
55 - 74 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Luo Guanzhong’s <San Kuo Chih Yen-i> has different views of the characters, but Zhuge Liang of shu is the same favorite figure among The Three Kingdoms. This is because Luo Guanzhong described Zhuge Liang as a man of extraordinary ability who reached the realm of the gods to defeat the enemy. However, to this day, the fundamental reason why Zhuge Liang became the representative of loyal ministers comes from his book <Chu Shi Biao>. But in the qing dynasty, the trend of textual research, then on the <Latter Chu Shi Biao> started a debate. Much of the pseudo-argument starts with a suspicion that the facts mentioned in differ from, or originate from, the true history. It is compared with <Former Chu Shi Biao>, in terms of the psychological state and expression of the author, the gap between them is very large, it is difficult to be sure that the same character wrote. Based on the argument of this kind of forgery, this paper verifies once again the forgery of <Latter Chu Shi Biao>, and its pseudo- author designates Zhang Yan, and has a negative attitude towards the academic designation of pseudo-author as zhuge. This is because if kucera pseudograph to advocate the northern expedition after <Latter Chu Shi Biao>, the content should exist on the legitimacy of the northern expedition and inspire the morale of the troops of the text, but it existed from the pessimistic and full dull tone cause suspicion of the northern expedition, can’t give sure of victory, and belittling Zhuge Liang and founding the sun ce. Therefore, this paper argues that the aim of the pseudo-author of is not to advocate the northern expedition, but to make other attempts. It can be found in many ways that there is a close connection with Zhang Yan’s political line in the forgery of <Latter Chu Shi Biao>. This paper wants to make a concrete and comprehensive analysis of the pseudo- argument of <Latter Chu Shi Biao>, but is limited by the lack of data, based on the situation at that time, the author’s political position, the real cognition reflected in the work and the use of words. It is hoped that more data can be drawn to study in the future, and some scholars have further analyzed the pseudo-argument of in detail.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0