메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정신동 (한국소비자원)
저널정보
충북대학교 법학연구소 법학연구 법학연구 제29권 제2호
발행연도
2018.1
수록면
127 - 158 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently, the subject of prevention and effective relief of large-scale consumer damage has been attracted by the fire incident in the vehicle of BMW company. In particular, class action and punitive damages are being reviewed, and legislation is being proposed to the Congress to expand the scope of punitive damages. In this paper, the introduction and operation of punitive damages system, which have been attracting attention again due to the car fires case, were reviewed. First, it is confirmed through comparison with German law that punitive damages can be accepted in our damages system. In particular, considering the function of non-patrimonial damage, it can be confirmed that punitive damages can form part of our legal system. Second, it is suggested that it is appropriate to call preventive damages not punitive damages because punishment and preventive functions of damages can be distinguished. This can be derived from the fact that the criminal law also distinguishes between retribution and prevention as a function of punishment. Finally, the legal condition and consequences of punitive damages in Product Liability Act, which has been attracting attention as a result of vehicle fires, were examined. It has been proposed that punitive damages in Product Liability Act should be applied even when property damage occurs, and that profit is added to the calculation of damages amount.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (43)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0