메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
수선사학회 사림 사림 제51호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
157 - 182 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The 19th Century Americans experienced the collision between the Republican values and the wage labor system. As labor historian Melvyn Dubofsky points out, it was the question of “how could a republican democracy built on the participation of economically independent freeholders and artisans endure in a society composed in the main of dependent wage earners?” It was also the question of how the Republican order could be maintained in the capitalist system which failed to share its benefits equally on labor citizens. The laborers who claimed to contribute to the American Revolution and the building of the Republican nation asked for their fair share. But what they encountered was the harsh reality that culminated the gap between the Republican ideals and the wage labor system that degraded them to be subjects of their own masters. Therefore the criticism of the labor republicans was centered on the wage labor system, which the critics called as the wage slavery. The critics of the wage labor denigrated the ‘wage system’ as the main obstacle to what they thought of as their birthright: freedom, independence, and democratic citizenship. They believed that wages and republicanism were on a collision course, with wage labor destroying the possibility of democratic government. They begun to indict an emergent industrial order by affirming the significance of the nation’s political commitment to independent citizenship. Workers’ rejection of wage labor drew from notions of freedom, independence, and citizenship, which interconnected areas of politics, society, and economics. In the political arena, workers thought that equality was possible only if each member of the polity was economically independent. In the guise of the voluntary contract they perceived a compulsion that they believed made it impossible to exercise citizenship. The critics tried to escape from the wage slavery through the change of the power imbalance with employers. They sought to strengthen heir position through education, organization, cooperation, and political influence , and most of all, to enable them to share in the gains and honors of advancing civilization. The labor republicans of the 19th century failed to implement their believes in the American system. The labor movement which have survived mostly focused on the practical goals with the rules of the capitalist system and did not touch the fundamental question of the wage labor as did the labor republicans. However, in considering today’s economic inequality which becomes severe than ever, it is important to remind and reexamine the arguments of the labor republicans that the wage should not be determined wholly by the market but intervened by the social considerations in order to give back the labor citizens their rights to live freely and equally.
#임노동 #임노예제 #공화주의적 가치 #노동자당 #노동기사단 #Wage Labor #Wage Slavery #Republican Value #Workingmen's Party #Knights of Labor

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0