메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
정수진 (한국미술연구소)
저널정보
한국미술연구소 미술사논단 美術史論壇 제53호
발행연도
2021.12
수록면
57 - 82 (26page)
DOI
10.14380/AHF.2021.53.57

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Most Chinese painting histories written in the West in the early 20th century define the Tang and Song dynasties, especially the Song dynasty, as the pinnacle of Chinese art. In general, the rules of canon in art history are agreed upon by the interaction between academic achievements and art mechanisms such as art museums, art markets, and art education. However, in the early 20th century, Chinese art was not sufficiently distributed or educated in Western society. Therefore, understanding how scholars’ viewpoints were formed under these conditions is an example of what the discipline of art history depends on in a specific situation.
Japan was the first country to publish the history of Chinese art, including the history of Chinese painting. What is noteworthy is the fact that the viewpoint of Japanese academics has changed from Tang-Song in the late Meiji period to the Yuan zenith theory of the early Taisho period, and there was a political intention behind this background. Although Western researchers had no political intentions, they were greatly influenced by Japanese publications such as Histoire de l’art du Japon and the Japanese and English versions of Kokka . Accordingly, in the early Chinese painting history in the West, the view of the Song dynasty as the apex was dominant. And it is inferred that the reason why the Yuan zenith theory was not accepted in the West was due to Western art history which viewed the Renaissance as the apex, and the prejudice against literati painting. In other words, it can be said that the Western Chinese painting history in the early 20th century was formed by the insufficient data for knowledge accumulation, the cultural power of Japanese art history academia, and the prism of Western art history.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 근대기 일본 학자들의 중국회화사 정점기 규정
Ⅲ. 서구 학자들의 초기 중국회화사
Ⅳ. 서구 학계의 당송정점론 형성 배경
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0