메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이승희 (한양대학교)
저널정보
중국문화연구학회 중국문화연구 中國文化硏究 第55輯
발행연도
2022.2
수록면
53 - 74 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Transnational networks have been formed as a result of the development of communication and technology in the twenty-first century. Through “telepoesis” (imagination across time and space), the concept of diaspora has been renewed by combining and creatively transforming the cultures of the homelands left behind and the new places in which people settle. Such transformations have occurred because of the loosened relationships, previously more rigid, that immigrants now have with and their homelands. In this article, I examine two films: Ip Man 4, which shows an aspect of Hong Kong’s identity that is inevitably confused because of Hong Kong’s political and cultural distance from mainland China; and Minari, which focuses on the transformation of the self of a Korean immigrant family that belongs to neither Korea nor the US and is in the process of overcoming economic threats in a foreign land. On the one hand, the characters in these two films clearly demonstrate the predicament of not being a “National” despite the insistent calling of the motherland embedded in the terms “hwagyo” and “dongpo.” On the other hand, the audience outside of the films place themselves once again within the paradigm of being Korean nationals while consciously and unconsciously overlooking the characters’ predicaments. However, in the modern nation state that has begun to corrode, such a manner of acceptance reveals the contradictions and cracks in the audience’s understanding. It is clearly contradictory for Korean audiences to consider Ip Man 4 as an example of “jungppong” and to display their hatred toward it, while they are intoxicated with “gukppong” and consume Minari as they enjoy a sense of pride as members of the nation state. That this ironic situation in which the terms “gukppong” and “jungppong,” which in fact belong to the same category, leads to such different emotions encapsulates the distorted image of nationalism of Korea, and furthermore, in East Asia. Therefore, this article raises a question about nationalism once again by focusing on the different receptions given these two films by cultural consumers who are constantly reviving the nation and state. It is also to protect the positive value that Korean culture has built up for its coexistence and harmony.

목차

1. 디아스포라를 향한 두 가지 시선
2. ‘우리는 중국인이다’라는 감각의 강요
3. 문화소비 주체로서의 ‘한국인’
4. ‘국뽕’, 국민 되기 패러다임의 재림
參考文獻
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-910-001336157