지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제124호
- 발행연도
- 2022.6
- 수록면
- 77 - 114 (38page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2022.06.124.77
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Sagun-ji is a book trailing the history of the four Chinese Han(漢) Commandery units. Its author Yu Deuk-gong believed that the dismantled Commanderies were directly succeeded by the Ancient Kingdoms of the Korean peninsula. That is why there were so many references to all the three kingdoms (Goguryeo, Baekje and Shilla) inserted in the “Facts(事實)” chapter of Sagun-ji.
All these various references listed in Sagun-ji’s “Facts” chapter are quoted from either Chinese official histories or Korea’s Samguk Sagi. Quotes from the same book are listed in chronological order, and repetitive accounts over the same historical event seemed to have been sorted out and removed. All the references are also quoted in their original forms.
In Sagun-ji, there are a number of ‘Anseol(按說)’ remarks, which means “the author’s thoughts.” These were inserted in the book to allow Yu Deuk-gong himself to express his opinion over the matters at hand, and most of them were used to provide the readers with information or knowledge pertaining to the Three Ancient Kingdoms, such as names of regions, titles of facilities or other kinds of historical facts. Also can be found here is some criticism against Kim Bu-shik(author of Samguk Sagi), and Yu’s own argument that “The Four Commanderies[四郡] merged into two[二郡], became three[三郡], and then turned into the Three Kingdoms[三國].”
Sagun-ji was a study of ancient historical geography, inspired by the scholars’ general interest in the Northern region of the Korean peninsula. It also displays the author’s belief in the aforementioned ‘successive relationship,’ which supposedly existed between the four Han Commandery units and the Three Ancient Korean Kingdoms. Such belief was a crucial part in people’s perception of Korean ancient history at the time. To them the legitimate line of succession was a very important matter, so perceiving the past in this manner was quite popular. Yu Deuk-gong himself was highly interested in the legacy of the Goguryeo dynasty, and considered Baekje and Shilla as entitles that had been founded later than Goguryeo, providing them with lesser historical meanings. This suggests he had a very Goguryeo-centric historical view, which we can also see from the fact that he believed the Goguryeo territory went beyond the Korean peninsula and reached into the Manchu region. That was why he got interested in the peninsula’s Northern regions in the first place, and the four Han Commandery units located there as well. The objective of Sagun-ji was essentially to quench Yu’s thirst and curiosity in the North.
All these various references listed in Sagun-ji’s “Facts” chapter are quoted from either Chinese official histories or Korea’s Samguk Sagi. Quotes from the same book are listed in chronological order, and repetitive accounts over the same historical event seemed to have been sorted out and removed. All the references are also quoted in their original forms.
In Sagun-ji, there are a number of ‘Anseol(按說)’ remarks, which means “the author’s thoughts.” These were inserted in the book to allow Yu Deuk-gong himself to express his opinion over the matters at hand, and most of them were used to provide the readers with information or knowledge pertaining to the Three Ancient Kingdoms, such as names of regions, titles of facilities or other kinds of historical facts. Also can be found here is some criticism against Kim Bu-shik(author of Samguk Sagi), and Yu’s own argument that “The Four Commanderies[四郡] merged into two[二郡], became three[三郡], and then turned into the Three Kingdoms[三國].”
Sagun-ji was a study of ancient historical geography, inspired by the scholars’ general interest in the Northern region of the Korean peninsula. It also displays the author’s belief in the aforementioned ‘successive relationship,’ which supposedly existed between the four Han Commandery units and the Three Ancient Korean Kingdoms. Such belief was a crucial part in people’s perception of Korean ancient history at the time. To them the legitimate line of succession was a very important matter, so perceiving the past in this manner was quite popular. Yu Deuk-gong himself was highly interested in the legacy of the Goguryeo dynasty, and considered Baekje and Shilla as entitles that had been founded later than Goguryeo, providing them with lesser historical meanings. This suggests he had a very Goguryeo-centric historical view, which we can also see from the fact that he believed the Goguryeo territory went beyond the Korean peninsula and reached into the Manchu region. That was why he got interested in the peninsula’s Northern regions in the first place, and the four Han Commandery units located there as well. The objective of Sagun-ji was essentially to quench Yu’s thirst and curiosity in the North.
목차
머리말
1. 『사군지』 ‘사실’조 구성 및 내용 분석
2. 유득공의 한국고대사 인식
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『노자』 「도경」에서 1(一)의 의미
인문학논총
2017 .02
-
한국고대사의 대중화와 대중문화화
한국고대사연구
2016 .12
-
『日本史B』 교과서의 廣開土王碑 관련 서술과 역사인식
역사교육
2021 .09
-
고등학교 한국사 교과서의 ‘북벌론’ 서사 분석
역사교육논집
2024 .06
-
고등학교 세계사 교과서의 중국고중세사 서술 : 역사 용어를 중심으로
역사교육
2017 .06
-
한국 근대역사학의 발해사 인식 : 南北國論을 중심으로
한국사연구
2017 .12
-
National History Textbooks in the Era of Global Citizenship Education: Coexistence of Global Objectives and Nationalist Narratives on the History of Ancient Korea
Korea Journal
2022 .06
-
의문 보문소로서의 ‘ㄹ지’: 상위 술어의 (비)진실성과 (비)사실성
언어와언어학
2021 .01
-
공공역사 논의의 한국적 맥락과 공공역사가들
역사비평
2021 .08
-
[고대] 새로운 모색과 과제 : 서양고대사 2015~2016
역사학보
2017 .09
-
최근 한국상고사 논쟁의 본질과 그 대응
역사와현실
2016 .06
-
한국 고대사와 지역주의적 역사이해 - 지역학과 지역사, 지역주의 역사문화권사업의 부각 -
한국고대사연구
2024 .06
-
역사스토리텔링과 한국고대사
한국고대사연구
2016 .12
-
[고대] 서양고대사 회고와 전망(2013~14년) : 어게인 ‘역사학의 다양화’
역사학보
2015 .09
-
분단시대의 우상(偶像) - 서해5도 수역을 둘러싼 안보 개념의 ‘발명’과 ‘변주’ -
역사와현실
2022 .12
-
한국사의 의미에 비추어 본 현행 교육과정 고대사 체계의 문제점과 개선 방향
대구사학
2022 .05
-
21세기 한국고대사의 연구 성과와 지평의 확장 - 새롭게, 세밀하게 그리고 경계를 넘어 -
한국사연구
2023 .03
-
북방사, 50여 년 연구 여정의 또 다른 농축(김정배, 2018, 『한국과 중국의 북방사 인식』, 세창출판사)
한국사학보
2019 .05
-
동아시아의 현재와 경험에서 한국 역사학･역사교육의 길 찾기
역사와현실
2016 .12
-
북한의 전략국가 지위론과 한반도 리스크관리
역사와현실
2022 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『사군지』 「토산(土産)」과 유득공의 북방 인식
윤성재
역사와실학
2022
.11
『사군지(四郡志)』 「명환(名宦)」·「인물」조의 특징과 편찬의도
박미선
역사와실학
2022
.11
고구려발해연구 제74집 휘보 및 간행규정 외
편집부
고구려발해연구
2022
.11
크라스키노 발해성, 지난 40년간의 발굴조사 성과를 총망라하다 - 『크라스키노 발해성 -발굴 40년의 성과』(김은국 외 지음, 청아출판사, 2021) -
이우섭
고구려발해연구
2022
.11
泉毖의 장인, 太原公 王暐의 출자에 대한 새로운 이해
김수진
고구려발해연구
2022
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2022-911-001553802