지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와 현실 제125호
- 발행연도
- 2022.9
- 수록면
- 355 - 395 (41page)
- DOI
- 10.35865/YWH.2022.09.125.355
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The social stratification system of the Joseon dynasty was closely related to the dynasty’s institution of drafting individuals for dynastic services. The state regularly surveyed households throughout the country, enlisted male individuals above the age of 16 and under 60, and then mobilized them for dynastic labor services required by the government, in the form of providing them with adequate status and duties. But not all individuals were economically suited for obligations laid out by the government, so individuals in those situations were legally exempted from such duties. These private citizens(私民) instead delivered their labors and properties to their masters(主家), and by aiding their masters’ performance of their duties they indirectly contributed to the government in their own ways.
Then, coming into the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century, the government decided to transform those private citizens into public citizens(公民), and have them perform duties assigned to them directly from the government. The first case of this policy was the government’s recruit of Gyeong-Nobi(京奴婢) figures who had been private Nobi figures in the Hamgyeong-do(咸鏡道) provincial region. The Hamgyeong-do province was a border region that was located in the far north of the entire peninsula, so securing enough workforce that could be put to military duties at all time was more than crucial. Furthering such needs at the time was a regime change in China from the Ming dynasty to the Qing. Such transfer of power on the international stage was a big pressure for the Joseon government, and desperate nature of the time called for the mobilization of Nobi figures to deploy as military assets too. In fulfilling such goal, the Gyeong-Nobi figures in this region, who had been private Nobi figures and enjoyed very loose ties with their masters to the extent of having their own separated livelihood, were the first ones to be recruited by the central government. The Joseon authorities would “purchase them and turn them into Gong-Nobi (Public Nobi) figures who would serve governmental offices”[買作公賤, ‘Maejak Gongcheon’], or encourage them to “buy their ways into becoming commoners ”[贖良, ‘Sok’ ryang’] and then enlist them as military personnel.
This policy of the Joseon government, utilizing methods of either ‘Maejak Gongcheon’ or ‘Sok’ryang, ‘later spread to the entire country, effectively nullifying the previous Joseon convention of having all the Nobi slaves’ offspring inherit the same status with their parents. Now the authorities were instead having them either become a commoner, or having them (remain as slaves but) assume military posts, which had only been manned by commoners in the past. As these former(or current) Nobi slaves became figures under the government’s public control their status continued to elevate, and that brought significant changes to not only the Nobi institution of the country but the entire dynasty’s stratification system as well, during the Joseon period’s latter half.
Then, coming into the 17<SUP>th</SUP> century, the government decided to transform those private citizens into public citizens(公民), and have them perform duties assigned to them directly from the government. The first case of this policy was the government’s recruit of Gyeong-Nobi(京奴婢) figures who had been private Nobi figures in the Hamgyeong-do(咸鏡道) provincial region. The Hamgyeong-do province was a border region that was located in the far north of the entire peninsula, so securing enough workforce that could be put to military duties at all time was more than crucial. Furthering such needs at the time was a regime change in China from the Ming dynasty to the Qing. Such transfer of power on the international stage was a big pressure for the Joseon government, and desperate nature of the time called for the mobilization of Nobi figures to deploy as military assets too. In fulfilling such goal, the Gyeong-Nobi figures in this region, who had been private Nobi figures and enjoyed very loose ties with their masters to the extent of having their own separated livelihood, were the first ones to be recruited by the central government. The Joseon authorities would “purchase them and turn them into Gong-Nobi (Public Nobi) figures who would serve governmental offices”[買作公賤, ‘Maejak Gongcheon’], or encourage them to “buy their ways into becoming commoners ”[贖良, ‘Sok’ ryang’] and then enlist them as military personnel.
This policy of the Joseon government, utilizing methods of either ‘Maejak Gongcheon’ or ‘Sok’ryang, ‘later spread to the entire country, effectively nullifying the previous Joseon convention of having all the Nobi slaves’ offspring inherit the same status with their parents. Now the authorities were instead having them either become a commoner, or having them (remain as slaves but) assume military posts, which had only been manned by commoners in the past. As these former(or current) Nobi slaves became figures under the government’s public control their status continued to elevate, and that brought significant changes to not only the Nobi institution of the country but the entire dynasty’s stratification system as well, during the Joseon period’s latter half.
#함경도 사노비
#토노비
#경노비
#공민화
#매작공천
#속량
#국역체제
#private Nobi figures in the Hamgyeong-do province
#To-Nobi(local Nobi)
#Gyeong-Nobi(京奴婢)
#turning lowborns into figures under the government's public control
#(the government's) purchasing Nobi slaves to turn them into Nobi workers for governmental offices[買作公賤]
#having Nobi slaves obtain commoner status with money[贖良]
#dynastic system for service drafting
목차
머리말
1. 함경도의 독특한 예속인들 : 고공과 사노비
2. 국가의 경노비 점유 시도
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고전서사에 형상화된 노비의 존재성 탐구
돈암어문학
2017 .06
-
<화산선계록> 속 노비 형상화의 특징과 노비의 존재성
반교어문연구
2022 .12
-
고려 후기 전민변정과 조선 초기 노비 정책의 의의와 한계
역사비평
2018 .02
-
호적대장을 통해 본 조선후기 노비층의 증감현상― 대구부 동상면을 중심으로
대동문화연구
2015 .01
-
여말선초의 ‘노비-천민(天民)’ 인식과 그 양면성
한국사연구
2021 .09
-
한국 한시에 나타난 노비
동양고전연구
2017 .01
-
메타비평, 해체, 트랜스텍스트성으로 읽는 노예법
성경원문연구
2021 .04
-
진천 평산 신씨 노비 가족의 존재양상 -노비의 결혼과 가계 계승을 중심으로-
古文書硏究
2018 .01
-
『자비』를 통한 토니 모리슨의 노예서사 다시 쓰기
영미문학교육
2015 .01
-
1807년 영국의 노예 무역 폐지와 존 뉴턴
신학과 목회
2016 .05
-
신라의 奴人村 - ｢울진봉평리신라비｣를 중심으로-
대구사학
2016 .01
-
조선조 야담 속 노비의 형상과 그 의미
인문사회과학연구
2023 .02
-
18-19세기 노비 호구수 변화 양상에 대한 재검토 : 호적대장을 바라보는 새로운 시각
역사민속학
2017 .06
-
디아스포라 역사에서 희생자로 남지 않기—카릴 필립스의 『강을 건너며』와 대서양 노예서사
현대영미소설
2018 .01
-
자본주의와 인종차별의 착종 : 모리슨의『자비』
신영어영문학
2016 .08
-
부치 에메체타의 작품에 나타난 결혼의 의미: 노예상태의 메타포
영미어문학
2017 .06
-
18세기 영주 濟民樓 소속 노비의 모습
영남학
2023 .06
-
『오루노코: 고귀한 영혼의 노예』와 『자비』에 나타난 시혜적 자비와 고귀한 저항에 대한 고찰
새한영어영문학
2021 .05
-
스티브 매퀸의『노예 12년』: 공감에 기초한 새 노예 서술
영미문화
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-911-000127359