지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.9
- 수록면
- 81 - 106 (26page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2022.9.95.81
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In China’s modernization, which began to overcome the crisis brought on by the Western powers, it was important to invite foreign advisers to have modern military power. At that time, the foreign advisors invited were generally in the form of inviting a small number of individual foreign experts. However, in order to overcome the disorder at home and abroad, the national government invited foreign military advisers in the form of an advisory group. The invitations of the military advisers were in the order of Germany, the Soviet Union, and the United States. The activities of the Soviet advisory group, which began one year after the outbreak of the Sino-Japanese War, led the Chiang Kai-shek government, which was fully invaded by Japan equipped with modern armed forces, to continue the war. Therefore, later people valued the role highly.
From the Military Affairs Commission in the central government to each front, Soviet advisers supported the development of the battle plan. In addition, the advisors suggested improvements to the insufficient situation of the National Government Army, such as unit operation, improvement of the treatment of soldiers, rewards, training, and organization, and also helped with post-battle review and analysis. According to the records, at the time, the adviser"s proposal was largely affirmed by the Chinese side, but that did not mean that it was executed immediately or all. Practically, some people at the time evaluated the work of advisors positively, but there were cases where underestimated their role.
Soviet advisers said they felt difficult at work. The causes were differences in ideology, and differences in age and rank etc., between Soviet advisers and Chinese commanders. There were also structural problems in the operation of the advisory group. Soviet advisers were ostensibly sent as individuals, but in reality they were under the supervision of the Soviet government. Therefore, although China wanted to manage and control Soviet advisers, the activities and influence of advisers were entirely under the supervision of the general advisers and the Soviet government, so there was a limit to the management of the national government.
By supporting not only Soviet materials but also human resources such as advisors, the Chinese army was organized and trained, and with the help of operational planning, they was able to continue the war in the early days of the Sino-Japanese War. However, in addition to this evaluation, it can be seen that difficulties existed between the collaborators of both sides at the time.
From the Military Affairs Commission in the central government to each front, Soviet advisers supported the development of the battle plan. In addition, the advisors suggested improvements to the insufficient situation of the National Government Army, such as unit operation, improvement of the treatment of soldiers, rewards, training, and organization, and also helped with post-battle review and analysis. According to the records, at the time, the adviser"s proposal was largely affirmed by the Chinese side, but that did not mean that it was executed immediately or all. Practically, some people at the time evaluated the work of advisors positively, but there were cases where underestimated their role.
Soviet advisers said they felt difficult at work. The causes were differences in ideology, and differences in age and rank etc., between Soviet advisers and Chinese commanders. There were also structural problems in the operation of the advisory group. Soviet advisers were ostensibly sent as individuals, but in reality they were under the supervision of the Soviet government. Therefore, although China wanted to manage and control Soviet advisers, the activities and influence of advisers were entirely under the supervision of the general advisers and the Soviet government, so there was a limit to the management of the national government.
By supporting not only Soviet materials but also human resources such as advisors, the Chinese army was organized and trained, and with the help of operational planning, they was able to continue the war in the early days of the Sino-Japanese War. However, in addition to this evaluation, it can be seen that difficulties existed between the collaborators of both sides at the time.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 중일전쟁시기 소련 군사고문의 초빙 배경
Ⅲ. 소련 군사고문의 초빙
Ⅳ. 전시 소련 고문과 중국의 협력과 평가
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
위기에서의 선택 — 한국전쟁에 대한 중국의 정책 결정 논평 —
중국근현대사연구
2022 .03
-
6·25전쟁발발 전후 장제스의 ‘반공대륙(反攻大陸)’ 구상
중국근현대사연구
2020 .09
-
중일전쟁발발 전후 중국의 대외 군수물자 확보
중국근현대사연구
2023 .09
-
중일전쟁시기 중국 공군인력 양성과 소련 — ‘이닝(伊寧)항공학교’를 중심으로 —
중국근현대사연구
2021 .12
-
태평양전쟁 초기 중국의 팽창주의와 미국의 한반도 신탁통치 결정(1941~1943)
역사학보
2022 .12
-
蔣介石의‘원동연맹’결성 구상과 좌절
역사문화연구
2019 .01
-
중국과 소련의 핵 기술 개발 협력 재고, 1945~1960
대동문화연구
2017 .01
-
냉전시기 중공의 외교노선과 북중관계의 전개
중국근현대사연구
2021 .09
-
蔣介石基督敎信仰本質之考察 ― 以影片《宋氏三姐妹》中蔣介石讀經淸黨片段爲中心
중국어문학논집
2020 .02
-
韓國漢字音에 나타나는 i母音添加現象에 대하여 : 日本漢字音 · 越南漢字音과의 비교를 중심으로
일본문화학보
2015 .11
-
중국인민지원군 참전 초기, 모택동과 스탈린의 전략 충돌 연구
중국근현대사연구
2023 .03
-
카이로회담과 한중관계 - ‘國際共管論’에 대한 충칭임시정부와 중국국민정부의 대응 -
한국민족운동사연구
2015 .01
-
중화민국정부의 소련제소안 의결과 미국의 영향(1949-1952)
중국근현대사연구
2017 .09
-
동아시아 냉전체제 형성 시기의 한중관계 -李承晩과 蔣介石의 두 차례(1947년 4월, 1949년 8월) 만남을 중심으로-
역사학보
2025 .03
-
중일전쟁시기 소련의 대(對)중국 신용차관과 ‘역화(易貨)’교역
동북아역사논총
2023 .06
-
“얄타비밀협정”과 “중·소 우호동맹조약”의 체결
역사와 담론
2020 .01
-
냉전 시기 소련-북한의 비대칭동맹과 북한의 자주외교
슬라브硏究
2019 .01
-
베트남漢字音과의 비교를 통한 韓日漢字音의 字音體系 비교연구 - 聲類를 중심으로 -
일본어학연구
2020 .03
-
漢和辭典 效攝韻 字音 規定의 문제점
일어일문학연구
2016 .02
-
紫霞 申緯의 「東人論詩絶句三十五首」 다시 읽기
한국한문학연구
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
북한 무력 형성과 북소관계
기광서
중소연구
2004
.11
주한 미 군사 고문단 (MILITARY ADVISORS IN KOREA : KMAG IN PEACE AND WAR) BY MAJOR ROBERT K. SAWYER
편집부
군사
1983
.12
구소련 국가들의 주권에 대한 러시아 측 시각과 소비에트 시기 민족공화국의 법적 지위: 러시아 문명주의 역사관에 대한 일고찰
이광태
슬라브학보
2022
.12
유산된 중국적 세계질서 - 1940년대 전반 국민당 전후세계 구상을 중심으로
차태근
중어중문학
2022
.09
민주주의관과 민주주의 붕괴: 바이마르 공화국의 붕괴에 대한 재고찰
권형기
국제.지역연구
2022
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0