지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.12
- 수록면
- 85 - 117 (33page)
- DOI
- 10.46694/JSS.2022.12.37.4.85
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research examines the overall characteristics of the existential structures expressed by Dative+Infinitive Constructions (henceforth, DIC) including the compound negated form of ‘NÉ-+[Wh]-word+VINFINITIVE" in Russian. This topic has been in the center of many linguists’ interest from a perspective of syntax, semantics, construction grammar, and morphology, etc. This stressed negative expression ‘NÉ+[Wh]-word+VINFINITIVE form’, so-called traditionally ‘NE-K-I’, where K stands for [Wh]-word/interrogative, is closely related to various linguistic issues, such as personal-impersonal constructions, monoclausal-biclausal sentences, subjecthood, dative subject, control and binding, modality, and so on.
The goal of this paper is to clarify if or not the given DIC, including affirmative sentences and stressed negative expression ‘NÉ-’, is an existential sentence, and consequently a series of issues, i.e., the mechanism of case assignment, tense marking, and the role of infinitive that function as Free Relative Prominal/cluause(henceforth, FRP) in DIC.
First of all, affirmative existential constructions of DIC have the structure of "Dative+есть+[Wh]-wordFRP+ VINFINITIVE", where BEEXISTENTIAL "е сть" is indispensable. On the contrary, the negative existential constructions have the structure of ‘NÉ-[Wh]-word+VINFINITIVE", where BEEXISTENTIAL "есть" must be omitted because "есть" and ‘NÉ-’ are in the complementary distribution. The negated expression could be either "NÉ+[Wh]-word" or "NÉ+PREP+[Wh]-word". Infinitive, which consists of free relative clause with [Wh]-word, i.e., relative pronominal, is responsible for case assignment of [Wh]-word. The prefixal negative particle ‘NÉ’, having originated from "не есть > несть > нет> не [wh] > нé-[wh]", indicates ‘Negation of Existence’, which triggers the case shift of NOM/ACC > GEN. For instance, Мне есть где спать vs Мне (*есть) нéгде спать, Ему есть что делать vs. Ему (*есть) нéчего делать. When the particle "NÉ" is combined with a prepositional phrase (PP), it is not concerned with case assignment. For example, нéчего делать, нé о чем заниматься, and вам нé за что благодарить, etc.
Secondly, DIC proves to be a bi-clausal sentence in that tense marking occurs with "было" in front of infinitive verb that assigns case to its internal argument. This is associated with the issue whether "есть" is a matrix verb, or just tense-marking particle "было".
Apart from the above-mentioned, there is a variety of linguistic issues with DIC. Especially, dative subject of DIC is eligible for control, government and binding as well as nominative subject of normal sentences.
The goal of this paper is to clarify if or not the given DIC, including affirmative sentences and stressed negative expression ‘NÉ-’, is an existential sentence, and consequently a series of issues, i.e., the mechanism of case assignment, tense marking, and the role of infinitive that function as Free Relative Prominal/cluause(henceforth, FRP) in DIC.
First of all, affirmative existential constructions of DIC have the structure of "Dative+есть+[Wh]-wordFRP+ VINFINITIVE", where BEEXISTENTIAL "е сть" is indispensable. On the contrary, the negative existential constructions have the structure of ‘NÉ-[Wh]-word+VINFINITIVE", where BEEXISTENTIAL "есть" must be omitted because "есть" and ‘NÉ-’ are in the complementary distribution. The negated expression could be either "NÉ+[Wh]-word" or "NÉ+PREP+[Wh]-word". Infinitive, which consists of free relative clause with [Wh]-word, i.e., relative pronominal, is responsible for case assignment of [Wh]-word. The prefixal negative particle ‘NÉ’, having originated from "не есть > несть > нет> не [wh] > нé-[wh]", indicates ‘Negation of Existence’, which triggers the case shift of NOM/ACC > GEN. For instance, Мне есть где спать vs Мне (*есть) нéгде спать, Ему есть что делать vs. Ему (*есть) нéчего делать. When the particle "NÉ" is combined with a prepositional phrase (PP), it is not concerned with case assignment. For example, нéчего делать, нé о чем заниматься, and вам нé за что благодарить, etc.
Secondly, DIC proves to be a bi-clausal sentence in that tense marking occurs with "было" in front of infinitive verb that assigns case to its internal argument. This is associated with the issue whether "есть" is a matrix verb, or just tense-marking particle "было".
Apart from the above-mentioned, there is a variety of linguistic issues with DIC. Especially, dative subject of DIC is eligible for control, government and binding as well as nominative subject of normal sentences.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 본론
III. 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
준조동사 ‘BE TO’ 구문에 대한 통사적 분석: 의미와 문법기능의 관점에서
영어학연구
2017 .01
-
A Diachronic Study of the English Perfect Passive
영어학연구
2017 .01
-
한국인 L2화자의 여격 구문 인식에 관한 연구
새한영어영문학
2015 .08
-
러시아어 존재문의 의미구조: 소유와 질적 정체성의 문제 - у Х (есть) Y 구문을 중심으로
러시아어문학연구논집
2015 .01
-
Three Types of the Infinitive: Diachronic Change and Synchronic Variation
언어연구
2015 .01
-
Syntactic Distribution of the Semantic Classes of Dative Verbs in English and Cantonese: A Crosslinguistic Perspective
언어
2021 .06
-
스페인어의 동사원형과 정관사 el에 관한 고찰
언어와언어학
2020 .01
-
러시아어 ‘위협’의 여격 표지
슬라브학보
2015 .12
-
부정사절의 용법활용과 이해도 연구
영미어문학
2019 .01
-
한국어 모어 화자와 학습자의 여격 구문 문장 처리 연구
국어국문학
2023 .12
-
헝가리어 부정사구 InfP의 통사구조：PRO와 pro
언어와언어학
2021 .01
-
On the Syntactic Status of English Dative Idioms
영어영문학
2021 .08
-
The Effects of Cross-linguistic Influence on the Use of English Dative Constructions in Second Language Written Production
Corpus Linguistics Research
2020 .01
-
인상구문의 여격 간섭효과에 대한 비교연구
언어과학
2016 .01
-
Variation in Double Object Formation with Dative Verbs: English vs. Korean
영어학
2021 .01
-
A diachronic analysis of to-infinitives in English
언어과학연구
2024 .09
-
러시아어 존재문에서 객체와 공간의 상관성과 존재양상: 시간성과 한정성의 문제
러시아어문학연구논집
2017 .01
-
역대기 칠십인역 번역에 있어서 동사 형태의 특징 : 부정사 연계형과 절대형을 중심으로
성경원문연구
2016 .10
-
A Lexical Feature-based Analysis for the English Dative Alternation
영어영문학
2019 .11
-
The Corpus-Based Synchro-Diachronic Approach to the Split Infinitives in English
언어학 연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0