메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이용훈 (충남대학교) 김지혜 (한국교원대학교)
저널정보
경희대학교 언어정보연구소 언어연구 언어연구 제39권 제3호
발행연도
2022.12
수록면
467 - 497 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The study investigated two types of subjecthood diagnostics in Korean using two different kinds of approaches. Based on the previous studies on subjecthood diagnostics in Korean, this paper examined the two subjecthood diagnostics: Honorific Agreement (HA) and Plural Copying (PC). For the experimental analysis, this study adopted the analysis results of Kim et al. (2017). For the deep learning analysis, this paper employed the KR-BERT for the deep learning model and three sources of data sets: the Korean version of the Corpus of Linguistic Acceptability (K-CoLA), the Sejong Morphologically-Analyzed Corpus, and the extended target sentences of Kim et al. (2017). Two separate experiments were conducted in the deep learning analysis. In the first experiment, the KR-BERT was trained only with the K-CoLA, and the target sentences were analyzed. In the second experiment, the KR-BERT was trained with the K-CoLA and the sentences from the Sejong corpus, and the acceptability scores of the target sentences were measured. The acceptability scores were measured with the numeric scores using the algorithms in Lee (2021). After the experiments with the deep learning models, the scores were normalized and were statistically analyzed with Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). Through the two experiments, the following fact was observed: both HA and PC did not show similar tendencies of experimental results with human participants in the first experiment, but they did in the second experiment. The analysis results demonstrated that both HA and PC could be used as subjecthood diagnostics but that they played significant roles only when native speakers were exposed to enough examples.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0