지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With the advent of the Free Trade Agreement between Korea and the U.S. and an increase in trade volume between the two countries, the possibility of commercial disputes has escalated among international merchants. It has been well-known that arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution is an efficient way to resolve international commercial disputes. When arbitral awards are enforced in the judicial system, the court will inevitably have to be involved with the enforcement procedures. The court is a typical legal entity to confirm arbitral awards. Through a confirmation process, the winning party obtains the same legal status of final judgment rendered by the court. However, a winning party in arbitration will have to overcome a legal hurdle in the enforcement process of arbitral awards. This article aims to investigate how the courts control the arbitration practices and what the basic legal issues in the enforcement of arbitral awards are. The US Federal Arbitration Act is investigated, while relevant cases are reviewed and updated for legal analysis.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler–Plymouth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614 (1985)
Ottley v. Schwartzberg, 819 F.2d 373, 376 (2d Cir. 1987)
Paula ANDREWS, COUNTY OF ROCKLAND, appellant., 120 A.D.3d 1227(2014)
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS, State of NEW YORK, 420 F.Supp.3d 89, (2019)
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 177 v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, 966 F.3d 245, (United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.2020)
Ottley v. Schwartzberg, 819 F.2d 373, 376 (2d Cir. 1987)
Paula ANDREWS, COUNTY OF ROCKLAND, appellant., 120 A.D.3d 1227(2014)
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS, State of NEW YORK, 420 F.Supp.3d 89, (2019)
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 177 v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, 966 F.3d 245, (United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.2020)
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Significance of the Language of Arbitration Agreements – Focusing on the recent U.S. court's decision denying confirmation of arbitral award in Spineway SA v. Strategos Group LLC
중재연구
2024 .09
-
The Challenge of Arbitral Awards in Pakistan
중재연구
2017 .01
-
Analysis, Recognition and Enforcement Procedures of Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States
중재연구
2017 .01
-
Interim Measures in Arbitration and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Korea and China
중재연구
2016 .01
-
외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행에 관한 중국의 실행
법학연구
2019 .08
-
Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards under England Arbitration Act
중재연구
2021 .09
-
Scrutiny of Arbitral Awards by Arbitration Institutions in International Arbitration: Focusing on the ICC’s Scrutiny of Award Process
법과정책
2017 .08
-
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Incompatible with the Korean Procedural Framework
중재연구
2020 .09
-
베트남 법체계에 있어서 외국중재판정 승인 및 집행
중재연구
2021 .03
-
독일민사소송법상 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행- ｢독일민사소송법｣ 제1061조를 중심으로 -
중재연구
2019 .01
-
在中国法视角下研究仲裁裁决的效力 - 以仲裁裁决的实质效力为中心
국제법무
2016 .05
-
The Provisions on the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Indonesia (under the New York Convention of 1958?)
중재연구
2017 .01
-
A Study on Judicial Review on Foreign Arbitral Awards in China
한국무역학회 학술대회
2023 .08
-
러시아에 있어서 외국 중재판정의 집행 거부에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2015 .02
-
중재판정의 집행결정절차에 관한 검토
사법
2019 .01
-
2016년 개정 중재법의 중재판정 집행에 관한 문제점
중재연구
2016 .01
-
Application of Terms of “Fraud and Corruption” in a Recent Amendment of Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act
한국부패학회보
2022 .09
-
국제상사분쟁해결방법으로서의 국제중재에 관하여 — 실무적 절차의 흐름과 장단점을 중심으로 —
법학연구
2017 .01
-
中国国际商事仲裁协议效力认定问题研究
중재연구
2018 .01
-
Enforcement of Annulled Arbitral awards in Korea: Where are We and Where Should We Go?
Journal of Korean Law
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0