메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Kim Jin-man (Korea Army Academy at Yeongchoen Yeongchoen Republic of Korea)
저널정보
J-INSTITUTE Robotics & AI Ethics Robotics & AI Ethics Vol.1 No.2
발행연도
2016.12
수록면
1 - 8 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
What I wish to show in this paper is to inquire whether we can justify war or not by using these normative ethical systems, if possible, what the logic justifying the war is. Teleological ethics and deontological ethics are often contrasted with one another on the basis of the general type of ethical system each exemplifies. Utilitarianism is one of the teleological ethical system, while formalism is typical of deontological ethical system. The distinction between the two kinds of system may be conveniently summarized as follows; a teleological theory holds that an action is morally right either if a person's doing it brings about good consequences, or if the action is of a kind which if everyone did it, would have good consequences. It is ultimately the goodness or badness of the consequences of action. In Deontological theory, it is right if it accords with a moral rule, wrong if it violates such a rule. Moral rules are based on an ultimate principle of duty which, in contrast to teleological ethics, does not specify an end or purpose whose furtherance makes actions right. What the ultimate principle specifies is a set of conditions that are necessary and sufficient for any rule of moral obligation to apply to a kind of action. Consequentialist pacifism is usually grounded in some sort of rule-utilitarianism. A utilitarian pacifist may argue that a rule against war or other sorts of violence will tend to promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number. According to the principle of proportionality, although violence is evil, if we may suffer greater other evil than the evil, the violence which eliminates relatively the previous smaller evil could be justified. A broader prohibition against violence other than war can extend the ‘greatest happiness’ concept to take into account the happiness of sentient beings other than humans. Deontological ethical system, as a formal ethical model, is the older of the two, with the best-recorded example of antiquity being divine command theory. This theory states that an action is good or evil depending on whether it corresponds to rules set by a deity. The most famous theory of deontological ethics is Kant's. Kant's categorical imperative is formulated as follows: “Act according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”. It is difficult to supply content to Kant’s imperative. Thus, it is not clear that the Kantian imperative can be used to rule out war. Indeed, Kant is a defender of a version of the just war theory, in part because he believes that states have a duty to defend their citizens. Although Kant is not himself a pacifist, one might be able to ground pacifism in Kant's alternative version of the moral law: “Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only” All human being has the autonomy of the will explained as the concept of freedom. If men have freedom of the will then they must be obligated to obey the categorical imperative. Thus whoever has freedom of the will should take responsibility for his behavior, unless he won’t do. And as this can be universalized and applied to men with reason, anyone who violates moral law should be punished to preserve the life in community. This principle of deontological ethical system is extended to the conduct of human being in war.
#Justice #Teleology #Deontology #Principle #Proportionality

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청
Smart JJ / 1973 / Utilitarianism / Cambridge Univer-sity google schola Talyor Paul W / 1975 / Principles of Ethics: An Intro-duction / Dickenson google schola Hartnack / 1968 / Justus Kant’s Theory of Knowledge / Macmillan google schola Kant I / 1986 / Fundamental Principles of the Meta-physic of Morals / University of Chicago google schola Kim JM / 2016 / The Justification of War Viewed from Ethical Perspectives / International Jour-nal of Military Affairs 1(1):29~30 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0