메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이정민 (중국문화대학)
저널정보
한국동서비교문학학회 동서비교문학저널 동서비교문학저널 제65호
발행연도
2023.9
수록면
167 - 189 (23page)
DOI
10.29324/jewcl.2023.9.65.167

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study critically examines the reception of psychoanalysis during the Korean War, which has previously been explored primarily through contextual evidence. In 1949, the U.S. military institutionalized lessons from military psychiatry extracted from past wars. Psychoanalysis, as a dominant psychiatric approach at the time, wielded significant influence in the formulation of these lessons, and the impact of “therapy” within the U.S. military was remarkable. The probability of soldiers returning to the frontlines increased significantly compared to before the implementation of therapy, and frontline commanders could better manage combat readiness. With the outbreak of the Korean War, the U.S. military extended these methods to Korean military officers, marking the inception of psychoanalysis in Korean psychiatry.
However, the situation in the Korean military was not smooth. Whether officers or soldiers, very few had access to mental treatment, and suffering was largely left to individual service members. While measures were taken on the frontlines to prevent mental breakdown among soldiers following the established protocols, many continued to suffer in the aftermath of the war. While efforts were made by Korean military psychiatrists and officers, their options were limited in the Korea of that era, which was essentially a barren land for psychiatry. It is clear that Korean military officers contributed significantly to the post-war development of psychiatry in Korea. However, it’s important to remember that many soldiers endured mental anguish without receiving any help.
Therefore, psychoanalysis as a form of military psychiatry during that era could be evaluated as a temporary reconciliation strategy that aimed to sustain soldiers’ combat readiness on the frontlines rather than a complete therapeutic solution. Its effects were short-term, and thus, it couldn’t prevent veterans from suffering mental anguish until their deaths. The presence of individuals haunted by trauma lies beneath the broader progress of Korean society, and their contribution to shaping today’s Korea despite their suffering provides substantial insights for our reflections on Korea today.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 전쟁과 정신분석학: 제2차 세계대전과 한국전쟁에서
Ⅲ. 한국전쟁과 정신분석학의 착종
Ⅳ. 전후와 트라우마
Ⅴ. 결론을 대신하여
Works Cited

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088087098