지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第164輯
- 발행연도
- 2023.9
- 수록면
- 397 - 438 (42page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2023.9.164.397
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Some of the Mongol historical records compiled in the 17th century have puzzled scholars, as they refer to Küten, a son of Ögedei, as a Great Khan. Küten was a prince who remained so until his death.
While stationed in the ancient land of Xixia, he sent an army to Central Tibet and summoned the head of the Sakyapa sect as a representative of Tibet. A famous Sakyapa lama, Sakya Pandita, came as a delegate. He improved Küten’s health and even manifested that Küten was the reincarnation of a former Xixia Emperor. Küten would have been well aware that the nobility of Xixia revered Tibetan Buddhism and he also developed a deep belief in Tibetan Buddhism through Sakya Pandita. He also granted authority to the Sakyapa sect to govern Tibet while the specifics are not clear.
After the Mongol imperial position transitioned from the Ögödeids to the Toluids, a son of Tolui, Khubilai, upon hearing of the reputation of Sakya Pandita, requested that he be sent to his presence. Küten’s son brought his disciple and nephew Phagpa, citing the elderly age of the lama. Khubilai was initially disappointed by the arrival of the nephew but, upon hearing teachings on Buddhist doctrine from the young man, he also became his disciple. Now, the partnership with the Sakyapa sect has shifted from Küten to Khubilai. After many twists and turns, Khubilai rose to the position of the Great Khan and appointed Phagpa as the Imperial Preceptor, a system that continued until the end of the Empire.
The records of the Sakyapa during the Mongol Empire era are not currently available, but we can see that records of them from the 15th century onwards refer to Küten as “rgyal po,” meaning “Emperor” or “Great Khan.” Küten was the first Mongol royal member who established the official relationship between the Mongols and Tibet, and by inviting the Sakyapa lama as a representative, he was recorded as “Great Khan Küten” by the Sakyapa sect, who elevated their own authority through this title.
More than 200 years after fleeing north due to the Ming army’s pursuit, the Mongols once again embraced Tibetan Buddhism and received their own history in reverse from Sakya lamas, recording it as it was. This process was the background that confused scholars.
While stationed in the ancient land of Xixia, he sent an army to Central Tibet and summoned the head of the Sakyapa sect as a representative of Tibet. A famous Sakyapa lama, Sakya Pandita, came as a delegate. He improved Küten’s health and even manifested that Küten was the reincarnation of a former Xixia Emperor. Küten would have been well aware that the nobility of Xixia revered Tibetan Buddhism and he also developed a deep belief in Tibetan Buddhism through Sakya Pandita. He also granted authority to the Sakyapa sect to govern Tibet while the specifics are not clear.
After the Mongol imperial position transitioned from the Ögödeids to the Toluids, a son of Tolui, Khubilai, upon hearing of the reputation of Sakya Pandita, requested that he be sent to his presence. Küten’s son brought his disciple and nephew Phagpa, citing the elderly age of the lama. Khubilai was initially disappointed by the arrival of the nephew but, upon hearing teachings on Buddhist doctrine from the young man, he also became his disciple. Now, the partnership with the Sakyapa sect has shifted from Küten to Khubilai. After many twists and turns, Khubilai rose to the position of the Great Khan and appointed Phagpa as the Imperial Preceptor, a system that continued until the end of the Empire.
The records of the Sakyapa during the Mongol Empire era are not currently available, but we can see that records of them from the 15th century onwards refer to Küten as “rgyal po,” meaning “Emperor” or “Great Khan.” Küten was the first Mongol royal member who established the official relationship between the Mongols and Tibet, and by inviting the Sakyapa lama as a representative, he was recorded as “Great Khan Küten” by the Sakyapa sect, who elevated their own authority through this title.
More than 200 years after fleeing north due to the Ming army’s pursuit, the Mongols once again embraced Tibetan Buddhism and received their own history in reverse from Sakya lamas, recording it as it was. This process was the background that confused scholars.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 쿠텐 울루스의 성립과 중앙티베트 침입
Ⅲ. 사꺄파, 쿠텐에서 쿠빌라이로
Ⅳ. “대칸” 쿠텐
Ⅴ. 結論
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
티베트 사료의 한국 관련 기록 고찰
동양사학연구
2019 .12
-
What It Means to Be a Tibetan in India? On Consequences of Creating the Unified Pan-Tibetan Identity
Localities
2016 .11
-
역사서술의 변천으로 본 中國의 티베트와 西藏－3종 『西藏通史』들의 출판을 중심으로－
史叢(사총)
2023 .05
-
东方朔人物形象演变研究
중국어문학지
2019 .01
-
몽골제국 시기 티베트의 역참 운용 연구
동양사학연구
2022 .09
-
시짱(西藏) 캉바장족(康巴藏族) 전통궈좡무(鍋莊舞)의 민속무용학적 가치
남도민속연구
2020 .01
-
티베트 승가교육의 교과과정
禪學(선학)
2020 .01
-
아라이(阿來) 소설에 나타난 티베트에 대한 상상과 기억에 관한 연구 - 소설 『格拉長大』와 『空山』을 중심으로 -
세계문학비교연구
2019 .01
-
『티베트, 은밀한 세월(西藏, 隱秘歲月)』 속 숨겨진 역사와 티베트인의 정체성 연구
중국학
2024 .09
-
대칸의 스승: 팍빠("Phags pa, 八思巴, 1235-1280)와 그의 시대
동양사학연구
2021 .06
-
From the “Cool and Pure” to the “Hot and Bothered” – The ‘Heterodox’ Buddhist Poetics of Hanshan Deqing.
禪學(선학)
2018 .01
-
朴承任의 학문적 지향과 16세기 영주지역의 ‘集團知性’
영남학
2019 .01
-
선교사의 눈에 비친 티베트— 아폴리토 데시데리(IppoIito Desideri, 1684-1733)의 선교활동과 티베트불교에 대한 인식
인문논총
2016 .01
-
원 간섭기 고려 왕실의 티베트불교 수용과 밀교의례의 확산
이화사학연구
2017 .01
-
19世紀 畵僧 瑞輝 佛畵의 特徵과 意義
문화사학
2018 .12
-
페마 체덴(Pema Tseden), 혹은 완마차이단(萬瑪才旦) : 중국 티벳 청년감독의 어떤 자화상
중국문화연구
2015 .02
-
유럽과 미국의 티베트학(Tibetology), 성과와 과제
동북아역사논총
2018 .06
-
The Great Tibetan Funerary Tradition: Tibetan Deathscapes in the Past, Present, and the Future
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2023 .12
-
한어역사음운학의 영역으로 진입하고 있는 한장어비교연구 (하)
중국어문논역총간
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0