메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
한영림 (경북대학교)
저널정보
한국셰익스피어학회 Shakespeare Review Shakespeare Review Vol.60 No.1
발행연도
2024.2
수록면
59 - 81 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study attempts to give an account of the two screen representations of Shakespeare in the context of the theme of familylessness: All Is True, a 2018 British film and Cymbeline, a 2014 American film. The state of being familyless represented in them is bound up with that of being fatherless, which is inseparable from that of being childless. The study intends to underline the similarity between these two movies, that is, the portrayal of a father who is disheartened by the absence of a male heir and unable to form a father and daughter bond, thereby providing discourage and disorientation where there is family conflict. Both films weigh what an effect the absence of a father figure has on his family, but at the same time they envision family life about transformation. In the beginning the image of a father depicted in them is bound by tradition, by authority, and by the notion that he defines as to how the family should be like. As the film progresses, the father of the family is in the process of discovery and realization. His attitude of mind veers off in a different direction, due to the situations that test and push him further. The two films reinforce how devastating everything in a family conflict is, and how reassuring everything in a family reconciliation is. In those terms they can be seen as testimony to a recognition that there is little in the family that is not directly comprehensible.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0