지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국사연구회 한국사연구 韓國史硏究 제204집
- 발행연도
- 2024.3
- 수록면
- 109 - 148 (40page)
- DOI
- 10.31791/JKH.2024.3.204.109
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
An important narrative in Lee Ki-baek"s Korean historical narrative is the process of expansion of social dominant/leading power. In this narrative, “despotism” and “nobility” are important concepts, but they were not clearly defined, which caused controversy. Specifically, contradictions between the overall narrative structure and specific expressions are confirmed. Despotism was a subject of avoidance in the expansion narrative of the dominant/leading power but was expressed as stability and development in individual narratives. The absence of a conceptual definition was pointed out as the cause for the contradiction. Although Lee Ki-Baek tried to make up for deficiencies in the concept by quoting modern intellectuals such as Yu Kil-Chun and An Hwak, but still there were misunderstanding and misreading. Yu Kil-Chun"s concept of despotism did not correspond to Lee Ki-Baek"s concept because it meant a reign of terror without laws and regulations since Montesquieu. An Hwak"s concept of nobility is a special political form of the Heian period in Japan borrowed by Naito Konan, and it refers to a maternal relative that transcends the monarch and seizes power similar to aristocratic politics, so this also does not correspond to Lee Ki-Baek"s concept.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 이기백의 ‘한국사체계’, 그 서사와 표현 간의 모순
Ⅲ. ‘전제(專制)’, 번역의 착종
Ⅳ. ‘귀족(貴族)’, 개념의 변용
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0