메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
황훼이민 김진웅 (경북대학교)
저널정보
담화·인지언어학회 담화와인지 담화와인지 제31권 제3호
발행연도
2024.8
수록면
31 - 50 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, 90 discussion papers from academic conferences related to Korean humanities and Korean language education were analyzed, referring to the framework of politeness strategies used in Hyland (2000)’s review of criticism. The analysis focused on the patterns and types of politeness strategies used in criticism in the discussion papers. The research results can be summarized into four main points. First, criticism appeared 465 times in 90 discussion papers, which means it occurred in 27.9% of all sentences. Second, 16.8% of criticisms were made without the use of politeness strategies, while 83.2% involved the use of politeness strategies when criticizing. Third, politeness strategies used in the discussion papers were classified into eight categories, including ‘praise-criticism’, ‘hedging’, ‘personal attribution’, ‘requesting opinions/thoughts of others’, ‘self-denigration’, ‘expressing respect’, ‘asking for understanding’ and ‘recasting problems as potential for future research’. Fourth, it was found that the politeness strategies used in the discussion papers of Korean academic conferences, particularly when critiquing, have similarities and differences when compared to the politeness strategies used in reviews or academic writing in other languages such as English, Italian, and Japanese. These findings suggest that linguistic and cultural backgrounds may influence the degree and manner in which criticism is accepted and expressed.

목차

1. 서론
2. 이론적 논의
3. 연구 방법
4. 연구 결과 분석
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-090264434