메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
오신유 (Chung-Ang University) 이진화 (Chung-Ang University)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.24
발행연도
2024.1
수록면
953 - 978 (26page)
DOI
10.15738/kjell.24..202409.953

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper conducts a critical interpretative synthesis of 31 studies that investigated feedback on English writing in the context of Korean elementary and secondary school education from 2000 to 2024. A systematic review was conducted focusing on three aspects: 1) study distribution and research methods, 2) the effects of feedback and mediating factors on English writing ability, and 3) learners’ perceptions of feedback and its mediating factors. The majority of studies concentrated on high school and elementary school students, with a predominance of mixed and quantitative methods. Feedback was primarily provided by teachers in a written offline mode. The relative effects of various feedback types on English writing, typically measured by students’ performance on revised texts and/or independent English writing tests, varied depending on school levels, proficiency levels, and target language areas. Overall, direct feedback was beneficial for and preferred by elementary school students, especially those with low proficiency, for correcting simple errors. In contrast, higher-level students favored indirect feedback, which allowed them to self-correct errors. Additionally, high school students benefited more from meaning-focused feedback rather than form-focused feedback in correcting complex structures. Overall, learners experienced increased achievement, interest, and confidence when addressing their errors through feedback. This paper concludes by suggesting potential topics for further research and pedagogical implications based on these findings.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
3. 연구방법
4. 결과
5. 요약 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0