지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study examines four major theories on the origins of Zion theology and explores how Zion theology developed and evolved over time. By analyzing the origins of Zion theology from a diachronic perspective, the study aims to assess the validity and limitations of each theory.
The study is structured around four main theories. First, the Jebusite origin theory suggests that a tradition of Zion’s inviolability existed among the Jebusites prior to the conquest of Jerusalem, which David subsequently integrated into Israelite religion. This theory supports the idea that Zion was regarded as a religious center before David and later
established as a political center. Second, the Isaiah origin theory argues that the failure of Sennacherib’s siege of Jerusalem in 701 BCE established Zion as a sacred site under divine protection. This theory posits that Zion theology developed as a symbol of divine protection against external threats to Israel. Third, the Shiloh-Ark origin theory views David’s transfer of the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem as pivotal to the formation of Zion theology. As the Ark was brought to Jerusalem, Zion became a symbol of God’s presence and protection, thereby reinforcing its role as a religious center. Lastly, the David-Solomon origin theory attributes the establishment of Zion theology to David’s conquest of Jerusalem and Solomon’s construction of the Temple, solidifying Zion as both the political capital and religious center of Israel.
The study concludes that the David-Solomon origin theory offers the most compelling explanation for the origins of Zion theology. During the reigns of David and Solomon, Zion theology became a central element in the political and theological identity of Israel. This tradition, which developed into a complex ideology over subsequent historical events, emphasizes the importance of a diachronic approach, showing that Zion theology is a multilayered tradition shaped and reinterpreted across various periods and events. As such, Zion theology remains an essential topic for understanding the political and religious identity of ancient Israel.
The study is structured around four main theories. First, the Jebusite origin theory suggests that a tradition of Zion’s inviolability existed among the Jebusites prior to the conquest of Jerusalem, which David subsequently integrated into Israelite religion. This theory supports the idea that Zion was regarded as a religious center before David and later
established as a political center. Second, the Isaiah origin theory argues that the failure of Sennacherib’s siege of Jerusalem in 701 BCE established Zion as a sacred site under divine protection. This theory posits that Zion theology developed as a symbol of divine protection against external threats to Israel. Third, the Shiloh-Ark origin theory views David’s transfer of the Ark of the Covenant to Jerusalem as pivotal to the formation of Zion theology. As the Ark was brought to Jerusalem, Zion became a symbol of God’s presence and protection, thereby reinforcing its role as a religious center. Lastly, the David-Solomon origin theory attributes the establishment of Zion theology to David’s conquest of Jerusalem and Solomon’s construction of the Temple, solidifying Zion as both the political capital and religious center of Israel.
The study concludes that the David-Solomon origin theory offers the most compelling explanation for the origins of Zion theology. During the reigns of David and Solomon, Zion theology became a central element in the political and theological identity of Israel. This tradition, which developed into a complex ideology over subsequent historical events, emphasizes the importance of a diachronic approach, showing that Zion theology is a multilayered tradition shaped and reinterpreted across various periods and events. As such, Zion theology remains an essential topic for understanding the political and religious identity of ancient Israel.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 시온신학의 기원설
3. 나가는 말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
도시와 성전 - 시온 신학의 기원에 관한 연구 -
구약논단
2020 .06
-
‘세계의 어머니’로서의 시온 : 시편 87편에 대한 주석적 연구
장신논단
2015 .06
-
미가서의 문학적 통일성: 시온을 향한 심판과 소망의 이중주
구약논단
2025 .03
-
이스라엘 사회 통합을 위한 다윗의 정치 : 종교적 조처들
구약논단
2017 .12
-
예레미야서 빛으로 읽는 애가서 신학
성경과 신학
2017 .01
-
가루베 지온(輕部慈恩)은 문화재 도둑, n'est-ce pas?
백제연구
2024 .08
-
이스라엘의 구원을 말하는 로마서 11장 25-26절에 대한 연구
신약논단
2016 .03
-
예레미야 31장 23-40절에 나타난 새 언약과 이스라엘과 유다의 통일 이상
선교와 신학
2018 .10
-
한국학의 주제로서의 신학: 그 가능성과 전망
가톨릭신학
2015 .01
-
성전에 올라가는 노래 (시편 120-134)의 구성적 주석적 연구
ACTS 신학저널
2021 .12
-
신학의 원초적 방법론으로서의 ‘철학적 신학’ : 신학과 인간학(즉, 철학)의 관계를 중심으로
인문학연구
2018 .06
-
후기 북한 사회의 기독교 신학 구성에 대한 서설 : 후기 공산주의 사회들의 기독교 신학의 변화를 중심으로
신학연구
2016 .06
-
이사야 63:7-64:11의 공동체 탄식 기도
구약논집
2021 .12
-
The Commonalities and Divergences between Asian Theology and Latin American Theology: Focused on the Notion of Liberation
신학과 선교
2017 .05
-
조선의 운명과 남 유다의 멸망에 대한 정치, 경제, 종교적 관점의 비교 연구: 예레미야서를 중심으로
구약논단
2023 .03
-
춘계 이종성의 통전적 신학에서 신학과 철학의 관계에 대한 연구
장신논단
2016 .03
-
퀴어-페미니스트 관점에서 한 권의 책으로 읽는 이사야서
구약논단
2022 .06
-
한국 신학의 유형화에 관한 고찰: ‘K-신학의 방법론’을 지향하며
한국기독교신학논총
2024 .10
-
Zion speaks in Isaiah 61:1-3a
신학논단
2022 .03
-
기독교 자연신학의 가능성과 현실성 -칼빈의 자연이해를 중심으로-
조직신학연구
2019 .01
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092231803