지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 중국어문학연구회 중국어문학논집 中國語文學論集 第149號
- 발행연도
- 2024.12
- 수록면
- 83 - 106 (24page)
- DOI
- 10.25021/JCLL.2024.12.149.83
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzed the colloquial characteristics of Chinese kinship terms through comparison and contrast with Korean. The results are as follows.
As a result of analyzing the types of colloquial kinship terms, this paper found that the frequency of use of the NN type was relatively low. And the rate of use of the monosyllabic type and the DN type is high as an alternative. In a situation where most Chinese learners perceive the NN type as a basic type in the process of acquiring kinship terms, this phenomenon requires an in-depth discussion. This paper defines it as an “NN-type avoidance phenomenon” and analyzes the cause.
First, in terms of semantic color, the NN type has the characteristics of infant language or formal style at the same time. In particular, due to the characteristics of the formal style, the NN type gives a sense of distance to use in everyday life. This results in adult speakers preferring monosyllabic or DN types when referring to their families in their daily lives.
Second, in the kinship terminology system, the difference from Korean is remarkable in terms of morphology. Unlike Korean, the DN type entails adjectives and possessive properties. This difference is due to the difference in the cognitive systems of the two languages. Chinese is based on a personalized viewpoint, and Korean is based on a shared viewpoint.
Third, the reason for the high rate of use of the DN type is the weakening of the Determiner and the Rhyme. The meaning of the Determiner does not work significantly in the actual speech. Meanwhile, Chinese has two syllables as its basic phonetic composition. However, avoidance of the use of the NN type causes a rhyming void in the kinship term system. As a result, the DN type was used as a substitute, and the reduction in the semantic constraint of weakening Determiner is considered to have become a mechanism for more universal use of the DN type.
As a result of analyzing the types of colloquial kinship terms, this paper found that the frequency of use of the NN type was relatively low. And the rate of use of the monosyllabic type and the DN type is high as an alternative. In a situation where most Chinese learners perceive the NN type as a basic type in the process of acquiring kinship terms, this phenomenon requires an in-depth discussion. This paper defines it as an “NN-type avoidance phenomenon” and analyzes the cause.
First, in terms of semantic color, the NN type has the characteristics of infant language or formal style at the same time. In particular, due to the characteristics of the formal style, the NN type gives a sense of distance to use in everyday life. This results in adult speakers preferring monosyllabic or DN types when referring to their families in their daily lives.
Second, in the kinship terminology system, the difference from Korean is remarkable in terms of morphology. Unlike Korean, the DN type entails adjectives and possessive properties. This difference is due to the difference in the cognitive systems of the two languages. Chinese is based on a personalized viewpoint, and Korean is based on a shared viewpoint.
Third, the reason for the high rate of use of the DN type is the weakening of the Determiner and the Rhyme. The meaning of the Determiner does not work significantly in the actual speech. Meanwhile, Chinese has two syllables as its basic phonetic composition. However, avoidance of the use of the NN type causes a rhyming void in the kinship term system. As a result, the DN type was used as a substitute, and the reduction in the semantic constraint of weakening Determiner is considered to have become a mechanism for more universal use of the DN type.
목차
1. 들어가기
2. 선행연구 분석
3. 가족 지칭어 유형 분석
4. “NN형” 회피 현상 분석
5. 나가기
參考文獻
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
친족어 {아저씨}, {아주머니}·{아줌마}의 비친족어로서의 확장·사용 양상
언어
2018 .03
-
러시아 친족용어의 사회언어학적 연구: 인척 관계를 중심으로
외국학연구
2021 .01
-
한국어 친족 호칭어 체계의 문제점과 개선 방향
어문학
2018 .09
-
현대 중국어 가족 지칭어의 구어적 특징 고찰
한국중어중문학회 학술대회 자료집
2024 .11
-
조선족의 친족관계와 친족이념 : 가족의 일상생활ㆍ이동ㆍ의례를 통한 고찰
통일인문학
2015 .12
-
한국어 복합구성 친족어의 친족 관계 표지 요소에 대하여
국어문학
2022 .03
-
汉韩亲属称谓语“哥(오빠/형)”的泛化对比及跨文化研究
중국문화연구
2017 .05
-
흑수백산지구 소남산문화 ‘적석단총-옥석기문화’의 요서지구 소하서문화∼흥륭와문화로의 전파
유라시아문화
2022 .08
-
조선후기 한 지방양반의 친족연결망 －海南尹氏 尹爾厚 친족의 사례 검토－
태동고전연구
2017 .01
-
從新詞語中的親屬稱謂汎化現象管窺近年的中國社會 - 以2008-2020年《中國語言生活狀況報告》中的新詞語爲對象
중국어문학논집
2021 .12
-
The Critical Social Turn of Queer Korean Cinema : Hospitality and the Temporal Economy of Queer Kinship in The Bacchus Lady (2016)
Korea Journal
2018 .06
-
중국 소수민족 친족호칭어의 사회언어학적 연구 ― 중국⋅티베트어족(漢藏語系) 언어를 중심으로
중국어문학지
2023 .03
-
曹雪芹의 『紅樓夢』에 출현하는 호칭어의 양상 연구
중국문화연구
2019 .08
-
알리기 위한 지역학, 알고 싶은 지역학 - 미국 내 한국학 수업 풍경과 연구 동향
역사비평
2021 .11
-
족계의 중층적 증식 : 20세기 부계 친족 조직의 확산과 상호 관계
비교문화연구
2024 .12
-
한일간 호칭어의 대조연구 : 집단 토크쇼 방송을 중심으로
일본어학연구
2017 .03
-
中國 姻戚呼稱 考察 ―同壻관계 호칭을 중심으로
중국학논총
2019 .01
-
A Study on NNS Teachers’ Language Awareness
Journal of Asia TEFL
2018 .01
-
모녀 간 친밀성 서사의 젠더 정치 - 오정희와 백수린의 사례를 중심으로
어문논총
2019 .08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092097874