메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조병화 (거제대학교)
저널정보
한국T.S.엘리엇학회 T. S. 엘리엇연구 T. S. 엘리엇연구 제34권 제1호
발행연도
2024.7
수록면
131 - 152 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The definitions of modernism in general revolves around reason-centeredness but literary modernism involves serious revolts against it. The latter was significantly transformed by many later opposing trends, mainly by Romanticism. The complexity of literary modernism was aggravated with T. S. Eliot being its central figure, who experimented with new literary techniques but, ironically enough, wanted to return to the ways and values of the past. This is a critical challenge against the basic principle of modernism, breaking away from the past and concentrating on the present without restrictions from the past. Eliot showed how a poet can record his time with new literary devices including fragmented and non-logical arrangements, presentations of undefinable objects, and non-definite depictions of them; he also adopted techniques such as collage, juxtaposition, and internal monologues which also are meant to show new discoveries and new ways of thinking of his time. This discrepancy between techniques and themes in Eliot features his literature and requires an effort to integrate them on the part of his reader, amplifying the difficultly involved in understanding modernism. This writing is meant to review T. S. Eliot’s modernism in comparison with the poetry of Yu Chihwan, one of Eliot’s Korean contemporaries with focus on treatments of emotion and personality, poetic dictions, and themes, the last of which will be viewed from how keenly aware they were of given historical settings.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0