지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 성균관대학교 유교문화연구소 Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture Vol.43
- 발행연도
- 2025.2
- 수록면
- 111 - 133 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.22916/jcpc.2025..43.111
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper argues that besides the two popular global justice theories, cosmopolitainsim and nationalism, the Confucian idea of tianxia 天下 (“All Under Heaven”) presents an alternative view. Cosmopolitanism focuses on individuals as the ultimate agents of the global community, while nationalism recognizes nations and states as the ultimate agents. The idea of tianxia can be understood as a version of cosmopolitanism that values the great unity and human love. Tianxia can also be read as a version of nationalism that prioritizes partial love. In this paper I argue that tianxia should be treated as a unique version of statist compomopolitanism that insists on the priority of states but pursues global peace and development. However, tianxia does not treat states as mere instruments. It does not endorse the egalitarian aspirations either.
In the first section, I introduce the debate between cosmopolitanism and nationalism. In the second section, I present major arguments for nationalism. In the third section, I discuss main arguments for cosmopolitanism. In the fourth section, I clarify the disputes between nationalism and cosmopolitanism. In the fifth section, I present Confucian cosmopolitanism as a way to interpret Confucian view of global justice. In the sixth section, I clarify tianxia in the narrow and broad senses. In the seventh section, I argue that tianxia can be read as a version of statist cosmopolitanism that insists on the priority of states but pursues global peace and development. In the eighth section, I argue why tianxia is an alternative model of global justice that is neither nationalism nor cosmopolitanism.
In the first section, I introduce the debate between cosmopolitanism and nationalism. In the second section, I present major arguments for nationalism. In the third section, I discuss main arguments for cosmopolitanism. In the fourth section, I clarify the disputes between nationalism and cosmopolitanism. In the fifth section, I present Confucian cosmopolitanism as a way to interpret Confucian view of global justice. In the sixth section, I clarify tianxia in the narrow and broad senses. In the seventh section, I argue that tianxia can be read as a version of statist cosmopolitanism that insists on the priority of states but pursues global peace and development. In the eighth section, I argue why tianxia is an alternative model of global justice that is neither nationalism nor cosmopolitanism.
목차
Abstract
I. Introduction
II. Arguments for Nationalism
III. Arguments for Cosmopolitanism
IV. The Disputes
V. A Confucian Cosmopolitanism
VI. Tianxia (“All Under Heaven”)
VII. Tianxia as a Statist Cosmopolitanism
VIII. Why Tianxia?
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Rethinking Nationalism, Patriotism, and Cosmopolitanism: A Confucian Perspective
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2019 .08
-
5 · 4운동 전후 중국의 세계주의의 확산과 민족주의의 재구성
중국근현대사연구
2019 .09
-
[On This Topic] Varieties of Cosmopolitanism
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2025 .02
-
Human Rights, Pandemic, and Cosmopolitanism: A Christian Cosmopolitanism for the Post-Pandemic Anthropocene
Madang: Journal of Contextual Theology
2021 .06
-
Confucius as a Cosmopolitan: Thought and Practice
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .08
-
[On This Topic] Comparative Perspectives on the Future of Cosmopolitanism
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2024 .08
-
Reconciling Cosmopolitanism with the Ethics of Personal Relationships: Solutions from Historical Confucian Philosophy
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2025 .02
-
세계시민주의의 창으로 재평가한 홍일식의 문화영토론
동서철학연구
2024 .03
-
세계화 시대의 세계시민주의와 종교
종교연구
2022 .04
-
The Cost of Divided Loyalties: Family, Country, and the World as Independent Values
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2025 .02
-
Rereading Frank O’Hara’s “I Do This, I Do That” Poems: Consumption and Modern Urban Life
현대영미시연구
2017 .01
-
기독교 세계시민주의 : 초기 기독교 정치윤리
신학과세계
2017 .12
-
Rethinking Chinese Nationalism in Transnational Contexts
외국학연구
2015 .01
-
Virginia Woolf's modernist narratives and cosmopolitanism focused on Three Guineas and Mrs. Dalloway
영미어문학
2022 .06
-
세계시민주의, 민족주의, 언어- 헤르더(J. G. Herder)와 피히테(J. G. Fichte)
철학∙사상∙문화
2015 .07
-
루만 체계이론의 세계시민주의 담론으로서의 가능성
인문사회과학연구
2016 .01
-
칸트와 멜빌의 코스모폴리타니즘 비교 연구
동서비교문학저널
2023 .09
-
한나 아렌트와 세계시민주의 재고: ‘권리를 가질 권리’ 개념을 중심으로
현대유럽철학연구
2024 .01
-
Confucian Humanitarian Cosmopolitanism and a Global Sense of Place
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2025 .02
-
To be a Citizen in the World of Language: Cosmopolitanism in South Korea
Korea Journal
2020 .12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092468686