메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조민지 (가톨릭대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2025년 봄호(통권 제150호)
발행연도
2025.2
수록면
383 - 420 (38page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2025.02.150.383

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
During the Park Chung-Hee administration, both the professionalism and femininity of nursing workers were important resources mobilized to build the modern healthcare system in South Korea. The femininity of frontline service workers was at the core of its sustainability in times of insufficient resources and systems, like other public sectors in Korean society during the 1960s and 70s. What distinguishes nursing labor from other face-to-face service occupations is, however, that it contains the components of modern knowledge and technology, as well as those of human interactions following the existing social practices. While the former element lowers the status of workers in the gender-discriminatory order, the latter element serves as leverage for maintaining their status and negotiating power in the labor market. The case of licensed nurses, where the two forces dramatically intersect, is an example in which the different elements of femininity and professionalism antagonize over one’s status. The conflict surrounding the status of nurses shows the effects the strategies of related agents surrounding this issue caused. Despite being licensed professionals yet only as employees, nurses shared the vulnerable status of female workers at that time. The discrimination against the female life cycle that nurses had to face was a basis for maintaining the public health policy under the lack of resources. On the other hand, as their expertise acted as a key variable in the health care field, nurses often performed more authority and responsibility in medical practice than their licenses allowed. Even though the government’s health care policy heavily depended on the role of nurses, their poor working conditions naturally caused the chronic shortage of nurses in the public sector. Facing this problem, the South Korean government decided to introduce lower-paying replacement workers, which became exceptionally possible in this case, unlike other professions. Considering that nurses could not open their individual practice, it is not surprising that the value of a nurse’s license was devalued after this phase, which indicates that professional skills or knowledge could be undervalued once they were intertwined with gender roles. Under these circumstances, licensed nurses tried to gain recognition for their independent expertise, yet there was a dilemma: the more they emphasized medical elements in nursing, the stronger the subordinate relationship with doctors became; the more they emphasized non-medical elements, the stronger the existing gender roles inscribed in their care work, which ultimately blurred the distinction from nursing assistants. That is, as far as the care work was fundamentally trivialized, the status of nursing work could not be stable.

목차

서론
1. 여성성과 전문성이라는 공적 자원: 보건소 체계의 구축과 전문화된 돌봄노동
2. 여성성과 전문성이라는 조건: 간호원 면허의 제약
3. 여성성을 활용한 전문성의 단가 낮추기: 대체가능한 비(非)면허 인력
4. 돌봄노동 전문화의 딜레마: 여성성과 전문성을 둘러싼 영역확보 전략과 효과들
결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092457174