지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동국대학교 불교학술원 International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture Vol.33 No.2
- 발행연도
- 2023.12
- 수록면
- 221 - 256 (36page)
- DOI
- 10.16893/IJBTC.2023.06.33.2.221
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
By analysing the glosses on the locative of cause (nimittasattamī or hetu) that appear in the exegetical works of the Mahāvihāra school, a branch of Theravāda Buddhism, this article proposes alternative renderings to existing English translations of some words in the received Theravāda canon (‘Tipiṭaka or Triple basket’).
This study focuses primarily on the exegetical works of the Mahāvihāra school—aṭṭhakathās or commentaries and ṭīkās or subcommentaries—written in Sri Lanka in the first to early second millennium, in tandem with the relevant texts in the canon and their corresponding English translations.
The grammatical analysis of the words and phrases of the canon is one of the hermeneutical strategies of the exegetical works of the Mahāvihāra school. Needless to say, these analyses are crucial to determining more appropriate interpretations of the canon.
Among these grammatical analyses, the glosses on the locative of cause play a vital role. The Mahāvihāra exegetes offer a wealth of analysis on the locative of cause. While the commentaries recognize some cause-locatives in the canon, the subcommentaries also identify some of those not identified in the commentaries. Although the majority of scholars who translated the texts of the canon into English consulted the commentaries, only a handful consulted the subcommentaries. This is apparently one of the reasons why some important explanations about causal locatives in the canon are not taken into account. Although some of the leading scholars saw such analyses in these exegetical works, they did not consider adapting their translations in light of the analyses of causelocatives. They often translated cause-locatives as simple locatives.
This article highlights the importance of translating cause-locatives in the canon as cause-locatives and how these analyses are helpful for the reader to reach a much deeper level of understanding of the teachings in the canon.
This study focuses primarily on the exegetical works of the Mahāvihāra school—aṭṭhakathās or commentaries and ṭīkās or subcommentaries—written in Sri Lanka in the first to early second millennium, in tandem with the relevant texts in the canon and their corresponding English translations.
The grammatical analysis of the words and phrases of the canon is one of the hermeneutical strategies of the exegetical works of the Mahāvihāra school. Needless to say, these analyses are crucial to determining more appropriate interpretations of the canon.
Among these grammatical analyses, the glosses on the locative of cause play a vital role. The Mahāvihāra exegetes offer a wealth of analysis on the locative of cause. While the commentaries recognize some cause-locatives in the canon, the subcommentaries also identify some of those not identified in the commentaries. Although the majority of scholars who translated the texts of the canon into English consulted the commentaries, only a handful consulted the subcommentaries. This is apparently one of the reasons why some important explanations about causal locatives in the canon are not taken into account. Although some of the leading scholars saw such analyses in these exegetical works, they did not consider adapting their translations in light of the analyses of causelocatives. They often translated cause-locatives as simple locatives.
This article highlights the importance of translating cause-locatives in the canon as cause-locatives and how these analyses are helpful for the reader to reach a much deeper level of understanding of the teachings in the canon.
목차
Abstract
Preamble
Locative of Cause
Scholarly Translations
Division of the Monastic Community
Non-returnership
Arahantship
Great wealth, etc.
Dancing, etc.
Elephant-lore, etc.
Abandoning the Defilements
Arisen and Unarisen Pains
Good Conduct
Higher Virtuous Behaviour
Six Sense Bases
Bandage, etc.
Telling Lies
Causing Damage to Plants
Sexual Intercourse
Minute Faults
Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한·중 장소 표현(locative expressions)에서 관찰되는 어휘상(lexical aspect)의 작용에 대한 연구
열린정신 인문학연구
2024 .12
-
영어와 한국어 장소표현 비교 연구
새한영어영문학
2024 .08
-
An Analysis of the Reclassification of English Locative Verbs and the Change Factors in Language Use
영어영문학21
2020 .01
-
16∼19세기한글간찰에서의처격형에대한고찰(Ⅰ) : 출현 빈도 분석을 통한 처격 사용 양상을 중심으로
한글
2018 .06
-
한글간찰과 개화기 교과서의 처격형에 대한 고찰
한글
2019 .06
-
영어의 장소구 도치 구문의 결함적 경동사구 분석
언어과학연구
2021 .03
-
최근 중국 내 중국어 방위사 연구 동향 분석
인문사회과학연구
2024 .08
-
Locative Inversion and Information Coherence
영어학
2016 .06
-
Syntactic Patterns of Dative or Locative Experiencers and Goals
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
한국어 타동성 처소동사 구문에서의 일본인 한국어 학습자와 영어권 한국어 학습자의 격 교체 습득 연구
언어과학연구
2024 .09
-
한 · 중 처소표현(locative expressions)에서 관찰되는 어휘상(lexical aspect) 자질의 역할과 작용에 대한 연구 -한국어 처소격 표지와 중국어 처소구의 통사적 분포 중심으로-
한중인문학포럼 발표논문집
2019 .11
-
방향보어와 장소목적어의 어순 분석 및 지도 방안: ‘V+进+장소목적어+来/去’를 중심으로
언어과학연구
2024 .09
-
A Locative Approach to the Existentiality of the English Progressives
영어학연구
2016 .12
-
Reclassification of Non-alternating Locative Verbs in English
어학연구
2018 .04
-
The Origins of /h/-Final Nouns in Middle Korean
어학연구
2023 .12
-
영어 학습자의 장소 어구 도치(locative inversion) 구문 인식 연구
신영어영문학
2023 .02
-
Korean Dative and Locative Cases: Postposition or Morphological Case Marker
현대문법연구
2015 .01
-
中世․近代國語 副詞格助詞 硏究의 爭點과 課題 - ‘ - 에, - 에서, - 에게’ 對應 形態에 限하여 -
국어사연구
2016 .01
-
An In-situ Approach to Sluicing in Locative Inversion
언어와언어학
2021 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089317915