지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Hangeul movement went through many hardships during the foundation period of Modern Korea, which started from Kapo Reform Movement of 1894. Among them, the Hangeul Dispute in the early 1950s was comparable to the Choson Dynasty's King Yeonsan-gun's suppression of Hangeul, in that it was based on the ruler's arbitrary policy on the language. It had huge influences not only on the Korean society in that period, but also on the policies on the national language and on culture afterwards.
The Hangeul Dispute (Hangeul Simplication Dispute) happened due to the policy on the revision of the spelling of Hangeul between April 1953 and September 1955. President Syngman Rhee's continuous direction about the revision of Hangeul's spelling into simple old forms confronted the government with educational and cultural circles. It was caused by the President's arbitrary policy direction based on his outdated view of Hangeul, which supported familiar old spelling system instead of unfamiliar spelling system of that time, and also by the blind loyalty of Syngman Rhee's supporters such as Paek Doo Jin and Lee Sun Geun.
Right after his coming into the power, Syngman Rhee declared several times that Hangeul's spelling system should go back to the 1910s' style, which were used in the translation of the Bible. Following the President's declarations, the Ministry of Culture and Education made a proposal for the simplification of Hangeul public in June 1954. However, the whole nation opposed it, as it was not democratic, scientific, rational nor efficient. The opposition eventually led to political and cultural upheaval in the spring and summer of 1954, though in the beginning it was only a controversy over the revision of Hangeul's spelling system. After all, the Syngman Rhee government had to give up their intention, facing the national resistance against it.
The Hangeul Dispute has several implications like the followings. First, from the linguistic history's perspective, it was a controversy whether to choose ideographic symbol system or phonetic one. The former was based on the morphology while the latter encouraged simplified spelling system. Second, though the Hangeul Dispute was only about the spelling system in the beginning, it expanded to cultural and political debates, as its advocator and dissenter groups had different philosophical backgrounds and socioeconomic interests. Third, it seems that the dissenters criticized Syngman Rhee's policy on Hangeul, but in the heart of it they strongly criticized his dictatorship. Fourth, the Hangeul Dispute tried to succeed the legitimacy of Choson Language Society(朝鮮語學會), which led anti-Japanese movement during the Japanese colonial period. Lastly, it seems that the ultimate intention of Syngman Rhee's Hangeul simplification policy was to nurture loyal people who would support his imperial republicanism.
In sum, the Hangeul Controversy was a failed attempt as the people opposed the authoritarian regime's compulsive policy on language and culture, Also, it was a collision of Syngman Rhee's personal preference for phonetic spelling system with anti Syngman Rhee intellectual group's support for the Choson Language Society's spelling system. Considering the facts that there still exist some scholars who insist the superiority of the phonetic spelling system and that many teenagers are contaminated with cyber language that ignores ideographic rules, it seems possible that another Hangeul Controversy might happen again.
The Hangeul Dispute (Hangeul Simplication Dispute) happened due to the policy on the revision of the spelling of Hangeul between April 1953 and September 1955. President Syngman Rhee's continuous direction about the revision of Hangeul's spelling into simple old forms confronted the government with educational and cultural circles. It was caused by the President's arbitrary policy direction based on his outdated view of Hangeul, which supported familiar old spelling system instead of unfamiliar spelling system of that time, and also by the blind loyalty of Syngman Rhee's supporters such as Paek Doo Jin and Lee Sun Geun.
Right after his coming into the power, Syngman Rhee declared several times that Hangeul's spelling system should go back to the 1910s' style, which were used in the translation of the Bible. Following the President's declarations, the Ministry of Culture and Education made a proposal for the simplification of Hangeul public in June 1954. However, the whole nation opposed it, as it was not democratic, scientific, rational nor efficient. The opposition eventually led to political and cultural upheaval in the spring and summer of 1954, though in the beginning it was only a controversy over the revision of Hangeul's spelling system. After all, the Syngman Rhee government had to give up their intention, facing the national resistance against it.
The Hangeul Dispute has several implications like the followings. First, from the linguistic history's perspective, it was a controversy whether to choose ideographic symbol system or phonetic one. The former was based on the morphology while the latter encouraged simplified spelling system. Second, though the Hangeul Dispute was only about the spelling system in the beginning, it expanded to cultural and political debates, as its advocator and dissenter groups had different philosophical backgrounds and socioeconomic interests. Third, it seems that the dissenters criticized Syngman Rhee's policy on Hangeul, but in the heart of it they strongly criticized his dictatorship. Fourth, the Hangeul Dispute tried to succeed the legitimacy of Choson Language Society(朝鮮語學會), which led anti-Japanese movement during the Japanese colonial period. Lastly, it seems that the ultimate intention of Syngman Rhee's Hangeul simplification policy was to nurture loyal people who would support his imperial republicanism.
In sum, the Hangeul Controversy was a failed attempt as the people opposed the authoritarian regime's compulsive policy on language and culture, Also, it was a collision of Syngman Rhee's personal preference for phonetic spelling system with anti Syngman Rhee intellectual group's support for the Choson Language Society's spelling system. Considering the facts that there still exist some scholars who insist the superiority of the phonetic spelling system and that many teenagers are contaminated with cyber language that ignores ideographic rules, it seems possible that another Hangeul Controversy might happen again.
목차
머리말
1. 대한제국기~건국기 이승만의 한글운동
2. 이승만의 한글간소화 지시와 한글파동의 발단
3. 「한글간소화안」과 한글파동의 확산
4. 한글파동의 격화 및 정치쟁점화
맺음말: 한글파동의 정치·문화적 성격
영문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
英祖 御製書의 頒布 대상과 간행 방식
한국사연구
2018 .09
-
한글학의 특성과 내용 구성 원리
한국어학
2014 .08
-
한글보급과 민족형성의 양상
어문연구
2006 .01
-
한글 문화의 발전과 세계화
한국어학
2008 .11
-
[Invented in 1446] Basic Structure of Hangeul
Korea Journal
1963 .07
-
해방 후 한글운동에서의 이극로의 위상
동양학
2009 .01
-
한글 음절표 의미와 교육용 유형 설정
한국어학
2009 .08
-
세종의 문자 정책과 한글 진흥 정책의 미래
국어문학
2010 .08
-
한글 융합교육 ‘교수-학습’안에 대한 연구
한글
2018 .06
-
한글 노래의 변천사
국어교육연구
2011 .08
-
‘한글’에 대한 사회적 관심의 트렌드 : 신문 빅 데이터를 활용하여
한글
2017 .06
-
세계의 다양한 문자 속에서 한글을 바라보기
어문론총
2019 .01
-
개화기 광고문의 문체
어문론집
2010 .03
-
방언에 대한 조선어학회 학자들의 관심과 연구 성과
한글
2017 .06
-
Syngman Rhee: A New Horizon of Research on Modern History of Korea
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2006 .06
-
한글날의 발전사
한글
2006 .09
-
한글전용 위헌소원 변론질문 검토소견
漢字漢文敎育
2016 .01
-
쓰기능력에 따른 철자학습의 효과
영어교과교육
2014 .01
-
Syngman Rhee’s Vision and Reality : The Establishment of the Nation and Thereafter
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2011 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0