지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.4
- 수록면
- 91 - 108 (18page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The concept of human rights has been formed and extended in the process ofcoping with violence throughout its history. Sorel discerned violence from power.According to him, the state order accompanying authority and obedience tookplace on the side of power, and the emancipation from bondage took place on theside of violence. By defining the increasing trends of the proletariat revolution, heput a high moral value on socialist violence in that it may save the world inmodern times.
Arendt contended that the critical distinction between power and violence lies in that violence is completely under the control of number while power is not subject to change due to the number to a certain extent. He argued that power requires a lot of supporters but that violence plays a role as an instrument of itself. Violence can be justified only through the intention as it is a means to an end. However, power can grow naturally when people join hands to take action, thereby it attains justice in itself.
Benjamin paid attention to ethical matters to explain the instrument of violence with respect to them. Violence can be ratified only when it is concerned with ethical matters. It is only an instrument to accomplish the goals on the one hand, and the legal orders should be the essential, fundamental aim, as well as an instrument, on the other hand. It can be meaningless to identify the concepts of violence and human rights considering that the issue was an outcome of an era when people envisioned a state of utopian socialism through the proletariatre volution and brought focus not into the physical violence in the real world but into the metaphysical violence.
Although these three controversialists in the twentieth century had distinctive perspectives in the discourse on violence, they held a common standpoint in that they all denied violence on the st
reets.
Arendt contended that the critical distinction between power and violence lies in that violence is completely under the control of number while power is not subject to change due to the number to a certain extent. He argued that power requires a lot of supporters but that violence plays a role as an instrument of itself. Violence can be justified only through the intention as it is a means to an end. However, power can grow naturally when people join hands to take action, thereby it attains justice in itself.
Benjamin paid attention to ethical matters to explain the instrument of violence with respect to them. Violence can be ratified only when it is concerned with ethical matters. It is only an instrument to accomplish the goals on the one hand, and the legal orders should be the essential, fundamental aim, as well as an instrument, on the other hand. It can be meaningless to identify the concepts of violence and human rights considering that the issue was an outcome of an era when people envisioned a state of utopian socialism through the proletariatre volution and brought focus not into the physical violence in the real world but into the metaphysical violence.
Although these three controversialists in the twentieth century had distinctive perspectives in the discourse on violence, they held a common standpoint in that they all denied violence on the st
reets.
목차
참 고 문 헌
참고문헌 (7)
참고문헌 신청
Arendt , 1970 , Macht und Gewalt
Barth , 1956 , Masse und Mythos
Martin u , 1970 , Ästhetik und Gewalt
Kurt , 1974 , Andeutungen zu einer Geschichte des Redens über die Gewalt Gewaltverhältnisse und die Ohnmacht der Kritik
Villa, Dana Richard , 2000 , Arendt und Heidegger :The Fate of the political :아렌트와 하이데거
Barth , 1956 , Masse und Mythos
Martin u , 1970 , Ästhetik und Gewalt
Kurt , 1974 , Andeutungen zu einer Geschichte des Redens über die Gewalt Gewaltverhältnisse und die Ohnmacht der Kritik
Villa, Dana Richard , 2000 , Arendt und Heidegger :The Fate of the political :아렌트와 하이데거
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
학교폭력 예방을 위한 경기도의 역할
정책연구
2017 .08
-
사무직 근로자의 직장폭력피해경험 연구– ‘폭력풍토(Violence Climate)’를 중심으로 -
한국공안행정학회보
2018 .01
-
가정폭력노출경험과 청소년의 부모폭력에 대한 연구 : 공격성의 매개효과를 중심으로
한국아동복지학
2007 .06
-
부모 간 폭력에 노출된 경험이대학생의 데이트폭력 가해에 미치는 영향: 젠더감수성의 조절효과
지역과 세계
2019 .01
-
청소년과 폭력성 멀티미디어에 대한 일고찰
한국사회과학연구
2001 .06
-
학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률의 문제점과 개선방안
원광법학
2016 .01
-
학교폭력에 대한 경찰의 법·제도적 대응방안 고찰
法學論文集
2012 .01
-
家庭暴力의 實態와 법적 고찰
법학논집
2001 .01
-
대구지역 데이트폭력의 실태 및 요인 분석
치안정책연구
2018 .01
-
가정의 신체적 폭력과 아동복지
한국아동복지학회 학술발표논문집
1997 .12
-
가정폭력과 학교폭력 피해경험이 아동의 비행에 미치는 영향: 자아존중감의 조절효과
한국공안행정학회보
2019 .01
-
학교폭력 예방 및 대책에 관한 법률의 문제점과 개선방안
아주법학
2012 .01
-
한일 양국 초등학생 학교폭력 실태 비교연구
일본근대학연구
2017 .01
-
학교폭력의 원인 및 대처방안에 관한 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2002 .12
-
일본의 데이트 폭력 문제와 예방에 관한 검토
법과 정책연구
2017 .01
-
여성복지서비스법제(여성폭력)의 타당성과 효율성
원광법학
2006 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-340-014080606