지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to study the influence of the result of the Iraqi War on South Korea's policy for the North Korean Nuclear Issue, and especially the change in policy direction since the end of the war.
The Rho Moo-hyun government's policy towards nuclear issues in North Korea can be represented by "three principles relating to the North Korean nuclear issue." These are: opposition to any nuclear weapons development programmes by North Korea, peaceful resolution of the issue through dialogue; and an active role for South Korea in the process of peaceful resolution.
Before the Iraqi War, in complaining about the measures against North Korea being imposed by the US, President Rho Moo-hyun particularly emphasized the principle of peaceful resolution, even saying that "the dialogue with North Korea must be continued at any case." The South Korean government also tried to mediate between the US and North Korea. Overall, the Rho government prefer cooperation with North Korea to cooperating with the US.
The "Baghdad effect" caused by the early cessation of the Iraqi War, however, changed Seoul's attitude towards the North Korean nuclear issue. First, in entering into three-party talks among the US, China and North Korea to discuss the nuclear issue, the Rho Moo-hyun government virtually discarded its principle of playing a leading role. Secondly, President Rho retreated from his original position of pursuing peaceful resolution when at the Washington Summit he agreed with President Bush to consider "further steps" if necessary .
By and large, it can be said that after the end of the Iraqi War the Rho Moo-hyun government became more realistic, and began to put more emphasis on the cooperation with US in resolving the nuclear issue. But there still remains policy gap between Washington and Seoul as a result of President Rho's personally held view which is relatively critical of the US, and because of his internal political calculation.
The Rho Moo-hyun government's policy towards nuclear issues in North Korea can be represented by "three principles relating to the North Korean nuclear issue." These are: opposition to any nuclear weapons development programmes by North Korea, peaceful resolution of the issue through dialogue; and an active role for South Korea in the process of peaceful resolution.
Before the Iraqi War, in complaining about the measures against North Korea being imposed by the US, President Rho Moo-hyun particularly emphasized the principle of peaceful resolution, even saying that "the dialogue with North Korea must be continued at any case." The South Korean government also tried to mediate between the US and North Korea. Overall, the Rho government prefer cooperation with North Korea to cooperating with the US.
The "Baghdad effect" caused by the early cessation of the Iraqi War, however, changed Seoul's attitude towards the North Korean nuclear issue. First, in entering into three-party talks among the US, China and North Korea to discuss the nuclear issue, the Rho Moo-hyun government virtually discarded its principle of playing a leading role. Secondly, President Rho retreated from his original position of pursuing peaceful resolution when at the Washington Summit he agreed with President Bush to consider "further steps" if necessary .
By and large, it can be said that after the end of the Iraqi War the Rho Moo-hyun government became more realistic, and began to put more emphasis on the cooperation with US in resolving the nuclear issue. But there still remains policy gap between Washington and Seoul as a result of President Rho's personally held view which is relatively critical of the US, and because of his internal political calculation.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 북핵 문제에 대한 정책기조
3. 이라크전 이후 노무현 정부의 북핵 정책 변화
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
제4차 6자회담의 의미와 한국의 정책방향
국제관계연구
2005 .09
-
북핵문제와 한국의 대응 : 북핵 확산을 중심으로
국제정치연구
2016 .06
-
제2차 북핵위기 전개과정과 노무현대통령의 리더십
아세아연구
2013 .09
-
Toward a Governance System and Political Understanding to Permit a Verified Nuclear-free Korean Peninsula: Policy Developments and Operational Challenges
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2014 .01
-
中朝关系与中国的朝核政策
국제지역학논총
2009 .12
-
Nuclear-Armed North Korea and South Korea’s Strategic Countermeasures
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2004 .01
-
북핵문제와 한반도 통일
한반도선진화재단 기타 단행본
2012 .03
-
제2의 북한 핵 위기: 합의냐 파국이냐
국제관계연구
2003 .09
-
Comparative Study on the Korean University Students’ North Korean Policy and Perception: With Primary Focus on the Periods of Lee Myung Bak and Roh Moo Hyun Regimes
세계지역연구논총
2009 .01
-
무정의 정치노선 연구
통일정책연구
2015 .01
-
North Korea’s Nuclear and Missile Threat: Recalibration of Policy Measures
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
북한 핵무기 무력화를 위한 한국의 군사적 대응방향
한반도선진화재단 기타 단행본
2012 .03
-
North Korea’s South Korea Policy: An Evaluation of Determining Variables and Prospects for 2012
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2011 .01
-
Coexistence of North Korea’s Nuclear Development and Economic Sanctions: The Dilemma of Policy Value Difference
Journal of Peace and Unification
2019 .01
-
An Enduring Dilemma on the Korean Peninsula: The North Korean Nuclear Conundrum and South Korea’s Strategic Choices
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-014135353