메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 어문학 통권 제86호
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
389 - 416 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In the early stage of 1910's a Korean new school play was taken form like the one of Japanese as the pre-model. Nevertheless the spectators had good experiences to watch the western play through the new school play, and their thoughts of the play were changed. Those who experienced the new school play had the general idea of the play script in the western play. Also the conception of the player was resulted in the change. It was shaped that the modern conception of the player - the player's role was that the player expressed an imaginary character of the drama into the one in a reality through the drama based on a text of a play. This variation in the conception of the player brought on the reduction of the phase of the classical player. The classical players were recognized that they showed only their skill.
They groped various ways to get over this crisis. These were charity performances, new school plays, and joint stages by new school players and classical players. They succeeded to improve their images more or less playing charity performances. But the classical players learned the new school play in a short time and putting the play on the stage was beyond their abilities. Even the classical players from kisaeng's house tried to look for new ways taking a Korean classical opera, they were looked away eventually from onlookers.
In spite of their effort they were pushed out. This was why proprietors ran indoor playhouses and they fixed up the plays for spectators' fondness. Those who already watched new school plays having plots didn't recognize the classical plays as plays any more. Those were only broken pieces. The classical players were strongly conscious that they were not players any more but showed onlookers their skill more and more. Therefore the classical players and new school players came to a rupture deeply.
The Actors within a classical play were described as very creative and independent. Their characterizations of the author's creations exhibited a much more coherent sense of autonomy and flow than what the author strictly wrote. In contemporary plays, however, the characters are formed not only by the actors' interpretations, but they are also strongly influenced by the director's planning and producing. In other words, a contemporary production's success is dependent not only on the independent performances of each actor, but also on mutual cooperation. The acting of a play is an active factor in constructing a play. Audience members who are familiar with new-school plays are able to recognize the difference between new-school and classical plays.

목차

1. 서론

2. 신파극과 근대적 배우의 등장

3. 고전극 배우들의 위기와 방향모색

4. 근대적 배우 개념의 형성

5. 결론

참고문헌

저자소개

[Abstract]

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-014424483