지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Kim Ok-kyun is one of the leading revolutionaries in Kapsin Cheongbyeon, the Coup d'Eta in 1884. In spite of rhe gigantic amount of historical documents about him and of his importance as a political leader, he has been at once overlooked by historians and thus consequently brought broad ranges of interpretation from the father of pro-Japanese group to a quintessential patriot. In memory of its 120years of anniversary since the breakup of the Kapsin Cheongbyeon, this paper intends to provide a new interpretation about him and his contemporanes including the viewpoint of Korean Provisional Government.
The historical evaluation about him is too diverse to pinpoint in simple statements. Among his contemporaries, Kim Hong-jip, Kim Yun-sik, and Eu Yun-jung criticised him and the Kapsin Cheongbyeon as a treacherous subject and a treacherous movement respectively. On the other hand, his friendly companies such as Yun Chi-ho and Yu Kil-Chun were ambivalent, pardy supporting him as a real patriot in terms of his personality and partly denouncing the Kapsin Cheong bye on's radicalness. A few Korean Provisional Government officials like Park Eun-sik underevaluated Kapsin Cheongbyeon at first, bur highly praised him as a positive tevolutionary or a founding father of the Independence Party later.
According to Hanil Kwankei Saryojip, a historical document about the relationship between Korea and Japan, he possesses both aspects of a real innovator to improve Korean political system and of a pro-Japanese politician who broke up the Kapsin Cheongbyeon with the instigation of Japanese government, which gradually accelerated the clash between China and Japan. Another interpretation by Sohn Jeong-do said that his political revolution was an effort to replace a corrupted Korean government with a new fresh one, but only to fail because of foreign countries' intervention and domestic politicians' non-cooperation.
A political scholar like Cho So-ang insisted that Kim Ok-kyun conttibuted to founding the Korean Independence Party, whose energy was drawn from the Kapsin Cheongbyeon, furthermore justifying the violence applied in the movement. Moreover, in his memorial speech of the 60th anniversary of the Kapsin Cheongbyeon in 1944, Cho expressed even the regret that the Kapsin Cheongbyeon could have prevented the Japanese annexation of Korea once the political revolution had succeeded. He also maintained that next generations of Koreans succeed the spirit of the Kapsin Cheongbyeon and apply it in recovering the independence of colonized Korea from Japan. Tokrip Kongron, a book dealing with Korean independence, also supports the positive role of Kim Ok-kyun. It argues that Kim is the only national hero among modern revolutionaries, and that his political uprising represents the genuine essence of renovations for the last six hundred years of Chosun dynasty.
To make a long story short, a historical approach about Kim needs new and multiple investigation. Especially the negative studies by small groups of politicians are asked to review in more attentive and careful steps.
The historical evaluation about him is too diverse to pinpoint in simple statements. Among his contemporaries, Kim Hong-jip, Kim Yun-sik, and Eu Yun-jung criticised him and the Kapsin Cheongbyeon as a treacherous subject and a treacherous movement respectively. On the other hand, his friendly companies such as Yun Chi-ho and Yu Kil-Chun were ambivalent, pardy supporting him as a real patriot in terms of his personality and partly denouncing the Kapsin Cheong bye on's radicalness. A few Korean Provisional Government officials like Park Eun-sik underevaluated Kapsin Cheongbyeon at first, bur highly praised him as a positive tevolutionary or a founding father of the Independence Party later.
According to Hanil Kwankei Saryojip, a historical document about the relationship between Korea and Japan, he possesses both aspects of a real innovator to improve Korean political system and of a pro-Japanese politician who broke up the Kapsin Cheongbyeon with the instigation of Japanese government, which gradually accelerated the clash between China and Japan. Another interpretation by Sohn Jeong-do said that his political revolution was an effort to replace a corrupted Korean government with a new fresh one, but only to fail because of foreign countries' intervention and domestic politicians' non-cooperation.
A political scholar like Cho So-ang insisted that Kim Ok-kyun conttibuted to founding the Korean Independence Party, whose energy was drawn from the Kapsin Cheongbyeon, furthermore justifying the violence applied in the movement. Moreover, in his memorial speech of the 60th anniversary of the Kapsin Cheongbyeon in 1944, Cho expressed even the regret that the Kapsin Cheongbyeon could have prevented the Japanese annexation of Korea once the political revolution had succeeded. He also maintained that next generations of Koreans succeed the spirit of the Kapsin Cheongbyeon and apply it in recovering the independence of colonized Korea from Japan. Tokrip Kongron, a book dealing with Korean independence, also supports the positive role of Kim Ok-kyun. It argues that Kim is the only national hero among modern revolutionaries, and that his political uprising represents the genuine essence of renovations for the last six hundred years of Chosun dynasty.
To make a long story short, a historical approach about Kim needs new and multiple investigation. Especially the negative studies by small groups of politicians are asked to review in more attentive and careful steps.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 동시대 인물들의 김옥균 인식
Ⅲ. 일제강점기 임정 인사들의 김옥균 평가
Ⅳ. 김옥균의 현재적 의미
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Kapsin Political Upheaval
Korea Journal
1966 .05
-
망명자 김옥균(金玉均)에 대한 일본의 처우와 조선정책(1884~1890)
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
『吳淸卿獻策論』을 통해 본 淸政府의 對朝鮮 干涉政策
장서각
2000 .12
-
日帝 强占期 金玉均 推仰과 偉人敎育
역사교육
2000 .06
-
갑신정변 참여층의 신분과 정변 참여동기
International Journal of Korean History
2000 .12
-
Kim Ok-kyun and the Reform Movement of the Progressives
Korea Journal
1984 .12
-
Two Poems by Kim Kwang-kyun
Korea Journal
1966 .01
-
列强의 對韓政策에 대한 一硏究 : 壬午軍亂과 甲申政變을 中心으로
역사학보
1981 .12
-
갑신정변과 궁중 내부 세력의 내응과 반발 : 특히 내시 유재현을 중심으로
동학연구
2009 .03
-
일제 말기 역사극에 나타난 ‘친일’의 이중성 : 박영호의 〈金玉均의 死〉를 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
2008 .08
-
윤치호의 문명개화의식과 반청자주의식
한국독립운동사연구
2004 .12
-
보성전문학교에서 김일성종합대학으로 : 식민지 지식인 김광진의 생애와 경제사 연구
역사학보
2016 .12
-
김남주 시의 탈식민주의적 연구
비평문학
2005 .05
-
일본망명자 김옥균 송환을 둘러싼 조일 양국의 대응
대동문화연구
2014 .01
-
海山 金正黙의 중국 關內에서의 민족운동
대구사학
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014446825