지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper intends to analyze the campaign for respecting Kim, Ok-kyun(金玉均) and the historical figures teaching during the Japanese colonial rule period. These activities show the perfect type of the historical figure whom leaders in modern Korean society, especially intellectuals involved in educational policy making, regarded as 'the great man' at that time.
The main bodies of these activities are the moderate nationalists who intended to realize the independence under the name of power establishment movement and Asianists who contended that Japan, Korea and China unite under the hegemony of the Japanese Empire reign. The former justified the westernization and the power establishment movement by regarding Kim, Ok-kyun as the pioneer of modernization, the latter beatified the invasion and rule of Japanese imperialists by regarding him as the hero who had made a martyr of oneself to maintain peace of East Asia. And they published the most of newspapers, magazines, novels and biographies to accomplish these objects. But this campaign was based on the heroism and elitism. As a result, some of people began considering Kim, Ok-kyun a pioneer, not a traitor. Furthermore, by making the Korean people consider him one of main Asianists, Japanese imperialists intended to set them on a war footing.
After the Liberation, as the westernization was still the supreme goal in our society, Kim, Ok-kyun also was regarded as the great pioneer and patriot, not the pro-Japanese. Nowadays the understanding of Kim, Ok-kyun is based on the veneration of the moderate nationalists.
But my point is not whether Kim, Ok-kyun is pro-Japanese or patriot, but relation between his life and our modern times. Namely, when we write the biography of a great mind or explain the life of a great man as history education scholars and history teachers, we need reconsider several factors that have obstructed our understanding of historical figures. Therefore, we need grade character on the historical conditions and the moral standards, not on the sectarian prejudice. Also we need participate in popular education and work out a teaching method when we consider the biographies of a great mind the desirable books for the mass.
The main bodies of these activities are the moderate nationalists who intended to realize the independence under the name of power establishment movement and Asianists who contended that Japan, Korea and China unite under the hegemony of the Japanese Empire reign. The former justified the westernization and the power establishment movement by regarding Kim, Ok-kyun as the pioneer of modernization, the latter beatified the invasion and rule of Japanese imperialists by regarding him as the hero who had made a martyr of oneself to maintain peace of East Asia. And they published the most of newspapers, magazines, novels and biographies to accomplish these objects. But this campaign was based on the heroism and elitism. As a result, some of people began considering Kim, Ok-kyun a pioneer, not a traitor. Furthermore, by making the Korean people consider him one of main Asianists, Japanese imperialists intended to set them on a war footing.
After the Liberation, as the westernization was still the supreme goal in our society, Kim, Ok-kyun also was regarded as the great pioneer and patriot, not the pro-Japanese. Nowadays the understanding of Kim, Ok-kyun is based on the veneration of the moderate nationalists.
But my point is not whether Kim, Ok-kyun is pro-Japanese or patriot, but relation between his life and our modern times. Namely, when we write the biography of a great mind or explain the life of a great man as history education scholars and history teachers, we need reconsider several factors that have obstructed our understanding of historical figures. Therefore, we need grade character on the historical conditions and the moral standards, not on the sectarian prejudice. Also we need participate in popular education and work out a teaching method when we consider the biographies of a great mind the desirable books for the mass.
목차
1. 序言
2. 金玉均 在認識과 偉人敎育
3. 金玉均 思想 唱導運動과 大東亞共榮圈論
4. 結語
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Kim Ok-kyun and the Reform Movement of the Progressives
Korea Journal
1984 .12
-
Two Poems by Kim Kwang-kyun
Korea Journal
1966 .01
-
金玉均의 正體改革論
경주사학
1995 .12
-
망명자 김옥균(金玉均)에 대한 일본의 처우와 조선정책(1884~1890)
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
Early Modern Thinker : Ho Kyun
Korea Journal
1970 .02
-
金玉均과 中國 : 對中國認識의 時期的 變化를 中心으로
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .09
-
조선의 對日사절 파견과 대응양상의 변화(1876~1885) -흠차대신 파견을 중심으로-
한국사학보
2019 .11
-
1940년대 초 김광균의 비평적 시선과 서정시 : ‘서정’ 불능의 조건에서 서정시 쓰기
국어문학
2017 .11
-
Cho Sung-kyun’s Exhibition
Korea Journal
1970 .04
-
Hŏ Kyun
Korea Journal
1971 .10
-
김광균 시의 전향과 그 의식변이 연구
어문연구
2010 .01
-
일제 말기 역사극에 나타난 ‘친일’의 이중성 : 박영호의 〈金玉均의 死〉를 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
2008 .08
-
김광균의 시론과 지평융합적 시의식
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
김광균 시의 자연과 모더니티
한국시학연구
2001 .10
-
安堅의 <夢遊桃源圖>에 대한 연구
온지논총
2006 .01
-
The Characteristics of the System of Japanese Imperialist Rule in Korea from 1905 to 1945
Korea Journal
1996 .03
-
해방공간의 출판계와 위인전
역사연구
2016 .06
-
한국 역사 교과서인가, 아니면 일본 역사 교과서인가? : 교학사 한국사 교과서 일제강점기 서술 비판
역사비평
2013 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015490004