지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There were two features shown in the generation debates of Korean colonial age: First, debates began with the criticism for the new writers from the established writers, whereas it usually had begun with the criticism for the established from the new. Debates between two generations could be defined as the struggle of their positions against the established who already held the literary hegemony. But those debates were not the same with the former days. Second, the struggling aspects between two generation were shown as the confrontation between critics and novelists. It was connected with the situations of the mid-1930s when the literary world at that time faced with: the absolute basis on the critical writing was lost when main thought which had led that age fallen apart, therefore the forefront aspect of criticism was bitterly shaken.
Those two features on the generation debates are related with changes of literary systems which were shown at early-mid-1930s. New writers took the platform from literary contests in spring by the journalism, and journalism made literary pages from publishing the sister-magazines, and they(journalism) advertised their new writers for the public who were chosen by them. Results of that changes showed as the new-trend writers whose characters are precise and as their exclusive belonging for the journalism. The established writers, as a matter of fact, whose activity were arranged with the club magazine and with taking the new writers, were very critical on those trends. The argument on the abusive making of the new writers and on the cleaning up the literary world showed the extensive effect of journalism and the stand of the established for the new writers.
Lee, Tae-joon defended the position of new writers before the genuine debate began in 1939. He was the head of literary attainments department in Chosun-JoongAngilbo, and his 9-person-group had a strong lineup from the 4 major journalism. The group was established from the influence of 13-person-group in Japanese literary world, but their way of intervening the literary world was decisively different: 9-group give no answer to the literary marxist camp, whereas 13-group confronted with them. Though they acted and grasped the material basis such as journalism or magazine, they didn’t suggest the logical completeness or factional intention, therefore the definite logical point on that position were ambiguously mixed. New writers of that age could take their own position during those ambiguous moment, and in 1939 they could step forward for the front debate.
Kim, Dong-Ree acted as the representative controversialist for the new writers. His ‘A Snowy Heron’ was chosen as a second winner of the 1934-Spring literary contest of Chosun-ilbo, in 1935 contest of Chosun-JoongAng-ilbo ‘Descendants of Hwarang’ won a prize, and he won another prize from Chosun-ilbo by his work ‘Mountain Fire’. Kim was the symbolic existence among those new writers at that age. We could catch the decent influence of Lee, Tae-joon from Kim, Dong-Ree’s works. It could be demonstrated by some facts as follows: Kim began to recognize on the novels from the meeting with Lee; Kim began his literary career from the ‘Descendents of Hwarang’ which was influenced by Lee’s works ; he took the main platform in Sentences (Moon-jang) and broke up his pencil after ceasing publish of that magazine. That was the argument still going on.
Those two features on the generation debates are related with changes of literary systems which were shown at early-mid-1930s. New writers took the platform from literary contests in spring by the journalism, and journalism made literary pages from publishing the sister-magazines, and they(journalism) advertised their new writers for the public who were chosen by them. Results of that changes showed as the new-trend writers whose characters are precise and as their exclusive belonging for the journalism. The established writers, as a matter of fact, whose activity were arranged with the club magazine and with taking the new writers, were very critical on those trends. The argument on the abusive making of the new writers and on the cleaning up the literary world showed the extensive effect of journalism and the stand of the established for the new writers.
Lee, Tae-joon defended the position of new writers before the genuine debate began in 1939. He was the head of literary attainments department in Chosun-JoongAngilbo, and his 9-person-group had a strong lineup from the 4 major journalism. The group was established from the influence of 13-person-group in Japanese literary world, but their way of intervening the literary world was decisively different: 9-group give no answer to the literary marxist camp, whereas 13-group confronted with them. Though they acted and grasped the material basis such as journalism or magazine, they didn’t suggest the logical completeness or factional intention, therefore the definite logical point on that position were ambiguously mixed. New writers of that age could take their own position during those ambiguous moment, and in 1939 they could step forward for the front debate.
Kim, Dong-Ree acted as the representative controversialist for the new writers. His ‘A Snowy Heron’ was chosen as a second winner of the 1934-Spring literary contest of Chosun-ilbo, in 1935 contest of Chosun-JoongAng-ilbo ‘Descendants of Hwarang’ won a prize, and he won another prize from Chosun-ilbo by his work ‘Mountain Fire’. Kim was the symbolic existence among those new writers at that age. We could catch the decent influence of Lee, Tae-joon from Kim, Dong-Ree’s works. It could be demonstrated by some facts as follows: Kim began to recognize on the novels from the meeting with Lee; Kim began his literary career from the ‘Descendents of Hwarang’ which was influenced by Lee’s works ; he took the main platform in Sentences (Moon-jang) and broke up his pencil after ceasing publish of that magazine. That was the argument still going on.
목차
Ⅰ. 세대논쟁의 두 가지 특징
Ⅱ. 저널리즘의 영향력 확대와 신인남조론(新人濫造論)
Ⅲ. 구인회의 존립 방식과 좌장 이태준의 논리 수준
Ⅳ. ≪文章≫의 폐간과 김동리의 절필
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
An L2 Writer's Development Over Time
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2011 .10
-
1935年 張赫宙の思想的転換点
일본문화학보
2002 .11
-
1930년대 신문 학예면과 문인기자 집단
한국현대문학연구
2002 .12
-
사회제도 속의 문학생태계와 문학교육의 과제
문학교육학
2013 .01
-
Literary Magazines in the Past
Korea Journal
1962 .08
-
박경리 작품에 나타난 죽음과 생명의 관계
현대소설연구
2002 .12
-
현대시 교육과 4‧19혁명
문학교육학
2010 .01
-
디지털 시대와 문학 산업
신영어영문학
2001 .08
-
설창수론 : ‘전인(全人)’의 문학과 의지의 언어
우리문학연구
2016 .07
-
1950년대 전향자－문인의 자기서사 재구성 양상: 김기진, 백철의 문단회고를 중심으로
현대문학의 연구
2018 .01
-
근대 부산·경남 지역의 매체 현황과 지역문학의 양상
국어문학
2017 .03
-
1930년대 작가적 자기 인식과 그 문학적 생산력에 관한 고찰
한국현대문학연구
1999 .12
-
[논문] 식민지 제국과 예술가의 자존 방식 - 1930년대 후반기의 이태준 문학
한국근대문학연구
2000 .04
-
The Writer and the Reader
Korea Journal
1969 .04
-
History of Literary Criticism in Korea
Korea Journal
1973 .07
-
Some Characteristics of Chinese Literary Criticism
동아문화
1981 .08
-
김동인의 『감자(Potatoes)』 영역본 분석: 문체 번역을 중심으로
통역과 번역
2010 .01
-
한국 잡지 게재 문학의 문화사적 성격 연구
어문학
2005 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-017687333