지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There is an essential problem in the existing frame of ancient Korean history. According to the frame, following Dangun Joseon, ancient Korean nation was ruled consecutively by King Jun, a descendent of Chinese Jizi, and Wi Man, a refugee from China. After the collapse of Wi Man Joseon, the Han empire established the four Han commanderies, Lelang, Lintun, Zhenfan and Xuantu, in the region. This means that the Chinese empire occupied the northern half of the Korean peninsula and Manchuria. There were many other later polities such as Buyeo, Goguryeo, Eupru, Eastern Okjeo, Dongye, Han (Three Han) in the regions. Among them, Goguryeo is said to have been established inXuantu commandery.
If this frame is correct, the ancient Korean nation must have been ruled by China for long times. Because Goguryeo was established in Xuantu commandery under Chinese administration, it is possible to argue that Guguryeo was a successor for Chinese history.
However, ancient Chinese and Korean texts indicate that the existing frame of ancient Korean history is wrong. The King Jun's regime (the Jizi state) and Wi Man Joseon as well as the four Han commanderies were not major parts of ancient Korean history.
As clearly documented in the texts, occupying the entire Manchuria and the Korean peninsula, the western border of Dangun Joseon was the Luan River near Beijing. The western part of Dangun Joseon got through changes, with the establishment of the Jizi state in the Luan River valley and the following usurpation of Wi Man and his expansion to the Daling River valley. The Western Han conquered Wi Man Joseon and established the four Han commanderies in the region between the Luan River the Liao River. Thus, the Liao River became the western border of Dangun Joseon.
Accordingly, the consecutive establishments of the Jizi state, Wi Man Joseon, and the four Han commanderies were nothing but political transitions happened in the western borderland of Dangun Joseon. Despite the changes in its western borderland, Dangun Joseon was still developing, occupying Manchuria to the east of the Liao River and the Korean peninsula. Goguryeo, one of the feudal states (geosukook渠帥國) of the Dangun Joseon, took advantage of the decline in the Joseon's central control to develop into an independent power. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that Goguryeo was one of the Korean nations succeeding Dangun Joseon.
Nevertheless, the Korean historical society still systemizes that the regime of King Jun (the Jizi state), Wi Man Joseon and the four Han commanderies were the major parts of ancient Korean history, occupying Manchuria to the east of the Liao River and the Korean peninsula. Unless correcting this misunderstanding, Chinese scholars will continue to claim that the history of Korean nation began with Chinese ruling, and that the history of the Manchurian states such as Guguryeo, Buyeo and Balhae was not Korean but Chinese borderland history.
If this frame is correct, the ancient Korean nation must have been ruled by China for long times. Because Goguryeo was established in Xuantu commandery under Chinese administration, it is possible to argue that Guguryeo was a successor for Chinese history.
However, ancient Chinese and Korean texts indicate that the existing frame of ancient Korean history is wrong. The King Jun's regime (the Jizi state) and Wi Man Joseon as well as the four Han commanderies were not major parts of ancient Korean history.
As clearly documented in the texts, occupying the entire Manchuria and the Korean peninsula, the western border of Dangun Joseon was the Luan River near Beijing. The western part of Dangun Joseon got through changes, with the establishment of the Jizi state in the Luan River valley and the following usurpation of Wi Man and his expansion to the Daling River valley. The Western Han conquered Wi Man Joseon and established the four Han commanderies in the region between the Luan River the Liao River. Thus, the Liao River became the western border of Dangun Joseon.
Accordingly, the consecutive establishments of the Jizi state, Wi Man Joseon, and the four Han commanderies were nothing but political transitions happened in the western borderland of Dangun Joseon. Despite the changes in its western borderland, Dangun Joseon was still developing, occupying Manchuria to the east of the Liao River and the Korean peninsula. Goguryeo, one of the feudal states (geosukook渠帥國) of the Dangun Joseon, took advantage of the decline in the Joseon's central control to develop into an independent power. Therefore, it is reasonable to say that Goguryeo was one of the Korean nations succeeding Dangun Joseon.
Nevertheless, the Korean historical society still systemizes that the regime of King Jun (the Jizi state), Wi Man Joseon and the four Han commanderies were the major parts of ancient Korean history, occupying Manchuria to the east of the Liao River and the Korean peninsula. Unless correcting this misunderstanding, Chinese scholars will continue to claim that the history of Korean nation began with Chinese ruling, and that the history of the Manchurian states such as Guguryeo, Buyeo and Balhae was not Korean but Chinese borderland history.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 한국 고대사 체계의 오류
Ⅲ. 준왕정권, 위만조선, 한사군의 위치
Ⅳ. 단군조선과 고구려의 계승관계
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Descriptions of the History of Gojoseon Shown in Foreign Textbooks
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2007 .12
-
조선 후기 고대사 연구와 漢四郡
역사와 담론
2012 .10
-
중국학계의 고조선, 한사군 인식에 대한 비판적 검토
고조선단군학
2010 .11
-
단군학 정립을 위한 몇 가지 전제
고조선단군학
2003 .06
-
환웅, 삼조선과 부여ㆍ고구려ㆍ요ㆍ금ㆍ원ㆍ청의 계보 : 지식형태사에 입각한 한국과 방계의 역사
고조선단군학
2007 .06
-
한사군, 과연 난하 유역에 있었을까?
역사비평
2016 .05
-
‘고조선’조와 ‘전조선기’로 본 고조선의 역사적 실체 재인식
고조선단군학
2012 .05
-
‘한사군 한반도설’은 식민사학의 산물인가
역사비평
2016 .02
-
中國 正史 속의 高句麗-중국의 고구려 귀속 논리에 대한 문헌사적 검토-
고조선단군학
2004 .06
-
고조선 문화권 설정을 위한 역사관의 모색 : 몇 가지 이론의 적용
고조선단군학
2013 .12
-
북한의 단군민족주의에 대한 검토
고조선단군학
2019 .06
-
단군 : 역사와 신화, 그리고 민족
역사비평
2016 .11
-
고려ㆍ조선시대의 역사의식과 문화정체성론
韓國史學史學報
2004 .01
-
단군학과 한국정치학 : 근대 정치사상을 중심으로
고조선단군학
2005 .12
-
The Han River
Korea Journal
1965 .12
-
남과 북의 단군인식과 단군숭앙
고조선단군학
2005 .06
-
최근의 단군관련 인식혼란과 과제
고조선단군학
2002 .12
-
발해연안 고대문화와 고조선시기의 단군
고조선단군학
2004 .12
-
교과서에 서술된 ‘단군과 고조선’에 관한 고찰 : 문학교과서(7차 교육과정)를 중심으로
고조선단군학
2007 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015114500