메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국어국문학회 국어국문학 국어국문학 제140권
발행연도
2005.9
수록면
101 - 120 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Scarcity of materials and historical records is one of big problems in studies of women's classical literary history. This is why we need to turn a view point from ‘literary history’ to ‘history of oral and literary lives.’ The concept of ‘oral and literary lives’ is substituted for ‘literature’ which doesn't suit the purpose of explaining women's literary history. In this viewpoint, Haengjang(行狀), records of a dead person's life, and Myojimyong(墓誌銘), a kind of epitaphs, are very important sources for studies of women's literary history. Anthologies of men writers in the upper class, who used to be social leaders as scholars or statesmen, contain many pieces of Haengjang and Myojimyong for their mother, wives, daughters and so on.
I've tried to find records about oral and literary lives of women in the upper class in the 17th century through the materials as many as possible, especially about women's reading and writing in Chinese characters. According to the records, Chinese literary lives of women in the upper class could be divided to three types; the highest level that women could themselves not only read but also write, the second level that women could read and understand many kinds of Chinese Classics, and the third level that women could be basically educated in them but be bad of reading or writing in Chinese characters.

목차

1. 문제제기

2. 여성한문생활의 재현 양상

3. 17세기 사족 여성의 한문학적 소양

4. 자료와 대상의 이중성

참고문헌

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-015184684