지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article is written to call public attention to the existence of confusion and errors in dating historical events, which we can easily find among the various kinds of historical works, especially school text books. and to urge Korean historians to start to discuss how to fix these confusion and errors.
It seems that many scholars of Korean history, when writing their books and papers, do not pay enough attention to the difference between the Gregorian calendar, which is a solar calendar and the calendaric scheme now hegemonic in the world and the lunar calendars, which were hegemonic in the East Asia, including Korea, until the time when the East Asian countries put into effect calendar reforms one after another in the modem era. Owing to this lack of attention, many Korean historians tend to simply quote the number of the month and that of the date of a historical events just as the primary sources indicate, without converting the lunar calendaric date to the Gregorian calendaric one. And this in turn misleads the readers of Korean histories to accept them as if they were the month and the date of the Gregorian system.
To make matters worse, the school text books, currently used for the education of high school students, employs the two different dating systems without any explanation. In the worst cases, some of them. when it is necessary to quote the month and/or the date of a event, use the lunar calendaric date for one event here and use the Gregorian calendaric date for another event there. This kind of confusion and some chronological errors, found in some of the school text books but not mentioned here, could cause our young students to fail to locate historical events in the right chronological order. I think that now we should start to discuss how to fix these problems before it is too late.
It seems that many scholars of Korean history, when writing their books and papers, do not pay enough attention to the difference between the Gregorian calendar, which is a solar calendar and the calendaric scheme now hegemonic in the world and the lunar calendars, which were hegemonic in the East Asia, including Korea, until the time when the East Asian countries put into effect calendar reforms one after another in the modem era. Owing to this lack of attention, many Korean historians tend to simply quote the number of the month and that of the date of a historical events just as the primary sources indicate, without converting the lunar calendaric date to the Gregorian calendaric one. And this in turn misleads the readers of Korean histories to accept them as if they were the month and the date of the Gregorian system.
To make matters worse, the school text books, currently used for the education of high school students, employs the two different dating systems without any explanation. In the worst cases, some of them. when it is necessary to quote the month and/or the date of a event, use the lunar calendaric date for one event here and use the Gregorian calendaric date for another event there. This kind of confusion and some chronological errors, found in some of the school text books but not mentioned here, could cause our young students to fail to locate historical events in the right chronological order. I think that now we should start to discuss how to fix these problems before it is too late.
목차
1. 머리말 : 문제의 제기
2. 역사 속의 연호와 역법
3. 연호와 역법 사용에 보이는 혼란과 오류
4. 맺음말 : 문제의 해결 방안을 모색하며
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국의 표준 연력 DB시스템 구축
한국과학사학회지
2004 .01
-
藏書閣 소장 曆書에 대한 考察
장서각
2001 .12
-
조선의 역서 간행과 로컬사이언스
한국과학사학회지
2013 .01
-
고려 · 조선의 국제관계에서 역서가 가지는 의미와 그 변화
역사비평
2017 .11
-
‘鄕曆’에서 ‘東曆’으로 : 조선후기 自國曆을 갖고자 하는 열망
역사학보
2013 .06
-
고구려 5세기 금석문에 나타난 干支曆日 자료와 曆法 연구
동북아역사논총
2012 .06
-
조선 후기 역(曆) 계산과 역서(曆書) 간행 작업의 목표: ‘자국력’인가? 중국 수준 역서인가?
한국과학사학회지
2017 .01
-
고려 초의 국제관계와 年號紀年에 대한 재검토
역사학보
2010 .12
-
The Fisherman’ Calendar (Ⅱ)
Korea Journal
1988 .05
-
The Fisherman’s Calendar(Ⅰ)
Korea Journal
1988 .04
-
문화적 가공물과 시간 은유 표현
영어영문학연구
2018 .01
-
대한제국기 명시력 역서에 수록된 절후월령의 시간문화 양상
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2017 .09
-
조선 후기의 역서(曆書) 간행에 참여한 관상감 중인 연구
한국과학사학회지
2015 .01
-
간지기년(干支紀年)의 형성과정과 세수(歲首) · 역원(曆元) 문제
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2015 .09
-
The Religious Implications of the ‘Sacred Calendar’ of Korea
Korea Journal
1970 .07
-
천문대로서의 첨성대 이설(異說)에 대한 재론(再論)
한국고대사연구
2017 .06
-
조선 후기 역서의 구조와 의미 : 시헌력서의 다층적인 시간주기
민속학연구
2005 .12
-
滿洲國(1932~1945)의 時憲書 발행과 그 정치적 의미
동북아역사논총
2008 .12
-
뮈텔 주교 재임기의 큰 첨례표(1916~1933년) 연구
교회사연구
2013 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015494471