지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The heritage of Japanese imperialism, unpunished during the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal, casts gloom over the democracy of modern Japan. In January 2001 the distortions of the programme titled “Sexual Violence in War Questioned” on the NHK Educational Channel which provoked conflicts between the Asahi Shimbun and NHK and law suit against NHK by VAWWNet, resulted from the legacy of Imperial Japan.
Japanese community, political, economic and journalistic, slanted to the right in all have maintained the revision of the Constitution in memorial of defeated war on 60th Anniversary. They continue to deny war responsibility and ‘guilty consciousness of origin’ compelled by the Allies due to the war defeated should recover ‘self-pride as Japanese citizens.’ Further they should revise the Peace Constitution which hampers the military rearmament and leap to political military power which parallel the world's No 2 capitalist power.
It is the very Neo-cons, Abe Shinzo and Ishihara Shintaro, who lead this stream of revisionist of the Constitution. They are counted as post-Koizumis. Revering or admiring the Emperor, they aspire to the return to old Japan or the pre-war reactionary establishment. Their goal and reason for the revision of the Constitution will be clearly told through the analysis of the change in the US-Japan alliance, the national security, military industries, the nationalists' gathering at the Yasucuni Shrine.
However, people who are eager to preserve the post-war democracy, are even minority, such as Oe Genzaburo and Oda Makoto, they assert that they should protect the war-renouncing Article 9 and absolutely ban the recurrence of the pre-war chauvinistic system. Despite the manifest support and pressure of ‘tsukurukai’ against the selectors of the texts, the rate of selection of the “New History” textbook of right-wing publisher Fusosha was merely 0.39%. This is attributed to the allied efforts of the grass-root people, conscientious citizens in Japan and people from East Asia.
Japanese community, political, economic and journalistic, slanted to the right in all have maintained the revision of the Constitution in memorial of defeated war on 60th Anniversary. They continue to deny war responsibility and ‘guilty consciousness of origin’ compelled by the Allies due to the war defeated should recover ‘self-pride as Japanese citizens.’ Further they should revise the Peace Constitution which hampers the military rearmament and leap to political military power which parallel the world's No 2 capitalist power.
It is the very Neo-cons, Abe Shinzo and Ishihara Shintaro, who lead this stream of revisionist of the Constitution. They are counted as post-Koizumis. Revering or admiring the Emperor, they aspire to the return to old Japan or the pre-war reactionary establishment. Their goal and reason for the revision of the Constitution will be clearly told through the analysis of the change in the US-Japan alliance, the national security, military industries, the nationalists' gathering at the Yasucuni Shrine.
However, people who are eager to preserve the post-war democracy, are even minority, such as Oe Genzaburo and Oda Makoto, they assert that they should protect the war-renouncing Article 9 and absolutely ban the recurrence of the pre-war chauvinistic system. Despite the manifest support and pressure of ‘tsukurukai’ against the selectors of the texts, the rate of selection of the “New History” textbook of right-wing publisher Fusosha was merely 0.39%. This is attributed to the allied efforts of the grass-root people, conscientious citizens in Japan and people from East Asia.
목차
1. 서론
2. ‘기쿠 터부‘(菊花에 대한 禁忌)
3. 상징천황제의 천황, 패전 후 인식은 바뀌었는가
4. 살아 있는 현인신, 천황의 창조
5. 개헌과 호헌
6. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본의 전쟁책임문제와 네오내셔널리즘
아시아문화연구
2013 .03
-
동학농민전쟁과 일본군
역사연구
2014 .12
-
国際情勢と日本ㆍ北朝鮮の動向から東アジアの平和構築を考える
아시아문화연구
2006 .12
-
일본에서의 전쟁과 종교
원불교사상과종교문화
2009 .12
-
Perspectives on the Korean War in Japanese High School Textbooks : Research Trends of Japanese Academia and their Reflection in the Textbooks
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .03
-
日清、日露戦争期における日本キリスト教とその朝鮮認識に関する研究
일본문화연구
2014 .10
-
한일협정 후 한국 지식인의 일본 인식
동북아역사논총
2011 .09
-
전쟁 기억과 전후 중일외교의 중층구조 - 전쟁종료문제의 인식과 해석의 어긋남 -
日本思想
2013 .01
-
중일ㆍ태평양 전쟁과 기독교 : 한일 기독교의 대응 상황 비교를 중심으로
한국기독교와 역사
2004 .09
-
한국전쟁 60년, 한반도와 세계
역사비평
2010 .05
-
근대 일본의 전사자 위령에 대한 연구사적 접근 : 전후 일본학계의 연구를 중심으로
비교문화연구
2011 .07
-
패전 직후 일본의 ‘평화교육’ 재음미
역사와 담론
2012 .10
-
한국전쟁기 전쟁시의 국가주의의 시선
한국시학연구
2008 .04
-
韓日兩國의 歷史認識問題
사학연구
2003 .12
-
태평양전쟁직후 한일(韓日) 소설에 나타난 패전 일본여성의 성격 비교 연구 : 황순원의 「술 이야기」와 다자이오사무의 「斜陽」을 중심으로
비평문학
2010 .03
-
The Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895) : Japanese National Integration and Construction of the Korean “Other”
International Journal of Korean History
2012 .02
-
아시아-태평양전쟁과 한국의 주권회복
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
동북아 평화벨트 시론 : 한중일 전쟁 기억, 망각을 넘어 평화의 연대로
역사비평
2009 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015494840