메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
19세기영어권문학회 19세기 영어권 문학 19세기 영어권 문학 제10권 2호
발행연도
2006.8
수록면
177 - 193 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article examines the role of the Victorian reviews on Jane Eyre in both enforcing Victorian gender ideology and revealing its fissure. The reviews functioned as a social structure which reproduced and naturalized Victorian gender schema. But the gender ideology was also a site of cultural contestation during the middle of the nineteenth century, despite repeated invocations of ‘Angel in the House’ in the reviews.
To Victorian reviewers, Bronte’s treatment of love was a consistently vexing issue, refuting the language of separate spheres. The anger of book reviewers was directed toward the heroine's morality, especially her suspicious sexual purity. But Bronte's plain-featured heroine who was emphatically “not an angel,” was also extremely fascinating. Some reviewers even celebrated her power of morality. This contradictory attitude shows that gender ideology is not fixed one but the site of constant struggle.
The debate on gender identity of Currer Bell, Charlotte Bronte's pseudonym, also reveals that the Victorian gender scheme was unstable. Critical reaction to this gender-neutral pseudonym was frustrated bafflement. But whether the reviewers regarded Bell as a woman writer or as a male writer, both of them ironically judged her identity based on the same gender schema. This curious contradiction is a fundamental challenge to Victorian gender ideology.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-017292958