지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The present study was designed to investigate the comprehension of “who” and “what” questions in 2- to 3-year-old normal children. Sixty children were divided into 3 groups depending on their ages, i.e., age groups 2;6-2;11, 3;0-3:5, and 3;6-3;11. Three types of “who” questions and 2 types of “what” questions were generated depending on the attached case markers, i.e., who-nominative, who-accusative, who-dative, what-nominative, and what-accusative. The children watched 36 cuts of short video recordings. After watching each cut, they were asked to answer one of the 5 types of wh-questions.
For the “who-nominative” and “what-accusative” questions, even the late 2-year-old children performed with over 70% of accuracy, and the late 3-year-old children performed with over 95% of accuracy. For the “who-accusative” and “who-dative” questions, the late 2-year olds exhibited difficulty in comprehension with performance accuracy of 41% and 33%, respectively. However, the late 3-year olds could comprehend those questions correctly with over 90% of accuracy. On the other hand, in answering “what-nominative” questions, the children did not show rapid development across the age groups, as the mean performance accuracies of the 3 groups were 39%, 49%, and 59%, respectively. The results indicated that children's understanding of a wh- question is largely affected by the case of the interrogative.
For the “who-nominative” and “what-accusative” questions, even the late 2-year-old children performed with over 70% of accuracy, and the late 3-year-old children performed with over 95% of accuracy. For the “who-accusative” and “who-dative” questions, the late 2-year olds exhibited difficulty in comprehension with performance accuracy of 41% and 33%, respectively. However, the late 3-year olds could comprehend those questions correctly with over 90% of accuracy. On the other hand, in answering “what-nominative” questions, the children did not show rapid development across the age groups, as the mean performance accuracies of the 3 groups were 39%, 49%, and 59%, respectively. The results indicated that children's understanding of a wh- question is largely affected by the case of the interrogative.
목차
ABSTRACT
1. 서론
2. 연구 방법
3. 결과
4. 결론 및 논의
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Children’s God Concepts through Open-ended Questions
기독교교육 논총
2008 .01
-
초등학교 영어 수업의 교사질문 분석
신영어영문학
2009 .08
-
The Prosody of Questions in Korean Conversation
언어과학연구
2003 .09
-
아동문학 텍스트 기반 질문 전략을 활용한 발화 중심의 초등 영어 수업 실행 연구
영어교과교육
2013 .01
-
Multi-Question Turns in English Conversation
담화와인지
2007 .08
-
학습자 질문 중심의 문학 감상 수업 연구 －<춘향전> 감상 수업을 중심으로－
문학교육학
2014 .01
-
문법수업에서 교사의 질문 구성 내용분석 연구
한말연구
2017 .01
-
The Study on Parent-Child Dialogue Patterns in Cinderella’s sister : Focusing on the Pair of Questions-Answers
Journal of Humanities Therapy
2017 .12
-
수업대화에서 교사의 질문화법 양상 연구 : 질문 연속체를 중심으로
국어교육연구
2017 .10
-
우리는 어떤 질문 앞에 서 있는가
한국여성신학
2013 .08
-
Working Memory and a Subject-object Asymmetry in L2 Processing of English Long-distance Wh-questions
응용언어학
2014 .12
-
KFL중국인학습자들의 한국어 의문사의문문과 부정사의문문의 피치실현과 지각양상
말소리와 음성과학
2013 .12
-
한국어에서의 예외격(ECM) 구문과 자동 주격 분석
생성문법연구
2014 .01
-
Constraints on Multiple Nominative Constructions in Korean : A Constraint - Based Lexicalist Approach
언어과학연구
2001 .12
-
초등 문법 교육의 질문 전략 구현 방안
우리말연구
2019 .01
-
Questioning and Feedback in the Preschool TEE Classroom
영어학
2011 .03
-
외국인 학습자의 질문 유형 분석 연구 : 한국 옛이야기를 이용하여
동악어문학
2018 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-701-017597638