지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is comparative research on story types originating from the Buddhist scriptures of India, China and Korea. The purpose of this study is: first, to analytically and positively reconsider the theory that "Journey Story to God to Receive Reward" is based on Buddhist scriptures second, to investigate the intertextuality between the stories of the three countries and third, to clearly reveal both the common and different points of the three stories.
Originally, the early types of "Journey Stories to God to Receive Reward" were mixed with both realistic and fictional stories of India. In this stage, the stories were unbalanced and their motifs were unorganized. These stories did not feature materiality as an independent type of folktale. This means the oral traditional history of these kinds of stories did not date back far enough to form a specific type of story. Oral stories from outside India playeda crucial role in overcoming the immature stage of India’s oral stories.
These Indian stories made it to China, where the immature and unstable factors of the Indian stories were omitted, mediated and complemented and they became an independent form of traditional folktale. In this process, Buddhist teaching was applied and specifically, the fact that one of the three Chinese puzzles is connected with the main character’s marriage implies that the Buddhist factors in these folktales, and common people’s desires, were harmonized. The balance between the Buddhist theme and the common people’s desires is the most important variation in the process that Indian folktales succeeded in establishing in China.
It seems that Korean oral stories came from Chinese stories, judging from the similarity of types and motifs. The basic type of Korean oral story is closer to that of China than to that of India. The difference between the Korean and Chinese stories is that a concept called "Bok," which means prosperity, happiness and health is emphasized more in the Korean stories. In the Korean stories, the desire that will achieve “Bok” is expressed more strongly than in Chinese stories, so ethical acts expressed in the Chinese stories, which are the necessary conditions to acquire “Bok”, were eliminated. The emphasis on “Bok” in Korean oral stories shows Korean people’s thought process very well.
Originally, the early types of "Journey Stories to God to Receive Reward" were mixed with both realistic and fictional stories of India. In this stage, the stories were unbalanced and their motifs were unorganized. These stories did not feature materiality as an independent type of folktale. This means the oral traditional history of these kinds of stories did not date back far enough to form a specific type of story. Oral stories from outside India playeda crucial role in overcoming the immature stage of India’s oral stories.
These Indian stories made it to China, where the immature and unstable factors of the Indian stories were omitted, mediated and complemented and they became an independent form of traditional folktale. In this process, Buddhist teaching was applied and specifically, the fact that one of the three Chinese puzzles is connected with the main character’s marriage implies that the Buddhist factors in these folktales, and common people’s desires, were harmonized. The balance between the Buddhist theme and the common people’s desires is the most important variation in the process that Indian folktales succeeded in establishing in China.
It seems that Korean oral stories came from Chinese stories, judging from the similarity of types and motifs. The basic type of Korean oral story is closer to that of China than to that of India. The difference between the Korean and Chinese stories is that a concept called "Bok," which means prosperity, happiness and health is emphasized more in the Korean stories. In the Korean stories, the desire that will achieve “Bok” is expressed more strongly than in Chinese stories, so ethical acts expressed in the Chinese stories, which are the necessary conditions to acquire “Bok”, were eliminated. The emphasis on “Bok” in Korean oral stories shows Korean people’s thought process very well.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 불전소재 인도 유형담의 설화적 기반
Ⅲ. 중국 전승 유형의 고찰
Ⅳ. 한국 전승 자료의 유형과 내용
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[A Story] D. M. Z.
Korea Journal
1968 .12
-
[Story] Another Man’s Room
Korea Journal
1976 .12
-
[A Story] The New Life
Korea Journal
1968 .03
-
고소설 유형의 형성과 변이 양상－남녀결연서사를 중심으로
어문연구
2007 .01
-
소설 수업의 한 방법, 하이퍼링크로 즐기는 이야기의 유희
문학교육학
2008 .01
-
<安憑夢遊錄> 主題攷
어문학
2003 .06
-
나의 이야기
한국여성신학
2012 .01
-
나의 이야기
한국여성신학
2016 .12
-
나의 이야기
한국여성신학
1993 .09
-
나의 이야기
한국여성신학
1993 .06
-
佛經故事의 中國故事化 과정상의 특징 및 의의 : 佛經淵源類故事를 중심으로
중국어문학논집
2019 .04
-
‘나무꾼과 선녀’ 설화의 민담적 성격과 주제에 관한 연구
국어국문학
2004 .09
-
[Short Story] Operation
Korea Journal
1973 .01
-
18세기 야담집의 동일 구전이야기 수용과 그 의미
한국문학논총
2003 .01
-
모바일러닝(Mobile Learning)을 통한 기독교 신앙교육
대학과 복음
2013 .12
-
[Story] The Visitor
Korea Journal
1975 .01
-
A Review of Story Grammars
어학연구
1984 .09
-
二僧競合談의 변이양상과 그 의미
동악어문학
2011 .02
-
‘살아온 이야기’의 담화 전략 - 삶의 구조화를 중심으로-
韓國古典硏究
2009 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-380-017630302