메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국국제조세협회 조세학술논집 租稅學術論集 第21輯 第1號
발행연도
2005.2
수록면
47 - 79 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The problems and improvements of local tax relief system are summarized as follows:
First, administrative appeal under current local tax law needs to become a compulsory preceding rather than a voluntary one as it is now, because there are many flaws at present such as inconsistency with compulsory preceding of national tax. A local tax tribunal, which functions in a similar fashion as a national tax tribunal, shall be considered as a short-term solution to enhance independence and impartiality of the tax appeal system. As a mid/long-term solution, the creation of tax tribunal which manages not only the national tax appeal system but also the local tax appeal system is suggested.
Second, the examination request system under the Board of Audit and Inspection Act should be repealed. Current law allows the system of request for examination under the Board of Audit and Inspection Act, as well as appeal system under the Local Tax Act. There are many problems with the system of request for examination under the Board of Audit and Inspection Act, such as the giving of priority to administrative supervision over preservation of taxpayers right.
Third, the request for pre-assessment shall be vitalized as it is the relief of right in advance. A request for pre-assessment lets the tax payer know how the payable tax amount was calculated before taxes are levied upon tax investigation or advance notice and the taxpayer may make an appeal for pre-assessment in case the tax payer has objection, thereby promoting the effectiveness of the relief of tax payer’s right.
The last issue to be discussed is whether conflicts between local governments and tax payers could be resolved by conference or compromise. However, conference or compromises are unlikely to resolve the conflicts under the current legal system because there is no stipulated provision under the current tax law.

목차

Ⅰ . 序說
Ⅱ . 現行 地方稅救濟制度의 意義와 現況
Ⅲ . 地方稅 救濟制度의 立法例
Ⅳ . 現行 地方稅 救濟制度의 問題點과 改善方案
Ⅴ . 結語
〈參考文獻〉
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)

  • 헌법재판소 2001. 6. 28. 선고 2000헌바30 전원재판부

    가. 헌법 제107조 제3항은 ``재판의 전심절차로서 행정심판을 할 수 있다. 행정심판의 절차는 법률로 정하되, 사법절차가 준용되어야 한다``고 규정하고 있으므로, 입법자가 행정심판을 전심절차가 아니라 종심절차로 규정함으로써 정식재판의 기회를 배제하거나, 어떤 행정심판을 필요적 전심절차로 규정하면서도 그

    자세히 보기

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-329-016730915