지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The studies of families and relatives, which had continued since the Japanese occupation period and up until the 1980s, can be examined in three separate periods. During the first and second periods, studies tended to take for granted the existence of paternal-based group of relatives in the past, based upon the theory of social evolution. And then, coming into the 3rd period, the so-called ‘positive’ studies commenced.
The achievements and failures that have been made so far, can be evaluated in terms of the so-called Positivism and theories. Members of the modern historical society in Japan claimed that they inherited the ‘positive historical studies’ originated by Ranke of Germany, and Koreans also pursued to maintain such attitude toward history even after 1945. Yet the historians were overwhelmed by Western theoretical influences, and believed that the theory of evolution was indeed representing the truth regarding social phenomena, so ironically they were not able to really reach the level of actual positivism. As a result, positive studies that had been conducted during the Japanese occupation period were summarily ignored, while those studies actually had some merits and values that should not be overlooked so quickly. It reminds us of the importance of not blindly following a foreign theory, and always being prepared to verify something before embracing it.
Also, there is the issue of ‘practice’. It is not always most ideal to have a particular line of studies linked to a particular comtemporary issue of the society. But specific studies tend to attract attention and be acknowledged by the public, and also inspire future scholars and researchers, due to the existence of a certain social environment or atmosphere. So, studies must be conducted on ‘positive’ terms, with consideration of the social issues as well. And scholars should venture upon actually doing something, by either widening their perspectives, or suggesting options and alternatives and resolutions.
The achievements and failures that have been made so far, can be evaluated in terms of the so-called Positivism and theories. Members of the modern historical society in Japan claimed that they inherited the ‘positive historical studies’ originated by Ranke of Germany, and Koreans also pursued to maintain such attitude toward history even after 1945. Yet the historians were overwhelmed by Western theoretical influences, and believed that the theory of evolution was indeed representing the truth regarding social phenomena, so ironically they were not able to really reach the level of actual positivism. As a result, positive studies that had been conducted during the Japanese occupation period were summarily ignored, while those studies actually had some merits and values that should not be overlooked so quickly. It reminds us of the importance of not blindly following a foreign theory, and always being prepared to verify something before embracing it.
Also, there is the issue of ‘practice’. It is not always most ideal to have a particular line of studies linked to a particular comtemporary issue of the society. But specific studies tend to attract attention and be acknowledged by the public, and also inspire future scholars and researchers, due to the existence of a certain social environment or atmosphere. So, studies must be conducted on ‘positive’ terms, with consideration of the social issues as well. And scholars should venture upon actually doing something, by either widening their perspectives, or suggesting options and alternatives and resolutions.
목차
머리말
1. 일제시기의 연구
2. 해방이후~1960년대의 연구
3. 1970~1980년대의 연구
4. 연구의 반성과 전망
맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
가족ㆍ친족 문화의 전통과 계승
민속연구
2004 .02
-
마을과 친족, 그리고 문화 : 친족 연구의 관점과 방법론
민속연구
2005 .02
-
국경이 놓인 오사카 재일한인 여성의 가족과 친족
지방사와 지방문화
2010 .05
-
서울의 친족생활에 대한 고찰
[TCHCCOS] 향토서울
1990 .01
-
조선후기 부계 가족·친족의 확산과 몇 가지 문제
한국사학보
2016 .02
-
[역비논단] 14세기 이후 친족용어의 변천과 친족관계
역사비평
2003 .05
-
[고찰과 연구] 한조 비친족교제에서의 친족호칭의 사용대비
중국조선어문
2005 .03
-
1945년 이후의 가족의 변화
한국학연구
1988 .10
-
조선족의 친족관계와 친족이념 : 가족의 일상생활ㆍ이동ㆍ의례를 통한 고찰
통일인문학
2015 .12
-
친족체계의 실천적 이해 : 요루바 친족 출계율을 중심으로
비교문화연구
2000 .12
-
한국사회의 가족해체와 가족신학의 정립의 필요성
장신논단
2010 .12
-
속담과 수수께끼 속에 보이는 가족과 친족의 민속학적 연구
강원민속학
2003 .09
-
[고찰과 연구] 속담으로 본 우리 민족의 친족관계
중국조선어문
2003 .05
-
한국사회의 가족문제와 『주역』의 해법
한국학논집
2011 .03
-
시각문화 속에 투영된 현대 한국의 가족 이미지
인문콘텐츠
2014 .12
-
Social Function of the Family
Korea Journal
1963 .10
-
비금도의 친족조직과 친족원리
도서문화
2002 .02
-
친족호칭과 준친족호칭의 형태구조차이에 대하여 : 조선어와 한어를 중심으로
중국조선어문
2007 .07
-
한국 가족문화와 기독교
한국기독교신학논총
2005 .10
-
가족체계이론을 중심으로 한 위기가족을 위한 목회적 돌봄
복음과 상담
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016210276