지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Examined in this article are the Seo’eol figures of the Goryeo period, who were also the former version of the Joseon Seo’eol figures. They were called as a whole as ‘Seo/Eol’ in Joseon, but in Goryeo there was a strict distinction between ‘Seo(庶)’ and ‘Eol(孼).’ In the early half of the Goryeo period, the latter(“Eolja” figures) were not allowed to be appointed to governmental positions, and the former(“Seoja” figures) were in some cases restricted from applying for the dynastic competitive examination and was not allowed to rise above certain level of posts inside the government.
But coming into the second half of the Goryeo period, not only cases of Seoja figures but also those of Eolja figures, in which they were able to apply for the dynastic exam and rise to the highest level of posts inside the government, started to emerge. We can see such changes inside the royal family as well, as the Eolja sons of the king, who were formerly without any right to claim succession to the throne and were forced to become Buddhist priests, were now entitled to become governmental officials or receive honorary entitlements. We can see that from the case of King Gongmin-wang’s Eolja son Wang Wu, who was enthroned in 1374 as Gongmin-wang’s successor.
Elevation in the Eolja figures’ status in the second half of the Goryeo period was enabled in the wake of the Yuan imperial government’s strong and steady influences and interventions into Goryeo internal affairs. At first, the Eolja figures mounted individual attempts and efforts to use the situation to their advantage. And when they grew sufficiently accustomed to the Yuan imperial order, their acknowledgement of the Yuan order, its law codes which were not without Chinese elements, and the Chinese nature of such behavioral protocols, all enabled them to accept the notion that Eolja figures deserve new chances and especially avenues of career advancement which were not available for them before. The Yuan law code which dictated and defined the status and rights of the ‘Seo(庶)’ figures literally granted the Seo and Eol figures in Goryeo the right to claim fiscal properties and career opportunities. The Goryeo leadership, including all the Confucian intellectuals, positively responded to the situation and recognized the Eolja figures’ political and social rights. Their status elevation did not involve anything abnormal or illegal, and even after Yuan lost its influences, they maintained such elevated status, which explain how the social status of the Seo/Eol figures in the early half of the Joseon period came to be established.
But coming into the second half of the Goryeo period, not only cases of Seoja figures but also those of Eolja figures, in which they were able to apply for the dynastic exam and rise to the highest level of posts inside the government, started to emerge. We can see such changes inside the royal family as well, as the Eolja sons of the king, who were formerly without any right to claim succession to the throne and were forced to become Buddhist priests, were now entitled to become governmental officials or receive honorary entitlements. We can see that from the case of King Gongmin-wang’s Eolja son Wang Wu, who was enthroned in 1374 as Gongmin-wang’s successor.
Elevation in the Eolja figures’ status in the second half of the Goryeo period was enabled in the wake of the Yuan imperial government’s strong and steady influences and interventions into Goryeo internal affairs. At first, the Eolja figures mounted individual attempts and efforts to use the situation to their advantage. And when they grew sufficiently accustomed to the Yuan imperial order, their acknowledgement of the Yuan order, its law codes which were not without Chinese elements, and the Chinese nature of such behavioral protocols, all enabled them to accept the notion that Eolja figures deserve new chances and especially avenues of career advancement which were not available for them before. The Yuan law code which dictated and defined the status and rights of the ‘Seo(庶)’ figures literally granted the Seo and Eol figures in Goryeo the right to claim fiscal properties and career opportunities. The Goryeo leadership, including all the Confucian intellectuals, positively responded to the situation and recognized the Eolja figures’ political and social rights. Their status elevation did not involve anything abnormal or illegal, and even after Yuan lost its influences, they maintained such elevated status, which explain how the social status of the Seo/Eol figures in the early half of the Joseon period came to be established.
목차
머리말
1. 얼자(?子)의 관직 진출과 왕위 계승
2. 원 법률의 적용과 한족 예제(禮制)의 긍정
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
중국 조선족학교의 ‘학교문화’에 관한 고찰 : 한족학생의 수용
한국민족문화
2015 .05
-
新羅 五廟制 受容의 意味
한국고대사연구
2020 .03
-
주자와 다산의 『논어』 禮개념 주석에 대한 일고찰
철학연구
2019 .11
-
『禮記』 祭禮觀에 나타난 尊王思想적 禮制의 특성에 대한 연구
동양철학연구
2017 .01
-
荀子의 예(禮)와 법(法)
대동철학
2019 .01
-
원법제 연구의 시의성과 필요성
역사와현실
2016 .03
-
시례(時禮)와 권도(權道)에 대한 시각- 『맹자』의 「남여수수불친예여장(男女授受不親禮與章)」에대한 해석을 중심으로 -
민족문화연구
2015 .01
-
『家禮疾書』와 『星湖禮式』의 역사성
민족문화연구
2020 .01
-
중국 조선족 소설에 나타난 한족 형상 연구
순천향 인문과학논총
2018 .01
-
變禮書를 통해 본 조선후기 『家禮』 연구의 특성 및 함의―『禮疑答問分類』와 『禮疑類輯』을 중심으로―
민족문화연구
2018 .01
-
원굉도(袁宏道) 시의 ‘전변’에 관한 검토
중어중문학
2016 .09
-
外国語としての日本語学習による社会文化的規範の顕在化 : 迷惑行為に対する認知を例に
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2016 .04
-
元雜劇에 투영된 蒙古語 語法 특징
외국학연구
2019 .01
-
루안판의 『북원사』에 대한 비판적 검토 - 주요 서술의 특이성과 쟁점을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2022 .09
-
고려 太祖代 대외 교섭과 外交儀禮
한국사연구
2015 .09
-
조선족 소설에 나타난 타자 : ‘이웃’ 형상 연구
국어국문학
2019 .03
-
원 간섭기 고려 왕실의 티베트불교 수용과 밀교의례의 확산
이화사학연구
2017 .01
-
1356년 공민왕 反元政治 再論
역사학보
2015 .03
-
퇴계 수양론에서 敬와 禮의 상관성에 관한 연구
양명학
2016 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-911-001981772