지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this paper, I inquire into the appositive NP and the similar constuructions to establish the concept of apposition and classify the appositive NP based on the kinds of co-reference.
Apposition is defined as a phenomenon that two or more NPs which are co-referential extralinguistically are apposed without an intermediate linguistic forms. An appositive construction(=appositive NP) is defined as an NP constituent which is formed by apposition and appositives are defined as NPs which are in appositive construction respectively.
Apposition meeting the following three conditions, we term full apposition: (ⅰ) Each of the appositives can be separately omitted without affecting the acceptability of the sentence. (ⅱ) Each fulfils the same syntactic function in the resultant sentences. (ⅲ) It can be assumed that there is no difference between the original sentence and either of the resultant sentences in extralinguistic reference. An appositive NP which violates one(or more) condition(s), we term it partial apposition.
We classify the co-reference into a semantic one and a pragmatic one. And we classify it into independent co-reference, unilateral co-reference and mutual co-reference according to whether each appositive is confirmed co-referential independently or whether an appositive is confirmed co-referential by the other or whether each appositive is confirmed co-referential by the two mutually.
Apposition is defined as a phenomenon that two or more NPs which are co-referential extralinguistically are apposed without an intermediate linguistic forms. An appositive construction(=appositive NP) is defined as an NP constituent which is formed by apposition and appositives are defined as NPs which are in appositive construction respectively.
Apposition meeting the following three conditions, we term full apposition: (ⅰ) Each of the appositives can be separately omitted without affecting the acceptability of the sentence. (ⅱ) Each fulfils the same syntactic function in the resultant sentences. (ⅲ) It can be assumed that there is no difference between the original sentence and either of the resultant sentences in extralinguistic reference. An appositive NP which violates one(or more) condition(s), we term it partial apposition.
We classify the co-reference into a semantic one and a pragmatic one. And we classify it into independent co-reference, unilateral co-reference and mutual co-reference according to whether each appositive is confirmed co-referential independently or whether an appositive is confirmed co-referential by the other or whether each appositive is confirmed co-referential by the two mutually.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 선행 연구 검토
3. 동격 구성의 개념
4. 동격 구성의 유형
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (22)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
동격 명사구의 유형 및 범위와 구조
우리말연구
2009 .01
-
스페인어 설명적 동격 구문
언어과학연구
2014 .09
-
국어 명사구의 유형에 대하여
어문연구
2008 .01
-
Similarities and Differences between the Close and Loose Apposition in English
영어학연구
2014 .01
-
Form and Function Mismatch in the English Appositional Construction
어학연구
2012 .12
-
한국인의 영어 호격 및 동격 발화에 나타나는 억양 양상 연구
영어학연구
2010 .01
-
Restriction and Apposition
어학연구
1993 .06
-
두 가지 유형의 소위 한국어 동격 구문
생성문법연구
2014 .01
-
국어 동격구성 논의에 대한 비판적 고찰
언어과학연구
2016 .06
-
Appositive Antecedent Contained Deletion and Parallelism
생성문법연구
2005 .01
-
Analyses for Two Different Types of Apposition
영어영문학21
2019 .01
-
‘인명고유명사구’와 ‘지칭·호칭명사구’ 결합의 통사적 특성 연구
한국어학
2016 .05
-
'NP-씩'에 관한 연구
어문학
1991 .03
-
국어 지칭어‧호칭어의 명사구 형성 문법
우리말글
2007 .08
-
한국어 대칭구문의 중국어 대응형식 연구
외국학연구
2017 .01
-
‘NP1이/가 NP2이/가 V’ 구문에 대한 논의 -서구 언어 중심론에서 벗어나기 위한 노력으로-
언어과학
2008 .01
-
On Referentiality of Metonymy: Meaning and Form
언어과학연구
2014 .12
-
‘讓’ 겸어문의 부정형식에 대한 小考
동아인문학
2017 .09
-
怎幺教韩国学生习得汉语主谓谓语句
중국어문학논집
2007 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-016237804