지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
We don’t believe that all literary works of a poet can be popular and entertained by the readers, becoming his or her masterpieces. On the contrary, only a few poems of his or hers are repeatedly read and loved by the readers in all times. As a result of this, only time-selected ones remain an eternal life as great literary works. In terms of this, all of the Jeong, Ji-Yong's poems can not be considered to be fine works, and it is indeed impossible for all his works to be his masterpieces.
However the critics of his poems seem to have shown a tendency to focus on his good points and greatness in his works. This indicates the status of Jeong, Ji-Yong as an outstanding poet in the history of Korean poetry, but I believe this kind of tendency has made his true literary historical status obscure. Therefore to position him properly in our history of literature, it is also necessary to evaluate the deficiencies and even the undesirables in his poems. In other words, the limitation of a poet whoever he or she is must be discussed deeply.
The purpose of this paper was to analyze the poems of Jeong, Ji-Yong in order to re-evaluate the claim that he was one of the most important poets in the history of Korean modern poetry. As seen from the result, the fact that he is a great poet in 1930's, but I put his weak points forward other than his greatness for the re-examine his true status in our history of literature.
In doing so, I brought forth some questions against the existing studies of his poetry, and also tried to discuss some demerits in his poems with respect to their forms and contents.
Some issues examined here are the inappropriateness of arrangement in Korean literary history, so the questions raised in this paper can be categorized in the following: firstly, a lack of historical views and understandings of the reality in his time, secondly, unsuitable poetic diction and obscure imagery, thirdly, some demerits shown in poetic technique, and lastly, his tendency towards aristocratism and high-toned mentality expressed in the poems.
Though these questions may lead our study to devaluate Jeong, Ji-Yong’s poetry, repeatedly saying, I believe we should analyze both merits and demerits of his poems in order to come up with a fair evaluation of his achievements.
The results of such efforts revealed that Jeong, Ji-Yong indeed had some weak points and we could conclude that he was rightfully estimated as one of the greatest poets in 1930’s with this line of investigation.
However the critics of his poems seem to have shown a tendency to focus on his good points and greatness in his works. This indicates the status of Jeong, Ji-Yong as an outstanding poet in the history of Korean poetry, but I believe this kind of tendency has made his true literary historical status obscure. Therefore to position him properly in our history of literature, it is also necessary to evaluate the deficiencies and even the undesirables in his poems. In other words, the limitation of a poet whoever he or she is must be discussed deeply.
The purpose of this paper was to analyze the poems of Jeong, Ji-Yong in order to re-evaluate the claim that he was one of the most important poets in the history of Korean modern poetry. As seen from the result, the fact that he is a great poet in 1930's, but I put his weak points forward other than his greatness for the re-examine his true status in our history of literature.
In doing so, I brought forth some questions against the existing studies of his poetry, and also tried to discuss some demerits in his poems with respect to their forms and contents.
Some issues examined here are the inappropriateness of arrangement in Korean literary history, so the questions raised in this paper can be categorized in the following: firstly, a lack of historical views and understandings of the reality in his time, secondly, unsuitable poetic diction and obscure imagery, thirdly, some demerits shown in poetic technique, and lastly, his tendency towards aristocratism and high-toned mentality expressed in the poems.
Though these questions may lead our study to devaluate Jeong, Ji-Yong’s poetry, repeatedly saying, I believe we should analyze both merits and demerits of his poems in order to come up with a fair evaluation of his achievements.
The results of such efforts revealed that Jeong, Ji-Yong indeed had some weak points and we could conclude that he was rightfully estimated as one of the greatest poets in 1930’s with this line of investigation.
목차
1. 문제의 제기
2. 문학사적 정리에 대한 의문
3. 역사의식과 현실인식에 대한 의문
4. 언어의식에 대한 의문
5. 시적 기교에 대한 의문
6. 동양적 시정신에 대한 의문
7. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[특집-대화적 비평의 논의를 위하여 2] 정지용 초기시의 방법 비판: 「향수」와 「유리창 1」을 중심으로
한국근대문학연구
2001 .10
-
주지적 태도에서 ‘思無邪’까지 : 鄭芝溶 詩를 위한 한 시각
한국시학연구
2002 .11
-
정지용 시의 미적 특성과 한계
한국학연구
2002 .06
-
정지용의 후기 산문시에 나타나는 죽음의 의미 : 정지용의 「盜掘」, 「호랑나븨」, 「禮裝」을 중심으로
어문론집
2012 .03
-
정지용의 ‘民謠風詩篇’과 초기시의 다양한 형식에 나타나는 비근대적 사유의 양상
어문학
2015 .03
-
정지용의 山水詩 考察 : 「九城洞」ㆍ「비」의 해석: ‘隱逸’의 의미를 중심으로
한국시학연구
2002 .05
-
정지용 번역 연구(1) : 정지용 초기 시 번역의 특징 - 정지용의 타고르(R. Tagore)와 블레이크(W. Blake) 시 번역을 중심으로
한국근대문학연구
2020 .10
-
정지용의 시와 타자의 문제
어문학
2002 .12
-
정지용의 시어 분석
국제언어문학
2003 .12
-
학습자 중심의 문학사교육 연구 : 정지용의 시론을 예로 하여
국어국문학
2006 .05
-
鄭芝溶의 초기시에 나타난 詩意識과 形象性 硏究 : 초기시를 중심으로
어문론집
2003 .12
-
순수의 곤경과 ‘윤리’의 기원 - 정지용 초기 일문시 연구
어문론총
2019 .01
-
정지용의 시가에서의 “물” 이미지 연구
국어국문학
2012 .12
-
정지용 시에 대한 서사공간이론적 고찰
한국시학연구
2012 .12
-
정지용 시에 나타난 상실의식 연구
인문학연구
2010 .12
-
『鄭芝溶詩集』에 나타난 비애의식 연구
국제언어문학
2020 .04
-
정지용 연구의 범위와 가능성 : 새로 발간된『정지용 전집』(2015)의 발간 의의
한국시학연구
2015 .12
-
정지용시(鄭芝溶詩)의 문학적(文學的) 특성(特性)
동악어문학
1983 .10
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-811-016459201