지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.6
- 수록면
- 166 - 170 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the Second World War before 1990s, North Korea and Japan had not communicated in diplomatic level between the governments while economic exchange among private sectors had been vivid. Political talk, however, started in 1991 and the summit of two countries was held in July 19th 2001. Some of Nuclear issues in North Korea were resolved satisfactorily to Japan, but there have been conflicts in prerequisites of Amity between the two countries: North Korea insists withholding compensation for colonial experience from Japan, while Japan argues for economic cooperation rather than the compensation.
Notwithstanding the two countries' parallel diplomatic position, the July 19th summit is estimated to improve the North Korea-Japan relations and the East Asian political environment because the summit was for exchange of each side's opinion on resolving the issue of abductions, compensation of colonial experience, security of two countries. If Amity between the two countries is achieved, it will be expected that the political environment around Korean Peninsula will be significantly changed, especially in Great Powers' relationship with North Korea. For instance, the United States and China may compete for North Korea and the relationship between Japan and the US policy towards North Korea may be modified. In aspects of North Korea, Amity can get benefits to the overall economy and it will help current policies on open economic policies.
Notwithstanding the two countries' parallel diplomatic position, the July 19th summit is estimated to improve the North Korea-Japan relations and the East Asian political environment because the summit was for exchange of each side's opinion on resolving the issue of abductions, compensation of colonial experience, security of two countries. If Amity between the two countries is achieved, it will be expected that the political environment around Korean Peninsula will be significantly changed, especially in Great Powers' relationship with North Korea. For instance, the United States and China may compete for North Korea and the relationship between Japan and the US policy towards North Korea may be modified. In aspects of North Korea, Amity can get benefits to the overall economy and it will help current policies on open economic policies.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 北日 修交의 含意
Ⅲ. 北日 修交의 爭點
Ⅳ. 北日 修交의 展望
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
北日 關係 正常化의 現況과 展望
동북아 문화연구
2006 .04
-
북한의 국가전략과 북일관계
북한연구학회보
2008 .01
-
북일 국교정상화 교섭과 북한의 체제전환
국제정치연구
2018 .12
-
김정은 정권의 대일 접근과 북일관계
국제정치연구
2016 .12
-
North Korea and South Korea-Japan Relations : With Reference to Japan's Two-Korea Policy
국제정치논총
1985 .12
-
A Japanese Perspective on North Korea: Troubled Bilateral Relations in a Complex Multilateral Framework
International Journal of Korean Unification Studies
2009 .01
-
북한의 대일정책 변천과 그 특징에 관한 연구
정치정보연구
2004 .12
-
The North Korean Economy: Current Situation, Crisis, and Possible Scenarios
Asian International Studies Review
2006 .01
-
中朝关系与中国的朝核政策
국제지역학논총
2009 .12
-
Moving from a North Korean Nuclear Problem to the Problem of North Korea
EAI 이슈브리핑
2009 .06
-
북한사회의 변화 전망과 대북 정책의 방향
경기연구원 기본연구
2009 .11
-
Changes in North Korea and Policy Responses of the International Community toward North Korea
[KIEP] 연구보고서
2009 .09
-
An Exploratory Study on the Distribution and Marketing Changes Under the North Korean System
산경연구논집
2020 .01
-
재일조선인 귀국자의 삶을 통해서 본 북한체제의 재조명 : 재일탈북자의 증언을 중심으로
아세아연구
2009 .09
-
Economic Opportunities Amid Improving Inter-Korean Relations and Denuclearization Talks
[KIEP] KIEP Opinions
2018 .06
-
From a Buffer Zone to a Strategic Burden: Evolving Sino-North Korea Relations during Hu Jintao Era
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2010 .01
-
북한 사회 연구동향과 과제
현대북한연구
2010 .04
-
한중국교정상화 이후 중국의 대북 영향력 변화에 관한 고찰 : 북ㆍ중관계의 변용을 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2011 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-015010962