지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 131 - 150 (20page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In modern public democracy, the legitimacy of democratic politics is acknowledged by the public opinion. Generally, public opinion can be formed through the press media. The freedom of expression is the very precondition of the formation. It is a right of political liberty that is directly related to the destiny of democratic politics. Under the freedom, therefore, functions most basic and essential to the realization of democratic political order can be implemented. Broadcasting is more socially influential than any other press media. It will be still critically positioned in the 21st century represented as the era of new media or multimedia.
In the past, the freedom of speech in this nation was understood mainly from U.S. and British views of liberalism. In modern public society, mass media including broadcasting have been enormously organized, emerging as a social power seeking towards business profit. In this era of public democracy, important functions of mass media are making it inevitable to modify the liberalistic view of the press so far believed. In public democracy, the freedom of expression cannot be considered only from the dimension of individual character realization. Democratic politics is justified by public opinion which is formed based on the freedom of expression. The freedom of speech is the very precondition of public opinion formation. It is a right of political liberty, on which the existence of democratic politics is dependent.
Broadcasting has many characteristics including limitedness and high influence. For this reason, public benefit and public responsibility become obligations of broadcasting. The responsibility is provided in the Broadcasting Law. The Article 5 of the law specifies the public responsibility of broadcasting in detail, putting limits on the freedom of broadcasting. The law specifies many regulations about the freedom of broadcasting provided such responsibility as foresaid is ensured. The regulations contain provisions regarding the public benefit-oriented responsibility of broadcasting with references to 'the general theory of 'social responsibility' and 'the public function of the press' under the theory of the constitution. Such public responsibility specified in the law justifies regulating broadcasting, but it should not withdraw the freedom of broadcasting that has been advocated by the conventional theory of the freedom of expression. The regulation of broadcasting towards public responsibility is restricted to non-public benefit broadcasting. In any way, however, broadcasting that complies with public benefit should be thoroughly protected. Even if the public responsibility of broadcasting with public opinion is requested, the traditional freedom of expression with self-regulation based should be still effective.
In the past, the freedom of speech in this nation was understood mainly from U.S. and British views of liberalism. In modern public society, mass media including broadcasting have been enormously organized, emerging as a social power seeking towards business profit. In this era of public democracy, important functions of mass media are making it inevitable to modify the liberalistic view of the press so far believed. In public democracy, the freedom of expression cannot be considered only from the dimension of individual character realization. Democratic politics is justified by public opinion which is formed based on the freedom of expression. The freedom of speech is the very precondition of public opinion formation. It is a right of political liberty, on which the existence of democratic politics is dependent.
Broadcasting has many characteristics including limitedness and high influence. For this reason, public benefit and public responsibility become obligations of broadcasting. The responsibility is provided in the Broadcasting Law. The Article 5 of the law specifies the public responsibility of broadcasting in detail, putting limits on the freedom of broadcasting. The law specifies many regulations about the freedom of broadcasting provided such responsibility as foresaid is ensured. The regulations contain provisions regarding the public benefit-oriented responsibility of broadcasting with references to 'the general theory of 'social responsibility' and 'the public function of the press' under the theory of the constitution. Such public responsibility specified in the law justifies regulating broadcasting, but it should not withdraw the freedom of broadcasting that has been advocated by the conventional theory of the freedom of expression. The regulation of broadcasting towards public responsibility is restricted to non-public benefit broadcasting. In any way, however, broadcasting that complies with public benefit should be thoroughly protected. Even if the public responsibility of broadcasting with public opinion is requested, the traditional freedom of expression with self-regulation based should be still effective.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 표현의 자유의 변천
Ⅲ. 방송의 자유의 이중적 성격
Ⅳ. 방송의 공적책임에 관한 구체적 검토
Ⅴ. 결어
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Freedom of the Press and Responsibilities of the Broadcasting Media in the 21st Century
언론과법
2003 .12
-
방송의 自由와 公的 責任 : 자유인가 책임인가
법학연구
1999 .12
-
독일 방송개념 규명논쟁에 관한 연구 : 주관적 및 객관적 방송자유의 관점을 중심으로
한국언론학보
2003 .06
-
21세기 정보화 사회에 있어서 방송의 자유와 기능
언론과법
2003 .12
-
한국 초기 방송의 국영화 과정에 관한 연구 : 1945년부터 1953년까지를 중심으로
한국언론학보
2000 .05
-
방송조직과 방송편성규약의 법적 성질에 관한 헌법학적 고찰 : 문화방송 ‘PD수첩 사건’에 관한 논의와 이에 대한 비판적 분석을 중심으로
언론과법
2010 .12
-
방송편성 규정의 법적 성격과 한계에 관한 헌법학적 연구
방송과 커뮤니케이션
2011 .03
-
미국 공영 텔레비전 PBS의 위기 : ‘상업적 비영리’ 공영방송과 ‘내부적 다원주의’
한국언론학보
2004 .10
-
방송광고를 둘러싼 규제의 논리적 타당성 검증 시론(試論)
미디어 경제와 문화
2003 .05
-
放送事業許可制의 正當化 論據에 관한 批判的 考察 : 2001. 5. 31, 2000 헌바 43 결정과 관련하여
공법학연구
2006 .02
-
프랑스 방송법제의 역사적 전개
언론과법
2010 .06
-
남북 방송교류 활성화 방안 및 방송개방에 대한 고찰
사회과학연구
2003 .02
-
방송의 정치적 독립성 확보를 위한 미디어 정책 방향 연구
한국언론정보학보
2009 .05
-
한국의 방송서비스 공익성심사에 관한 고찰 : 미국 및 영국의 사례를 중심으로
통상정보연구
2010 .03
-
방송콘텐츠 자율심의 규제체계의 효율화 방안 연구
문화산업연구
2012 .12
-
‘한반도 평화와 통일’을 위한 공영방송 법제 개선 방안
방송문화연구
2018 .12
-
지상파TV 방송시간 자율화 정책방안
방송문화연구
2003 .12
-
디지털방송의 법제도 : 해외 주요국에서 제기된 법제도 이슈를 중심으로
방송통신연구
2001 .08
-
공영방송의 스마트 미디어 및 인터넷 정책의 공익성에 관한 연구
한국언론정보학보
2013 .11
-
한국의 공영방송 연구 30년 : 1989년~2019년 국내 17개 학술지 메타 분석을 중심으로
한국방송학보
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-019488722