지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.12
- 수록면
- 283 - 306 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
How to impact a change of situations in the formation of a contract to the effect of contract late. Should the contract(especially continual contract, for example contract of suretyship) be fulfilled though its situations was changed entirely and essentially?
Some assert a debtor should fulfill the contract in even the situations. But the other insist on the debtor may not. The obligations should be changed according to the situations or vanish unless it is impossible. It's similar to the doctrine of frustration of contract.
The Korean Supreme Court has held fast to this view. The effect of contract must not disappear even if the situations are changed. But some time it is possible that the debtor terminate the contract. The termination does not have a retrospective power. So it's not practical many times. More scholars say that the court' view is not right.
I think their view is right. We can't say it is a breach in that case. If the important and essential parts of a contract have been changed, the obligations should be changed according to the situations and the debtor may dissolve the contract in some cases. It makes much problem if we permit easily. Of course We should give careful consideration to it.
Some assert a debtor should fulfill the contract in even the situations. But the other insist on the debtor may not. The obligations should be changed according to the situations or vanish unless it is impossible. It's similar to the doctrine of frustration of contract.
The Korean Supreme Court has held fast to this view. The effect of contract must not disappear even if the situations are changed. But some time it is possible that the debtor terminate the contract. The termination does not have a retrospective power. So it's not practical many times. More scholars say that the court' view is not right.
I think their view is right. We can't say it is a breach in that case. If the important and essential parts of a contract have been changed, the obligations should be changed according to the situations and the debtor may dissolve the contract in some cases. It makes much problem if we permit easily. Of course We should give careful consideration to it.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 비교법
Ⅲ. 한국 판례에 나타난 사정변경의 원칙
Ⅳ. 소결
Ⅴ. 결어
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
행정조달계약에 있어서 공익(公益)을 위한 계약의 변경 및 해지에 관한 연구
法學論文集
2017 .01
-
INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT LAWS AND FORMATION OF CONTRACT
국제거래와 법
2011 .12
-
영화산업 종사자관련 계약상의 몇 가지 과제
중앙법학
2011 .12
-
아파트분양계약과 사정변경의 원칙 : 아파트분양계약의 변경과 해제를 중심으로
법학연구
2009 .05
-
국제계약에 있어서 계약언어의 선택과 효과
중재연구
2005 .01
-
무역계약서 표면약관의 적용상의 유의점에 관한 연구
무역연구
2018 .01
-
지방자치단체의 수의계약
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
계약구속력의 근거에 관한 새로운 이론모델
중앙법학
2014 .06
-
계약이행보증금에 관한 연구
중앙법학
2011 .09
-
불공정약관 조항의 유형과 특징 - 최근 3년간 공정거래위원회에서 심결한 계약을 중심으로 -
재산법연구
2009 .01
-
국제물품매매계약에서 이행기전 계약위반과 그 구제에 관한 연구
무역학회지
2008 .11
-
장기계약에서 사정변경에 따른 대응방안
무역학회지
2005 .12
-
온라인 物品賣買契約에 관한 硏究
무역학회지
2002 .06
-
온라인계약의 특징
강원법학
2009 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-019488868