개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
One of the reasons that scholars from the People's Republic of China argued that the history of Koguryo belongs to Chinese history is Koguryo people's whereabouts after its collapse. First of all, their argument is based on the fact that remaining people of Koguryo were absorbed into tile population of Tang, Silla, Tujue, and Balhae. According to their study, the number of Koguryo people who moved into Tang was 300,000,100,000 to Silla, less than 10,000 to Tujue, and finally 200,000 to Balhae. Secondly, when Koguryo was destroyed, the number of households was about 697,000. Among them, there were diverse groups of minority people including Han Chinese. Thus, actual Koguryo households were less than 150,000, or 750,000 people. Thirdly, Koguryo people who moved to Tang territory was treated like Han Chinese, receiving a high official statue under Tang dynasty. Finally, they dispute that Koguryo people who remained in Koguryo territory disappeared within several decades after the destroy of Koguryo.
In this paper, I explored several reasons why the arguments of Chinese scholarships from the People's Republic of China cannot be supported. Firstly, the number of Koguryo people who were taken to Tang can be assumed 300,000 at largest. But, a large number of them moved to their original settlementafter all. And, 697,000 households of Koguryo at the time of the destroy were mostly Koguryo people. This is proved by Lelang written wooden slips recently discovered in North Korea. The written records divide a large number of Koguryo households into a small number of Han Chinese and aborigines. Third counterargument is that it is certain that some Koguryo people and their descendents who remained in Tang became high officials under Tang. However, they were treated as people from the ruined country, and except for some high officials, some were degraded to a slavery statue. Fourth reason is that Koguryo people who continued to live in Koguryo territory did not disappear at all. Instead, most remaining Koguryo people were able to be united again by the establishment of Balhae.
In this paper, I explored several reasons why the arguments of Chinese scholarships from the People's Republic of China cannot be supported. Firstly, the number of Koguryo people who were taken to Tang can be assumed 300,000 at largest. But, a large number of them moved to their original settlementafter all. And, 697,000 households of Koguryo at the time of the destroy were mostly Koguryo people. This is proved by Lelang written wooden slips recently discovered in North Korea. The written records divide a large number of Koguryo households into a small number of Han Chinese and aborigines. Third counterargument is that it is certain that some Koguryo people and their descendents who remained in Tang became high officials under Tang. However, they were treated as people from the ruined country, and except for some high officials, some were degraded to a slavery statue. Fourth reason is that Koguryo people who continued to live in Koguryo territory did not disappear at all. Instead, most remaining Koguryo people were able to be united again by the establishment of Balhae.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연구사
Ⅲ. 중화인민공화국의 고구려 유민연구 문제점
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
高句麗史
성곡논총
1997 .07
-
韓國 史書에 나타난 高句麗의 正體性
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
고구려 후기 고구려, 수ㆍ당, 북방 제국의 대립관계
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
4~5세기 고구려에 유입된 중국계 인물의 동향-문헌자료를 중심으로-
한국고대사연구
2003 .12
-
고구려 발해의 상관성 연구와 과제
고구려발해연구
2008 .07
-
高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
고구려와 북방민족의 관계에 대한 중화인민공화국 학계의 견해
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
中國 內 高句麗遺蹟에서 出土된 高句麗土器 硏究
중국사연구
2007 .01
-
唐朝의 高句麗人軍事集團
동북아역사논총
2009 .06
-
北方民族史에서 본 高句麗의 正體性 : 鮮卑, 契丹, 柔然을 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
中國 所在 高句麗 遺民의 동향
한국고대사연구
2001 .09
-
고구려 벽화를 통해서 본 고구려의 정체성 연구
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
墓誌로 본 在唐 高句麗 遺民의 祖先意識의 變化
대구사학
2010 .01
-
고구려 中期天下觀의 推移
고구려발해연구
2008 .03
-
漢과 高句麗의 關係
고구려발해연구
2002 .12
-
高句麗에 流入된 中國系人物의 動向 : 4~5世紀의 考古學 資料를 中心으로
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
唐人들이 인정한 高句麗人의 正體性 : 唐代墓誌銘에 보이는 高句麗의 別稱(朝鮮·三韓·扶餘) 分析을 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2009 .06
-
中國學界의 高句麗 對外關係史 硏究現況
한국고대사연구
2003 .09
-
壁畵를 通해서 본 高句麗의 옷차림文化 : 中國 및 北方地域과의 比較를 中心으로
고구려발해연구
2004 .06
-
2007년 이후 중국의 고구려 종교 · 사상사 연구 동향
고구려발해연구
2017 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-019496567