지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.9
- 수록면
- 37 - 63 (27page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The paper examines different and competing understandings of human security and stresses the task of reconciling these differences as an important challenge for the advocates of this emerging global norm. It argues that human security is a distinctive notion with strong regional roots for Asian governments, which could provide the foundation for promoting collective human security agenda.
While the paper focuses on the perceived tensions between its two salient aspects: "freedom from fear" (more favored in the West) and "freedom from want" (more favored in Asia), it also points out the scholastic challenge in identifying a common conceptual ground. "Freedom from fear" is depicted as the Canadian formulation, which views human security as "security of the people," centering on the human costs of violent conflict whereas "freedom from want," a different understanding of human security developed by Japan, views human security as a way of further protecting the security and rights of each person to ensure the survival and dignity of individuals as human beings in conflict situations.
The author notes on several obstacles to the promotion of human security in the Asian Pacific region. On the misgiving that human security is a "Western" political agenda, the author stresses that debates about human security do not fall within an East-West fault-line, and that there are also significant differences over its meaning within each camp. It refutes the view that human security is a "Western" concept, and identifies the Asian contributions to the development of the idea in both its respects.
At the same time, the paper argues that human security is not simply "new wine in old bottle." It represents a significant broadening of the notion of "comprehensive security," which privileged regime security. It also departs from the idea of "cooperative security" which did not address the possible tension between individual and state security.
In discussing the third barrier to human security in its political (freedom from fear) aspects, the paper examines the difficulties in linking human security with humanitarian intervention, whether hard or soft, given concerns about state sovereignty. The pursuit of human security, through regional collective action would undermine state sovereignty and the doctrine of non-interference, which remains the guiding principle of international relations in the Asia-Pacific region.
The paper concludes by highlighting the futility of pursuing human security as freedom from want in the absence of freedom from fear, and pleads for scholars and policy-makers to view the two understandings of human security as being complimentary and mutually-reinforcing. Promoting human security through a need-based approach does not negate the case for pursuing human security as freedom from fear, and a way of reducing the costs of violent conflict, especially in regions such as the Asia Pacific where the danger of conflict, both internal and inter-state, remains very, very real.
While the paper focuses on the perceived tensions between its two salient aspects: "freedom from fear" (more favored in the West) and "freedom from want" (more favored in Asia), it also points out the scholastic challenge in identifying a common conceptual ground. "Freedom from fear" is depicted as the Canadian formulation, which views human security as "security of the people," centering on the human costs of violent conflict whereas "freedom from want," a different understanding of human security developed by Japan, views human security as a way of further protecting the security and rights of each person to ensure the survival and dignity of individuals as human beings in conflict situations.
The author notes on several obstacles to the promotion of human security in the Asian Pacific region. On the misgiving that human security is a "Western" political agenda, the author stresses that debates about human security do not fall within an East-West fault-line, and that there are also significant differences over its meaning within each camp. It refutes the view that human security is a "Western" concept, and identifies the Asian contributions to the development of the idea in both its respects.
At the same time, the paper argues that human security is not simply "new wine in old bottle." It represents a significant broadening of the notion of "comprehensive security," which privileged regime security. It also departs from the idea of "cooperative security" which did not address the possible tension between individual and state security.
In discussing the third barrier to human security in its political (freedom from fear) aspects, the paper examines the difficulties in linking human security with humanitarian intervention, whether hard or soft, given concerns about state sovereignty. The pursuit of human security, through regional collective action would undermine state sovereignty and the doctrine of non-interference, which remains the guiding principle of international relations in the Asia-Pacific region.
The paper concludes by highlighting the futility of pursuing human security as freedom from want in the absence of freedom from fear, and pleads for scholars and policy-makers to view the two understandings of human security as being complimentary and mutually-reinforcing. Promoting human security through a need-based approach does not negate the case for pursuing human security as freedom from fear, and a way of reducing the costs of violent conflict, especially in regions such as the Asia Pacific where the danger of conflict, both internal and inter-state, remains very, very real.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 인간안보의 아시아적 근원
Ⅲ. 인간안보, 포괄적안보 그리고 협력안보
Ⅳ. 인간안보와 인도적 개입
Ⅴ. 결론
【참고문헌】
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
인간안보와 한국 외교
국제관계연구
2001 .03
-
Human Security: A Global Responsibility to Protect and Provide
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2011 .01
-
인간안보와 동아시아 : 그 시작에 즈음하여
국제관계연구
2006 .09
-
HUMAN SECURITY IN EAST ASIA : THE ROLE OF THE UNITED NATIONS AND REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
한국정치학회보
2003 .11
-
인간안보와 여성안보 : 동아시아에서의 여성안보 논의
국제관계연구
2006 .09
-
A Human Security Approach to Japan’s Modern State Formation : A Comparative Reading through the Lens of E H Norman’s Origins of the Modern Japanese State
Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies
2005 .01
-
국내주요그룹의 정보보안관리 체계에 관한 사례 연구
경영정보학연구
1998 .01
-
관세담보제도에 관한 연구
관세학회지
2004 .08
-
整合中国的社会保障管理体制的探索
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2013 .10
-
Policy-Based Network Security Management Model for Multiple Security Devices
Telecommunications Review
2004 .01
-
국가안보와 인간안보
국제정치논총
2004 .04
-
Security and Democratization in East Asia
국제정치논총
2004 .12
-
탈냉전 이후 안보환경의 변화에 따른 신세대 안보인식의 특성
국제관계연구
2007 .09
-
SARS와 중국의 인간안보
국제관계연구
2006 .09
-
인간의 요소에 초점을 맞춘 정보 보안 전략 탐색
교양학연구
2017 .12
-
지방공무원의 정보보호 인식 및 행태에 관한 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2010 .02
-
Human Security In Global Governance : Implications for the East Asian Region Focusing on South Korea
OUGHTOPIA
2011 .08
-
기업 보안 유형에 따른 보안사고 대응역량 : 사회기술시스템 이론 관점에서
한국IT서비스학회지
2013 .01
-
National Security Challenges of the Philippines under the Aquino Administration: A Human Security Approach
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2011 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-018345379